IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Groundnut Sector Liberalization in Senegal: A Multi-household CGE Analysis

Listed author(s):
  • Dorothee Boccanfuso
  • Luc Savard

In Senegal, the poverty reduction strategy is taking place in a context where international trade liberalization impacts the agricultural sector as a whole, and the groundnut sector in particular. Against this backdrop, we have developed a micro-simulated multiple-household computable general equilibrium model similar to the one proposed by Decaluwe et al. (1999b, How to Measure Poverty and Inequfality in General Equilibrium Framework, CREFA Working Paper No. 9920, Universite Laval, Quebec). Five simulations have been carried out in order to assess their impact on several levels—namely the macroeconomic, sector-based and household levels. The first two simulations concern tariff reforms, whereas the last three examine the external shocks resulting from a change in export prices on the world market (namely, for groundnuts and groundnut oil). The point of these simulations is to assess how the liberalization of the groundnut industry and the privatization of the Societe Nationale de Commercialisation des Oleagineux du Senegal—two major elements in the Framework Agreement—may impact households, and thus to see in what ways these economic reforms relate to poverty and income distribution. The results show that reducing the special tax on edible oils is positive in terms of poverty effects and the reduction of world prices of groundnut has relatively strong negative effects on poor households if farmers are not protected via a fixed price.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Oxford Development Studies.

Volume (Year): 36 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 159-186

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:36:y:2008:i:2:p:159-186
DOI: 10.1080/13600810802037845
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:36:y:2008:i:2:p:159-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.