IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v55y2017i20p6108-6119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disassembly line balancing using linear physical programming

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Ali Ilgin
  • Hakan Akçay
  • Ceyhun Araz

Abstract

Disassembly is the separation of a product into its constituent parts in a systematic way. It has gained importance recently due to its vital importance in product recovery. Cost-effective implementation of disassembly operation has a direct impact on the profitability of product recovery activities (recycling, remanufacturing etc.). Although it is possible to carry out disassembly operations in a disassembly station or in a disassembly cell, the highest productivity is achieved in a disassembly line. The output of a disassembly line can be maximised only if the line is balanced. A linear physical programming-based disassembly line balancing method is proposed in this study. This method was used to balance a mixed-model disassembly line and the effectiveness of the method was illustrated by analysing the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Ali Ilgin & Hakan Akçay & Ceyhun Araz, 2017. "Disassembly line balancing using linear physical programming," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(20), pages 6108-6119, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:20:p:6108-6119
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1324225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2017.1324225
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2017.1324225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gokcen, Hadi & Erel, Erdal, 1997. "A goal programming approach to mixed-model assembly line balancing problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 177-185, January.
    2. Ali Koc & Ihsan Sabuncuoglu & Erdal Erel, 2009. "Two exact formulations for disassembly line balancing problems with task precedence diagram construction using an AND/OR graph," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(10), pages 866-881.
    3. McGovern, Seamus M. & Gupta, Surendra M., 2007. "A balancing method and genetic algorithm for disassembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 692-708, June.
    4. Kai Meng & Peihuang Lou & Xianghui Peng & Victor Prybutok, 2016. "An improved co-evolutionary algorithm for green manufacturing by integration of recovery option selection and disassembly planning for end-of-life products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(18), pages 5567-5593, September.
    5. Abd El-Wahed, Waiel F. & Lee, Sang M., 2006. "Interactive fuzzy goal programming for multi-objective transportation problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 158-166, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaojie Liu & Xuejian Gong & Roger J. Jiao, 2022. "Low-Carbon Product Family Planning for Manufacturing as a Service (MaaS): Bilevel Optimization with Linear Physical Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    3. Süleyman Mete & Faruk Serin & Zeynel Abidin Çil & Erkan Çelik & Eren Özceylan, 2023. "A comparative analysis of meta-heuristic methods on disassembly line balancing problem with stochastic time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 371-408, February.
    4. Lixia Zhu & Zeqiang Zhang & Yi Wang & Ning Cai, 2020. "On the end-of-life state oriented multi-objective disassembly line balancing problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1403-1428, August.
    5. Fang, Yilin & Liu, Quan & Li, Miqing & Laili, Yuanjun & Pham, Duc Truong, 2019. "Evolutionary many-objective optimization for mixed-model disassembly line balancing with multi-robotic workstations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 160-174.
    6. Ziyan Zhao & Pengkai Xiao & Jiacun Wang & Shixin Liu & Xiwang Guo & Shujin Qin & Ying Tang, 2023. "Improved Brain-Storm Optimizer for Disassembly Line Balancing Problems Considering Hazardous Components and Task Switching Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. He, Junkai & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Anjos, Miguel F., 2024. "Multi-objective disassembly line balancing and related supply chain management problems under uncertainty: Review and future trends," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianhua Cao & Xuhui Xia & Lei Wang & Zelin Zhang & Xiang Liu, 2019. "A Novel Multi-Efficiency Optimization Method for Disassembly Line Balancing Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Can B. Kalayci & Olcay Polat & Surendra M. Gupta, 2016. "A hybrid genetic algorithm for sequence-dependent disassembly line balancing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 321-354, July.
    3. Süleyman Mete & Faruk Serin & Zeynel Abidin Çil & Erkan Çelik & Eren Özceylan, 2023. "A comparative analysis of meta-heuristic methods on disassembly line balancing problem with stochastic time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 371-408, February.
    4. Jia Liu & Shuwei Wang, 2017. "Balancing Disassembly Line in Product Recovery to Promote the Coordinated Development of Economy and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Fang, Yilin & Liu, Quan & Li, Miqing & Laili, Yuanjun & Pham, Duc Truong, 2019. "Evolutionary many-objective optimization for mixed-model disassembly line balancing with multi-robotic workstations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 160-174.
    6. Wanlin Yang & Zixiang Li & Chenyu Zheng & Zikai Zhang & Liping Zhang & Qiuhua Tang, 2024. "Multi-Objective Optimization for a Partial Disassembly Line Balancing Problem Considering Profit and Carbon Emission," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Lixia Zhu & Zeqiang Zhang & Yi Wang & Ning Cai, 2020. "On the end-of-life state oriented multi-objective disassembly line balancing problem," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1403-1428, August.
    8. Hu, Peng & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Chu, Chengbin & Liu, Ming, 2024. "Integrated multi-product reverse supply chain design and disassembly line balancing under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    9. Ömer Faruk Yılmaz & Büşra Yazıcı, 2022. "Tactical level strategies for multi-objective disassembly line balancing problem with multi-manned stations: an optimization model and solution approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(2), pages 1793-1843, December.
    10. Yusha Zhou & Xiuping Guo & Dong Li, 2022. "A dynamic programming approach to a multi-objective disassembly line balancing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 921-944, April.
    11. S. Dutta & S. Acharya & Rajashree Mishra, 2016. "Genetic algorithm based fuzzy stochastic transportation programming problem with continuous random variables," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 835-872, December.
    12. Sumati Mahajan & S. K. Gupta, 2021. "On fully intuitionistic fuzzy multiobjective transportation problems using different membership functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 211-241, January.
    13. Bhattacharya, Sourabh & Govindan, Kannan & Ghosh Dastidar, Surajit & Sharma, Preeti, 2024. "Applications of artificial intelligence in closed-loop supply chains: Systematic literature review and future research agenda," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Kara, Yakup & Paksoy, Turan & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2009. "Binary fuzzy goal programming approach to single model straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 335-347, June.
    15. Bingtao Hu & Yixiong Feng & Hao Zheng & Jianrong Tan, 2018. "Sequence Planning for Selective Disassembly Aiming at Reducing Energy Consumption Using a Constraints Relation Graph and Improved Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Xuhui Xia & Wei Liu & Zelin Zhang & Lei Wang & Jianhua Cao & Xiang Liu, 2019. "A Balancing Method of Mixed-model Disassembly Line in Random Working Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Kowalski, Krzysztof & Lev, Benjamin, 2008. "On step fixed-charge transportation problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 913-917, October.
    18. Sharma, Dinesh K. & Jana, R.K., 2009. "A hybrid genetic algorithm model for transshipment management decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 703-713, December.
    19. Lv, Y. & Yan, X.D. & Sun, W. & Gao, Z.Y., 2015. "A risk-based method for planning of bus–subway corridor evacuation under hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 188-199.
    20. Bentaha, Mohand-Lounes & Voisin, Alexandre & Marangé, Pascale, 2020. "A decision tool for disassembly process planning under end-of-life product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 386-401.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:55:y:2017:i:20:p:6108-6119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.