IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v36y2022i1d10.1007_s11269-021-03006-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature-based Groundwater Hydrograph Clustering Using Unsupervised Self-Organizing Map-Ensembles

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Wunsch

    (Institute of Applied Geosciences, Division of Hydrogeology)

  • Tanja Liesch

    (Institute of Applied Geosciences, Division of Hydrogeology)

  • Stefan Broda

    (Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR))

Abstract

Hydrograph clustering helps to identify dynamic patterns within aquifers systems, an important foundation of characterizing groundwater systems and their influences, which is necessary to effectively manage groundwater resources. We develope an unsupervised modeling approach to characterize and cluster hydrographs on regional scale according to their dynamics. We apply feature-based clustering to improve the exploitation of heterogeneous datasets, explore the usefulness of existing features and propose new features specifically useful to describe groundwater hydrographs. The clustering itself is based on a powerful combination of Self-Organizing Maps with a modified DS2L-Algorithm, which automatically derives the cluster number but also allows to influence the level of detail of the clustering. We further develop a framework that combines these methods with ensemble modeling, internal cluster validation indices, resampling and consensus voting to finally obtain a robust clustering result and remove arbitrariness from the feature selection process. Further we propose a measure to sort hydrographs within clusters, useful for both interpretability and visualization. We test the framework with weekly data from the Upper Rhine Graben System, using more than 1800 hydrographs from a period of 30 years (1986-2016). The results show that our approach is adaptively capable of identifying homogeneous groups of hydrograph dynamics. The resulting clusters show both spatially known and unknown patterns, some of which correspond clearly to external controlling factors, such as intensive groundwater management in the northern part of the test area. This framework is easily transferable to other regions and, by adapting the describing features, also to other time series-clustering applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Wunsch & Tanja Liesch & Stefan Broda, 2022. "Feature-based Groundwater Hydrograph Clustering Using Unsupervised Self-Organizing Map-Ensembles," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(1), pages 39-54, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-021-03006-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-03006-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-021-03006-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-021-03006-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mangiameli, Paul & Chen, Shaw K. & West, David, 1996. "A comparison of SOM neural network and hierarchical clustering methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 402-417, September.
    2. Mingoti, Sueli A. & Lima, Joab O., 2006. "Comparing SOM neural network with Fuzzy c-means, K-means and traditional hierarchical clustering algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1742-1759, November.
    3. P. (Sundar) Balakrishnan & Martha Cooper & Varghese Jacob & Phillip Lewis, 1994. "A study of the classification capabilities of neural networks using unsupervised learning: A comparison withK-means clustering," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 509-525, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renee Obringer & Dave D. White, 2023. "Leveraging Unsupervised Learning to Develop a Typology of Residential Water Users’ Attitudes Towards Conservation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 37-53, January.
    2. Andreas Wunsch & Tanja Liesch & Stefan Broda, 2022. "Deep learning shows declining groundwater levels in Germany until 2100 due to climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingoti, Sueli A. & Lima, Joab O., 2006. "Comparing SOM neural network with Fuzzy c-means, K-means and traditional hierarchical clustering algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1742-1759, November.
    2. Pérez-Campuzano, Darío & Rubio Andrada, Luis & Morcillo Ortega, Patricio & López-Lázaro, Antonio, 2022. "Visualizing the historical COVID-19 shock in the US airline industry: A Data Mining approach for dynamic market surveillance," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Pankaj Kumar Medhi & Sandeep Mondal, 2016. "A neural feature extraction model for classification of firms and prediction of outsourcing success: advantage of using relational sources of information for new suppliers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 6071-6081, October.
    4. Mayra Z Rodriguez & Cesar H Comin & Dalcimar Casanova & Odemir M Bruno & Diego R Amancio & Luciano da F Costa & Francisco A Rodrigues, 2019. "Clustering algorithms: A comparative approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, January.
    5. Sridhar Ramamoorti & Andrew D. Bailey Jr & Richard O. Traver, 1999. "Risk assessment in internal auditing: a neural network approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(3), pages 159-180, September.
    6. Manuel Chaves-Maza & Eugenio M. Fedriani Martel, 2020. "Entrepreneurship support ways after the COVID-19 crisis," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 662-681, December.
    7. repec:onb:oenbwp:y:2005:i:9:b:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Hruschka, Harald & Natter, Martin, 1999. "Comparing performance of feedforward neural nets and K-means for cluster-based market segmentation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 346-353, April.
    9. Guobin Fu & Stephanie R. Clark & Dennis Gonzalez & Rodrigo Rojas & Sreekanth Janardhanan, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Groundwater Levels: A Case Study of Alluvial Aquifers in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Niels Waller & Heather Kaiser & Janine Illian & Mike Manry, 1998. "A comparison of the classification capabilities of the 1-dimensional kohonen neural network with two pratitioning and three hierarchical cluster analysis algorithms," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 5-22, March.
    11. Balakrishnan, P. V. (Sundar) & Cooper, Martha C. & Jacob, Varghese S. & Lewis, Phillip A., 1996. "Comparative performance of the FSCL neural net and K-means algorithm for market segmentation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 346-357, September.
    12. Paradi, Joseph C. & Zhu, Haiyan & Edelstein, Barak, 2012. "Identifying managerial groups in a large Canadian bank branch network with a DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 178-187.
    13. Lozano, S. & Guerrero, F. & Onieva, L. & Larraneta, J., 1998. "Kohonen maps for solving a class of location-allocation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 106-117, July.
    14. Onsel Sahin, Sule & Ulengin, Fusun & Ulengin, Burc, 2004. "Using neural networks and cognitive mapping in scenario analysis: The case of Turkey's inflation dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 124-145, October.
    15. Antonio Russo & Ian Smith, 2012. "Attractive regions: for whom? And how does that matter?," ERSA conference papers ersa12p362, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Ramin Baghai‐Wadji & Rami El‐Berry & Stefan Klocker & Markus Schwaiger, 2006. "Changing investment styles: style creep and style gaming in the hedge fund industry," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(4), pages 157-177, October.
    17. George Albanis & Roy Batchelor, 2007. "Combining heterogeneous classifiers for stock selection," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1‐2), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Sultan Mahmud & Ferdausi Mahojabin Sumana & Md Mohsin & Md. Hasinur Rahaman Khan, 2022. "Redefining homogeneous climate regions in Bangladesh using multivariate clustering approaches," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1863-1884, March.
    19. Ozer, Muammer, 2005. "Fuzzy c-means clustering and Internet portals: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 696-714, August.
    20. Ulengin, Fusun & Ulengin, Burc & Onsel, Sule, 2002. "A power-based measurement approach to specify macroeconomic competitiveness of countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 203-226, September.
    21. Marcus Deetz, 2019. "K-Means Clustering of Self-Organizing Maps: An Empirical Study on the Information Content of Self-Classification of Hedge Fund Managers," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 5(3), pages 43-57, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-021-03006-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.