Author
Listed:
- Alyson L. Dodd
(Northumbria University)
- Georgia Punton
(Northumbria University
Durham University)
- Lisa Thomas
(Northumbria University)
- Elizabeth Orme
(Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
- Stewart Martin
(Northumbria University
What Works Centre for Wellbeing)
- Nancy Hey
(What Works Centre for Wellbeing
Lloyds Register Foundation)
- Nicola C. Byrom
(Kings College London)
Abstract
Settings approaches are vital for positive health promotion at scale, including mental well-being. These can be designed to fit the local context where people live, work and study. Universities are large employers, and there is a drive for settings-based approaches in the workplace. Community well-being is about “being well together” as a collective, and can be applied to communities based on location as well as communities of shared values, interest and purpose, such as an organisation. Designing well-being initiatives and interventions could be informed through the community well-being lens. This study aimed to explore what university staff think are components of community well-being in the workplace. Semi-structured interviews guided by photo-elicitation (n = 15) explored the concept of community well-being. Three themes were created through Reflexive Thematic Analysis of the data: Social and Connected University; Physical Environment; and Compassionate and Supportive Culture. Activities, events and spaces that facilitate getting together, a campus and spaces within it that fosters identity and belonging to the university community, and a culture that nourishes connection, collegiality and participation are all key components of community well-being in universities. Understanding these components has implications for designing well-being initiatives that go beyond the individual. The components identified here also give insights into how community well-being could be operationalised in the workplace setting.
Suggested Citation
Alyson L. Dodd & Georgia Punton & Lisa Thomas & Elizabeth Orme & Stewart Martin & Nancy Hey & Nicola C. Byrom, 2025.
"What Does Community Well-Being Mean in the University Setting? Staff Perspectives on Connection, Compassion, and Culture,"
Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 1025-1047, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03651-5
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03651-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03651-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.