IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/apfiba/v15y2025i4f15_4_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Deep Learning with Multilayer Perceptron Perform Well in Predicting Credit Risk?

Author

Listed:
  • Ulysses Araújo Bispo
  • Mathias Schneid Tessmann

Abstract

This paper investigates the effectiveness of using Deep Learning with Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to assess credit risk in banks. To this end, its performance is compared with that of Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree (Random Forest), and Logistic Regression algorithms using credit risk analysis data from customers of two of the largest Brazilian financial institutions, focusing exclusively on Direct Consumer Credit operations. Performance is measured using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, AUC-ROC, and cross-validation. The MLP model presented the best overall performance, with accuracies of 84.45% (Bank A) and 94.00% (Bank B) and higher recall values, while Gradient Boosting achieved the highest AUC-ROC scores (87.90% and 94.10%). All machine learning models outperformed Logistic Regression (79.0% and 78.38%), demonstrating that the adoption of these techniques — especially MLP — can significantly improve default prediction in direct consumer credit.  JEL Classification: C45, C52, G21, G32.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulysses Araújo Bispo & Mathias Schneid Tessmann, 2025. "Does Deep Learning with Multilayer Perceptron Perform Well in Predicting Credit Risk?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 15(4), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:15:y:2025:i:4:f:15_4_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%2015_4_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:15:y:2025:i:4:f:15_4_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.