IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jbemgt/v17y2016i3p365-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fourier Analysis for Stock Price Forecasting: Assumption and Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Bohumil Stádník
  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė
  • Vida Davidavičienė

Abstract

The research addressed the relevant question whether the Fourier analysis really provides practical value for investors forecasting stock market price. To answer this question, the significant cycles were discovered using the Fourier analysis inside the price series of US stocks; then, the simulation of an agent buying and selling on minima and maxima of these cycles was made. The results were then compared to those of an agent operating chaotically. Moreover, the existing significant cycles were found using more precise methods, suggested in the research, and based on the results of an agent buying and selling on all possible periods and phases. It has been analysed whether these really existing cycles were in accordance with the significant cycles resulting from the Fourier analysis. It has been concluded that the Fourier analysis basically failed. Suchlike failures are expected on similar data series. In addition, momentum and level trading backtests have been used in a similar way. It has been found that the level trading does provide a certain practical value in comparison to the momentum trading method. The research also simplifies the complicated theoretical background for practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Bohumil Stádník & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Vida Davidavičienė, 2016. "Fourier Analysis for Stock Price Forecasting: Assumption and Evidence," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 365-380, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:17:y:2016:i:3:p:365-380
    DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2016.1184180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3846/16111699.2016.1184180
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jbemgt:v:17:y:2016:i:3:p:365-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TBEM20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.