IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snbeco/v3y2023i8d10.1007_s43546-023-00513-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework for measuring the efficiency and efficacy of sale of distressed mortgaged properties using imports of statistical tests deployed in clinical studies

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Obaje Ataguba

    (The Federal Polytechnic Idah)

  • Celestine Udoka Ugonabo

    (Nnamdi Azikiwe University)

Abstract

We developed analytical frameworks for measuring and testing the efficiency and efficacy of distressed mortgaged property sales using statistical tools deployed in clinical trials. The first framework proposes efficient sale of distressed mortgaged properties on the condition that the number of distressed properties sold during an epoch exceeds the number of unsold distressed properties during the same epoch; whereas, the second framework proposes the potency of distress mortgaged property sales on the condition that the actual sales price of the property can successfully liquidate the outstanding loan and accumulated interest charged against the mortgaged property/asset. Within the context of the analytical frameworks for this study, we demonstrated the assessment of efficiency and efficacy of distressed mortgaged property sold using private treaty listings as well as appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. It was observed that the efficiency of distressed mortgaged property sales could be measured using the difference between volume of sold and unsold properties during an epoch contrary to the concept of time-on-the-market (TOM) that lacks a scholarly consensus regarding standard measure to avow efficiency or otherwise of the sales. Efficacy assessment in this context has accorded inferential statistical dimension to the measurement of the success or failure of non-recourse debt recovery. Beyond the illustrative simulation exercise in this study, it is recommended that further studies on the subject should deploy actual data cutting across the three methods of distressed sales, namely private treaty, tender/competitive bidding, and auctions, respectively, so that comparisons could be made across these methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Obaje Ataguba & Celestine Udoka Ugonabo, 2023. "Framework for measuring the efficiency and efficacy of sale of distressed mortgaged properties using imports of statistical tests deployed in clinical studies," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-32, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:3:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s43546-023-00513-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s43546-023-00513-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43546-023-00513-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43546-023-00513-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. I. Omede, 2020. "A Tale of Two Markets: How Lower-end Borrowers Are Punished for Bank Regulatory Failures in Nigeria," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 519-542, September.
    2. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1992. "Liquidation Values and Debt Capacity: A Market Equilibrium Approach," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1343-1366, September.
    3. Larry DeBoer & James Conrad & Kevin T. McNamara, 1992. "Property Tax Auction Sales," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 68(1), pages 72-82.
    4. Rajiv Kalra & Kam C. Chan, 1994. "Censored Sample Bias, Macroeconomic Factors, and Time on Market of Residential Housing," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 9(2), pages 253-262.
    5. Norman G. Miller, 1978. "Time on the Market and Selling Price," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 6(2), pages 164-174, June.
    6. Justin Benefield & William Hardin, 2015. "Does Time-on-Market Measurement Matter?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 52-73, January.
    7. Brooks,Chris & Tsolacos,Sotiris, 2010. "Real Estate Modelling and Forecasting," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521873390.
    8. Gwilym Pryce & Gibb Kenneth, 2003. "Modelling Time to Sale of Second Hand Owner Occupied Residential Properties in Glasgow," ERES eres2003_245, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    9. Gavin A. Wood & Susan J. Smith & Melek Cigdem & Rachel Ong, 2017. "Life on the edge: a perspective on precarious home ownership in Australia and the UK," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 201-226, April.
    10. Timothy Curry & Joseph Blalock & Rebel Cole, 1991. "Recoveries on Distressed Real Estate and The Relative Efficiency of Public versus Private Management," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 19(4), pages 495-515, December.
    11. Donald Haurin, 1988. "The Duration of Marketing Time of Residential Housing," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 16(4), pages 396-410, December.
    12. Devan V. Mehrotra & Ivan S. F. Chan & Roger L. Berger, 2003. "A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 441-450, June.
    13. Seow Eng Ong & Kenneth Lusht & Chee Yong Mak, 2005. "Factors Influencing Auction Outcomes: Bidder Turnout, Auction Houses and Market Conditions," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 27(2), pages 177-192.
    14. Harding, John P. & Rosenblatt, Eric & Yao, Vincent W., 2009. "The contagion effect of foreclosed properties," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 164-178, November.
    15. David Downs & Pisun (Tracy) Xu, 2015. "Commercial Real Estate, Distress and Financial Resolution: Portfolio Lending Versus Securitization," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 254-287, August.
    16. Andra C. Ghent & Marianna Kudlyak, 2011. "Recourse and Residential Mortgage Default: Evidence from US States 1," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(9), pages 3139-3186.
    17. Kaushik Basu, 2011. "Non-recourse mortgages and credit market breakdowns: a framework for policy analysis," Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1-8.
    18. Jeffrey P. Cohen & Cletus C. Coughlin & Vincent W. Yao, 2016. "Sales of Distressed Residential Property: What Have We Learned from Recent Research?," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 98(3), pages 159-188.
    19. Gavin A. Wood & Susan J. Smith & Melek Cigdem & Rachel Ong, 2017. "Life on the edge: a perspective on precarious home ownership in Australia and the UK," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 201-226, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Stevenson & James Young, 2015. "The Role of Undisclosed Reserves in English Open Outcry Auctions," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 43(2), pages 375-402, June.
    2. Liang, Cong & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Yip, Tsz Leung, 2018. "Time on market (TOM): The impact of new residential stamp duty," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 1117-1130.
    3. John D. Benjamin & G. Donald Jud & G. Stacy Sirmans, 2000. "What Do We Know About Real Estate Brokerage?," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 20(1), pages 5-30.
    4. Marcus T. Allen & Justin D. Benefield & Christopher L. Cain & Norman Maynard, 2024. "Distressed Property Sales: Differences and Similarities Across Types of Distress," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 318-353, February.
    5. David Koch & Gunther Maier, 2015. "The influence of estate agencies’ location and time on Internet," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 35(2), pages 147-171, October.
    6. Anglin, Paul M & Rutherford, Ronald & Springer, Thomas M, 2003. "The Trade-Off Between the Selling Price of Residential Properties and Time-on-the-Market: The Impact of Price Setting," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 95-111, January.
    7. Kimberly R. Goodwin & Ken H. Johnson, 2017. "The Short Sale Stigma," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 416-434, November.
    8. Stanley McGreal & Alastair Adair & Louise Brown & James R. Webb, 2009. "Pricing and Time on the Market for Residential Properties in a Major U.K. City," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 31(2), pages 209-234.
    9. Michele Loberto, 2023. "Foreclosures and House Prices," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 9(1), pages 397-424, March.
    10. Rajiv Kalra & Kam C. Chan, 1994. "Censored Sample Bias, Macroeconomic Factors, and Time on Market of Residential Housing," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 9(2), pages 253-262.
    11. Edward A. Baryla & Leonard V. Zumpano, 1995. "Buyer Search Duration in the Residential Real Estate Market: The Role of the Real Estate Agent," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14.
    12. John Y. Campbell & Stefano Giglio & Parag Pathak, 2011. "Forced Sales and House Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(5), pages 2108-2131, August.
    13. Justin Benefield & Ronald Rutherford & Marcus Allen, 2012. "The Effects of Estate Sales of Residential Real Estate on Price and Marketing Time," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 965-981, November.
    14. Stuart Gabriel & Matteo Iacoviello & Chandler Lutz, 2021. "A Crisis of Missed Opportunities? Foreclosure Costs and Mortgage Modification During the Great Recession [Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(2), pages 864-906.
    15. Pat Wilson & Wayne Dwyer, 1993. "In Shared Information Services is Size Important?," Working Paper Series 24, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    16. Herrin, William E. & Knight, John R. & Sirmans, C.F., 2004. "Price cutting behavior in residential markets," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 195-207, September.
    17. Geoffrey Turnbull & Velma Zahirovic-Herbert, 2012. "The Transitory and Legacy Effects of the Rental Externality on House Price and Liquidity," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 275-297, April.
    18. Chomsisengphet, Souphala & Kiefer, Hua & Liu, Xiaodong, 2018. "Spillover effects in home mortgage defaults: Identifying the power neighbor," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 68-82.
    19. Michael J. Seiler, 2017. "Do Liquidated Damages Clauses Affect Strategic Mortgage Default Morality? A Test of the Disjunctive Thesis," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 45(1), pages 204-230, February.
    20. Marcelo Cajias & Philipp Freudenreich & Anna Freudenreich, 2020. "Exploring the determinants of real estate liquidity from an alternative perspective: censored quantile regression in real estate research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(7), pages 1057-1086, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snbeco:v:3:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s43546-023-00513-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.