IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Objective 1 Funds on Regional Growth Convergence in the European Union: A Panel-data Approach


  • Roberto Esposti
  • Stefania Bussoletti


Esposti R. and Bussoletti S. Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: a panel-data approach, Regional Studies 41, 1-15. This paper investigates the impact of Objective 1 structural funds expenditure on European Union regions by estimating an augmented conditional convergence econometric model. According to this model, growth convergence is influenced by the policy treatment, which affects the regional initial investment rate by interacting with other regional structural variables and eventually influencing its steady-state level. The convergence model is specified in a dynamic panel-data form and estimated using a database of 206 EU-15 regions observed from 1989 to 2000. A generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation is applied to obtain consistent estimates of both parameter β and impact of the Objective 1 policies. [image omitted] Esposti R. et Bussoletti S. L'impact des fonds Objectif 1 sur la convergence des taux de croissance dans l'Ue: une facon par enquete permanente, Regional Studies 41, 1-15. Par moyen de l'estimation d'un modele econometrique de convergence a conditions augmentees, cet article cherche a examiner l'impact des fonds structurels Objectif 1 engages sur les regions de l'Ue. Selon ce modele, la convergence des taux de croissance est influee par la politique, ce qui a un effet sur le taux d'investissement initial regional en ayant une action reciproque avec d'autres variables structurelles regionales et, a terme, en influant sur son niveau continu. Le modele de convergence se voit preciser sous forme d'une enquete permanente dynamique et estimer a partir d'une base de donnees aupres de 206 regions de l'Ue des 15 entre 1989 et l'an 2000. Afin d'obtenir des estimations systematiques, une estimation GMM se voit appliquer a la fois au parametre ss et a l'impact des politiques Objectif 1. Convergence regionale Fonds Objectif 1 Enquete permanente Estimation GMM Esposti R. und Bussoletti S. Auswirkungen der Ziel-1-Fonds auf die regionale Wachstumskonvergenz in der EU, Regional Studies 41, 1-15. In diesem Artikel werden die Auswirkungen der Zuwendungen aus den Ziel-1-Strukturfonds fur die EU-Regionen anhand eines erweiterten konditionalen Konvergenz-Okonometriemodells untersucht. Nach diesem Modell wird die Wachstumskonvergenz durch die politische Behandlung beeinflusst, die sich auf die regionale initiale Investitionsrate auswirkt, indem sie mit anderen regionalen Strukturvariablen in Wechselwirkung tritt und schliesslich das stationare Niveau der Investitionsrate beeinflusst. Das Konvergenzmodell wird in Form dynamischer Paneldaten spezifiziert und mit Hilfe einer Datenbank von 206 EU-15-Regionen geschatzt, die zwischen 1989 und 2000 beobachtet wurden. Um sowohl vom Parameter β als auch von den Auswirkungen der Ziel-1-Politiken einheitliche Schatzungen zu erhalten, wird eine GMM-Schatzung vorgenommen. Regionale Konvergenz Ziel-1-Fonds Paneldaten GMM-Schatzung Esposti R. y Bussoletti S. Impacto de los fondos del Objetivo 1 en la convergencia de crecimiento regional en la UE, Regional Studies 41, 1-15. En este articulo investigamos cual es el impacto de los gastos de fondos estructurales del Objetivo 1 en las regiones de la UE mediante un calculo segun un modelo econometrico aumentado de convergencia condicional. Segun este modelo, la convergencia de crecimiento esta influenciada por el tratamiento politico que afecta a la tasa de inversion inicial en las regiones al interactuar con otras variables estructurales regionales y que posteriormente afecta a su nivel estable. El modelo de convergencia esta especificado en tipo de datos dinamicos de panel y se ha calculado usando una base de datos de 206 regiones EU-15 que se observaron de 1989 a 2000. Hacemos un calculo mediante el metodo GMM para obtener estimaciones coherentes del parametro β y del impacto de las politicas del Objetivo 1. Convergencia regional Fondos del Objetivo 1 Datos del panel Estimacion GMM

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Esposti & Stefania Bussoletti, 2008. "Impact of Objective 1 Funds on Regional Growth Convergence in the European Union: A Panel-data Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 159-173.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:42:y:2008:i:2:p:159-173 DOI: 10.1080/00343400601142753

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Kevin Morgan, 2007. "The Polycentric State: New Spaces of Empowerment and Engagement?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1237-1251.
    2. Ann Markusen, 2003. "Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 701-717.
    3. Michael Fritsch & Oliver Falck, 2007. "New Business Formation by Industry over Space and Time: A Multidimensional Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 157-172.
    4. Arnoud Lagendijk, 2007. "The Accident of the Region: A Strategic Relational Perspective on the Construction of the Region's Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1193-1208.
    5. Andres Marchante & Bienvenido Ortega, 2006. "Quality of life and economic convergence across Spanish regions, 1980-2001," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 471-483.
    6. Allen J. Scott & Michael Storper, 2007. "Regions, Globalization, Development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(sup1), pages 191-205.
    7. Maurizio Baussola, 2007. "Modelling a Regional Economic System: The Case of Lombardy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 19-38.
    8. Henry G. Overman, 2004. "Can we learn anything from economic geography proper?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, pages 501-516.
    9. Susan Christopherson & Jennifer Clark, 2007. "Power in Firm Networks: What it Means for Regional Innovation Systems," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1223-1236.
    10. Beth Perry & Tim May, 2007. "Governance, Science Policy and Regions: An Introduction," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1039-1050.
    11. Bertrand Zuindeau, 2006. "Spatial approach to sustainable development: Challenges of equity and efficacy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, pages 459-470.
    12. David Mcgranahan & Timothy Wojan, 2007. "Recasting the Creative Class to Examine Growth Processes in Rural and Urban Counties," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 197-216.
    13. Ron Johnston & Simon Burgess & Deborah Wilson & Richard Harris, 2006. "School and Residential Ethnic Segregation: An Analysis of Variations across England's Local Education Authorities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 973-990.
    14. Ray Hudson, 2007. "Regions and Regional Uneven Development Forever? Some Reflective Comments upon Theory and Practice," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1149-1160.
    15. Philip Mccann, 2007. "Observational Equivalence? Regional Studies and Regional Science," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1209-1222.
    16. John Bachtler & Colin Wren, 2006. "Evaluation of European Union Cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 143-153.
    17. Melanie Jones & Paul Latreille & Peter Sloane, 2006. "Disability, Gender and the Labour Market in Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 823-845.
    18. Johan Lundberg, 2004. "Using Spatial Econometrics to Analyze Local Growth in Sweden," ERSA conference papers ersa04p25, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Costis Hadjimichalis & Ray Hudson, 2006. "Networks, Regional Development and Democratic Control," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 858-872, December.
    20. Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2004. "Subnational governance and economic and social development," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 36(12), pages 2091-2096, December.
    21. Johan Lundberg, 2006. "Using spatial econometrics to analyse local growth in Sweden," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 303-316.
    22. Dominic Brown & Philip Rees, 2006. "Trends in local and small area mortality and morbidity in Yorkshire and the Humber: Monitoring health inequalities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 437-458.
    23. Arnoud Lagendijk, 2006. "Learning from conceptual flow in regional studies: Framing present debates, unbracketing past debates," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 385-399.
    24. Glen Bramley & Tony Champion & Tania Fisher, 2006. "Exploring the Household Impacts of Migration in Britain Using Panel Survey Data," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 907-926.
    25. Andy Pike & Andres Rodriguez-Pose & John Tomaney, 2007. "What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1253-1269.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:42:y:2008:i:2:p:159-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.