IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v23y2016i1p65-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slouching tiger, roaring dragon: comparing India and China as late innovators

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew B. Kennedy

Abstract

Despite growing interest in the phenomenon of ‘latecomer innovation,’ the nature of this challenge -- and its relationship to globalization -- remain poorly understood. This article develops a theoretical framework that outlines the central policy challenges facing late innovators. It maintains that globalization has not fundamentally altered these challenges, but rather underlined the importance of surmounting them successfully. The article then employs this framework to compare China and India's progress in this regard. It finds that China has confronted the basic reform challenges more successfully, has more impressive innovation outputs, and has integrated into global networks more successfully. Yet it also notes the weaknesses of China's approach and the potential for these to constrain its development in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew B. Kennedy, 2016. "Slouching tiger, roaring dragon: comparing India and China as late innovators," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 65-92, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:65-92
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1105845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2015.1105845
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2015.1105845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thilo Hanemann & Daniel H. Rosen, 2012. "Chinese Direct Investment in the United States," EABER Working Papers 23339, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Wipo, 2014. "Global Innovation Index 2014," WIPO Economics & Statistics Series, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division, number 2014:gii, April.
    3. Carl Dahlman & Thomas Anderson, 2000. "Korea and the Knowledge-based Economy : Making the Transition," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13845, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christensen, Rasmus Corlin & Hearson, Martin, 2021. "The Rise of China and Contestation in Global Tax Governance," SocArXiv pzvy3, Center for Open Science.
    2. Steinberg, Philip J. & Urbig, Diemo & Procher, Vivien D. & Volkmann, Christine, 2021. "Knowledge transfer and home-market innovativeness: A comparison of emerging and advanced economy multinationals," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4).
    3. Park, June & Chung, Eunbin, 2021. "Learning from past pandemic governance: Early response and Public-Private Partnerships in testing of COVID-19 in South Korea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Urbig, Diemo & Procher, Vivien D. & Steinberg, Philip J. & Volkmann, Christine, 2022. "The role of firm-level and country-level antecedents in explaining emerging versus advanced economy multinationals' R&D internationalization strategies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vlado Simeunovic & Sanja Milic & Andor Pajrok, 2022. "Higher Education in the Eyes of Economic Operators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Wade Jacoby, 2014. "Different cases, different faces: Chinese investment in Central and Eastern Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 199-214, March.
    3. Carla Carolina Pérez Hernández & Graciela Lara Gómez & Denise Gómez Hernández, 2017. "Evolution of state clusters related with technological capability in Mexico: Application of a multivariate statistical analysis of cluster," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(2), pages 22-23, Abril-Jun.
    4. Andrieş, Alin Marius & Nistor, Simona, 2016. "Systemic risk, corporate governance and regulation of banks across emerging countries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 59-63.
    5. ., 2010. "The Korean Economy: Transition to a Knowledge-based Economy," Chapters, in: The Korean Economy in Transition, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Peter Knight & Jorma Routti, 2011. "e-Development and Consensus Formation in Finland," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(1), pages 117-144, March.
    7. repec:idb:brikps:319 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Iulia Monica OEHLER- ȘINCAI, 2015. "Is Romania Attractive For Japanese Investors? A Comparative Analysis At The Eu Level," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 10(4), pages 226-245, december.
    9. Munteanu Sebastian Madalin, 2015. "The Economic And Social Coordinates Of Developing A Sport Entrepreneurship Index – Current Challenges And Prerequisites," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 224-229, June.
    10. Achmad Fajar Hendarman & Uwe Cantner, 2018. "Soft skills, hard skills, and individual innovativeness," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(2), pages 139-169, June.
    11. Reyes Valle, C. & Villanueva Perales, A.L. & Vidal-Barrero, F. & Ollero, P., 2015. "Integrated economic and life cycle assessment of thermochemical production of bioethanol to reduce production cost by exploiting excess of greenhouse gas savings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 466-475.
    12. De Oliveira, Fernando C. & Coelho, Suani T., 2017. "History, evolution, and environmental impact of biodiesel in Brazil: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 168-179.
    13. Todd Davey & Sue Rossano & Peter Sijde, 2016. "Does context matter in academic entrepreneurship? The role of barriers and drivers in the regional and national context," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1457-1482, December.
    14. Piaggesi, Danilo & Mokyr, Joel & Mitchell, Graham R. & Villaschi Filho, Arlindo & Murray, T. Scott & Hammond, Allen & Katz, Rob & Paul, John & Tran, Julia & Cordella, Antonio & Furlong, Shauneen & Ray, 2005. "The Knowledge Economy in Development: Perspectives for Effective Partnerships," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 319.
    15. Sun, Hao & Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong, 2015. "Feasibility study of a hybrid wind turbine system – Integration with compressed air energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 617-628.
    16. Ahmed, Sumair Faisal & Khalid, M. & Rashmi, W. & Chan, A. & Shahbaz, Kaveh, 2017. "Recent progress in solar thermal energy storage using nanomaterials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 450-460.
    17. Tomosk, Steve & Haysom, Joan E. & Wright, David, 2017. "Quantifying economic risk in photovoltaic power projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 422-433.
    18. Oh, Yunjung & Park, Junhong & Lee, Jong Tae & Seo, Jigu & Park, Sungwook, 2016. "Development strategies to satisfy corporate average CO2 emission regulations of light duty vehicles (LDVs) in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 121-132.
    19. Giuliana Urso & Lina Stoeva & Yana Stoeva & Federica Migliardi & Guo Ankang & Shao Yijan, 2009. "Knowledge Sharing is Power," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 16(2), pages 352-367, June.
    20. Leonid Gokhberg & Dirk Meissner & Natalia Shmatko, 2017. "Myths and Realities of Highly Qualified Labor and What It Means for PhDs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 758-767, June.
    21. Alireza Poorfaraj & Hadi Keshavarz, 2011. "Knowledge and Economic Growth: Evidence from Some Developing Countries," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 1(1), pages 21-25.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:23:y:2016:i:1:p:65-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.