IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v113y2013i1p67-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement Invariance of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scales Across Italian and Belarusian Students

Author

Listed:
  • Saulo Sirigatti
  • Ilaria Penzo
  • Luca Iani
  • Annamaria Mazzeschi
  • Halina Hatalskaja
  • Enrichetta Giannetti
  • Cristina Stefanile

Abstract

Cross-cultural researches on the Ryff’s Psychological Well-being (PWB) Scales are currently not available. The aim of the paper was to investigate the measurement invariance of the 18-item version of the PWB Scales across 1,114 high school and undergraduate Italian and Belarusian students. After identifying the six correlated first-order factors and one second-order factor model of the Ryff’s PWB Scales, as baseline model for each sample, multi-groups confirmatory factor analyses were subsequently performed. All analyses were performed using the Robust Diagonally Weighted Least Squares estimation procedures, entering a polychoric correlation matrix. Multi-groups analyses showed that factor structure of the preferred model did not change across the Italian and Belarusian samples. Although the obtained results provided a preliminary support for cross-cultural structural invariance of the PWB Scales, further investigations are required to ensure its generalizability and applicability. Limitations and suggestions for future researches as well as psychosocial applications for educational context were discussed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Saulo Sirigatti & Ilaria Penzo & Luca Iani & Annamaria Mazzeschi & Halina Hatalskaja & Enrichetta Giannetti & Cristina Stefanile, 2013. "Measurement Invariance of Ryff’s Psychological Well-being Scales Across Italian and Belarusian Students," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 67-80, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:113:y:2013:i:1:p:67-80
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-012-0082-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-012-0082-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-012-0082-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Burns & M. Machin, 2009. "Investigating the Structural Validity of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales Across Two Samples," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 359-375, September.
    2. Rosemary Abbott & George Ploubidis & Felicia Huppert & Diana Kuh & Tim Croudace, 2010. "An Evaluation of the Precision of Measurement of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in a Population Sample," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 357-373, July.
    3. Dirk Dierendonck & Dario Díaz & Raquel Rodríguez-Carvajal & Amalio Blanco & Bernardo Moreno-Jiménez, 2008. "Ryff’s Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being, A Spanish Exploration," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 473-479, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Iani & Marco Lauriola & Kristin Layous & Saulo Sirigatti, 2014. "Happiness in Italy: Translation, Factorial Structure and Norming of the Subjective Happiness Scale in a Large Community Sample," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 953-967, September.
    2. Mina Jyung & Sung-Ha Lee & Incheol Choi, 2024. "Unraveling the Most Important Predictors of Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-Being in Korean Adults: A Machine Learning Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Darío Díaz & Amalio Blanco & Miriam Bajo & Maria Stavraki, 2015. "Fatalism and Well-Being Across Hispanic Cultures: The Social Fatalism Scales (SFS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 929-945, December.
    4. Alberto Dionigi & Giulia Casu & Paola Gremigni, 2020. "Associations of Self-Efficacy, Optimism, and Empathy with Psychological Health in Healthcare Volunteers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Oliver Nahkur & Ferran Casas, 2021. "Fit and Cross-Country Comparability of Children’s Worlds Psychological Well-Being Scale Using 12-Year-Olds Samples," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(6), pages 2211-2247, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manchiraju, Srikant, 2020. "Psychometric evaluation of the Ryff’s Scale of psychological wellbeing in self-identified American entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    2. Darío Díaz & Amalio Blanco & Miriam Bajo & Maria Stavraki, 2015. "Fatalism and Well-Being Across Hispanic Cultures: The Social Fatalism Scales (SFS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 929-945, December.
    3. Richard A. Burns & Dimity A. Crisp, 2022. "Prioritizing Happiness has Important Implications for Mental Health, but Perhaps Only if you Already are Happy," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 375-390, February.
    4. Suzanna J. Opree & Moniek Buijzen & Eva A. Van Reijmersdal, 2018. "Development and Validation of the Psychological Well-Being Scale for Children (PWB-c)," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Reuben Ng & Heather G. Allore & Becca R. Levy, 2020. "Self-Acceptance and Interdependence Promote Longevity: Evidence From a 20-year Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Carmen Viejo & Mercedes Gómez-López & Rosario Ortega-Ruiz, 2018. "Adolescents’ Psychological Well-Being: A Multidimensional Measure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, October.
    7. Pilar Sanjuán & Fernando Molero & María Fuster & Encarnación Nouvilas, 2013. "Coping with HIV Related Stigma and Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 709-722, April.
    8. Darío Díaz & Maria Stavraki & Amalio Blanco & Miriam Bajo, 2018. "11-M Victims 3 Years After Madrid Terrorist Attacks: Looking for Health Beyond Trauma," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 663-675, March.
    9. Fang Chen & Yiming Jing & Adele Hayes & Jeong Lee, 2013. "Two Concepts or Two Approaches? A Bifactor Analysis of Psychological and Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 1033-1068, June.
    10. Emma Nicole Lomberg & Jacques Jordaan, 2024. "Emotional Intelligence, Adjustment, Media and Technology Usage, and Gender as Predictors of Psychological Well-being Amongst Undergraduate University Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    11. M. Pilar Matud & Marisela López-Curbelo & Demelza Fortes, 2019. "Gender and Psychological Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Himani Mishra & M. Venkatesan, 2023. "Psychological Well-being of Employees, its Precedents and Outcomes: A Literature Review and Proposed Framework," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 48(1), pages 7-41, February.
    13. Simona Šarotar Žižek & Sonja Treven & Vesna Čančer, 2015. "Employees in Slovenia and Their Psychological Well-Being Based on Ryff’s Model of Psychological Well-Being," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 483-502, April.
    14. George Mayaka Nyakweba & Vincent Munywoki, phD & Maria Ntarangwe, PhD, 2022. "Prevalence on Witchcraft Beliefs and The Psychological Well-Being of Elderly People in Masaba South Sub-County Kisii County Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(8), pages 234-242, August.
    15. Hudig, J. & Scheepers, A.W.A. & Schippers, M.C. & Smeets, G., 2021. "A multidimensional approach to motives for studying explains differences in student wellbeing: Validation of the motivational mindset model," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2021-007-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    16. Jooyoung Kong, 2018. "Childhood Maltreatment and Psychological Well-Being in Later Life: The Mediating Effect of Contemporary Relationships with the Abusive Parent," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 39-48.
    17. Natalio Extremera & Nicolás Sánchez-Álvarez & Lourdes Rey, 2020. "Pathways between Ability Emotional Intelligence and Subjective Well-Being: Bridging Links through Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-11, March.
    18. Oliver Nahkur & Ferran Casas, 2021. "Fit and Cross-Country Comparability of Children’s Worlds Psychological Well-Being Scale Using 12-Year-Olds Samples," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(6), pages 2211-2247, December.
    19. Marié P. Wissing & Lusilda Schutte & Christelle Liversage & Brenda Entwisle & Marianne Gericke & Corey Keyes, 2021. "Important Goals, Meanings, and Relationships in Flourishing and Languishing States: Towards Patterns of Well-being," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 573-609, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:113:y:2013:i:1:p:67-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.