Author
Abstract
It is frequently observed in dose response trials that increasing the dosage of a particular ingredient has a monotone effect on cure rate, survival times and mortality levels. Here, we consider the problem of testing the homogeneity of treatment effects against ordered alternatives in a two-way additive ANCOVA with heterogeneous error variances. The likelihood ratio test is developed for the case of one covariate and further extended to the case of several covariates. Algorithms to obtain the maximum likelihood estimators of model parameters under the null and full parameter spaces are proposed. The convergence of the iterative schemes to the true MLEs is established. Two union–intersection type tests are also proposed. The tests are modified for possible extension to tree and umbrella order alternatives. For the implementation of all the tests, a parametric bootstrap approach is used and is shown to be asymptotically accurate. An extensive simulation study is carried out to assess the size and power performance of proposed tests. It is observed that the bootstrap methods are indeed satisfactory, even for small and moderate samples and highly heterogeneous variances. Robustness of these tests is also investigated under the deviation from normality of the error distribution. The proposed tests are illustrated using a breast cancer data set on survival ages and a clinical nutrition study data set on body weights. An ‘R’ package has been developed and shared on ‘GitHub’ for implementation on real data sets.
Suggested Citation
Anjana Mondal & Somesh Kumar, 2025.
"Testing for trend in two-way heteroscedastic ANCOVA models,"
TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 34(3), pages 714-741, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:testjl:v:34:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11749-025-00977-7
DOI: 10.1007/s11749-025-00977-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:34:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11749-025-00977-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.