IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v73y2021i3d10.1007_s41471-021-00119-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Television Serials as Career Stepping Stones: An Empirical Analysis of Employment Paths of Professional Actors

Author

Listed:
  • Kay H. Hofmann

    (Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Guided by cultural labor economics, the paper analyzes the career paths of former actors from popular television soap operas, and addresses in particular, if and under which conditions such serial engagements may function as a stepping stone for a subsequent professional acting career. A novel database of 396 German artists with detailed and long-term biographical information is used for the quantitative empirical analyses. The results indicate that soaps, contrary to popular opinion, function as a stepping stone, especially for younger actors. However, soap engagements should be rather short but long enough to allow artists to play multiple roles in other shows or films besides being in the cast of a soap. While formal acting education does not influence soap actors’ future filmographies, there is evidence that it helps artists to find jobs in arts-related occupations such as voice acting. Finally, publicity and media presence foster a later acting career. Practical implications for artists and their managers are outlined, along with a discussion on the meaning of serials for the creation and commercialization of stars.

Suggested Citation

  • Kay H. Hofmann, 2021. "Television Serials as Career Stepping Stones: An Empirical Analysis of Employment Paths of Professional Actors," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 501-525, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:73:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-021-00119-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s41471-021-00119-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41471-021-00119-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41471-021-00119-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Towse, 2001. "Creativity, Incentive and Reward," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1953.
    2. Carlos Casacuberta & N鳴or Gandelman, 2012. "Multiple job holding: the artist's labour supply approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 323-337, January.
    3. Christian Opitz & Kay H. Hofmann, 2016. "The More You Know … The More You Enjoy? Applying ‘Consumption Capital Theory’ To Motion Picture Franchises," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 181-195, October.
    4. Ruth Towse, 2001. "Partly for the Money: Rewards and Incentives to Artists," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2‐3), pages 473-490, May.
    5. Christian Opitz & Kay H. Hofmann, 2014. "Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in Equity Partnerships: Evidence from Hollywood's Slate Financing Agreements," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 811-838, December.
    6. Vicentini, Francesca & Boccardelli, Paolo, 2016. "Career diversity and project performance in the Italian television industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2380-2387.
    7. David Throsby, 2006. "An Artistic Production Function: Theory and an Application to Australian Visual Artists," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 30(1), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Kay H. Hofmann & Christian Opitz, 2019. "Talent and publicity as determinants of superstar incomes: empirical evidence from the motion picture industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(13), pages 1383-1395, March.
    9. Bruno S. Frey, 2019. "Economics of Art and Culture," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-15748-7, September.
    10. MacDonald, Glenn M, 1988. "The Economics of Rising Stars," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(1), pages 155-166, March.
    11. Dias, José António & Dias, José G. & Lages, Carmen, 2017. "Can negative characters in soap operas be positive for product placement?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 125-132.
    12. Maurizio Caserta & Tiziana Cuccia, 2001. "The Supply of Arts Labour : Towards a Dynamic Approach," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 25(3), pages 185-201, August.
    13. Bruno S. Frey, 2019. "What Is the Economics of Art and Culture?," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Economics of Art and Culture, chapter 0, pages 3-11, Springer.
    14. Sylvia Chan-Olmsted & Byeng-Hee Chang, 2003. "Diversification Strategy of Global Media Conglomerates: Examining Its Patterns and Determinants," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 213-233.
    15. Towse, Ruth, 2001. "Partly for the Money: Rewards and Incentives to Artists," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2-3), pages 473-490.
    16. Centeno, Dave & Wang, Jeff Jianfeng, 2017. "Celebrities as human brands: An inquiry on stakeholder-actor co-creation of brand identities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 133-138.
    17. Zuckerman, Ezra W. & Kim, Tai-Young & Ukanwa, Kalinda & James, von Rittmann, 2003. "Robust Identities or Non-Entities? Typecasting in the Feature Film Labor Market," Working papers 4291-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. David Throsby, 1996. "Economic circumstances of the performing artist: Baumol and Bowen thirty years on," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 20(3), pages 225-240, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Cuntz, 2018. "Creators' Income Situation in the Digital Age," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 49, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    2. Gaenssle Sophia & Budzinski Oliver & Astakhova Daria, 2018. "Conquering the Box Office: Factors Influencing Success of International Movies in Russia," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(4), pages 245-266, December.
    3. Ruth Towse, 2006. "Copyright And Artists: A View From Cultural Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 567-585, September.
    4. Ruth Towse, 2011. "Creativity," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Monika Kackovic & Joop Hartog & Hans van Ophem & Nachoem Wijnberg, 2022. "The promise of potential: A study on the effectiveness of jury selection to a prestigious visual arts program," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 410-435, August.
    6. Alexander Cuntz & Angie L. Miller, 2018. "Unpacking predictors of income and income satisfaction for artists," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 50, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    7. Ruth Towse, 2010. "Creativity, Copyright and the Creative Industries Paradigm," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 461-478, August.
    8. Ivan Png, 2006. "Copyright: A Plea for Empirical Research," Levine's Working Paper Archive 321307000000000484, David K. Levine.
    9. Markus Pasche, 2014. "Welfare Effects of Endogenous Copyright Enforcement - the Case of Digital Goods," Jena Economics Research Papers 2014-008, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Roberta Comunian & Alessandra Faggian & Qian Cher Li, 2010. "Unrewarded careers in the creative class: The strange case of bohemian graduates," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(2), pages 389-410, June.
    11. Bruno S. Frey & Andre Briviba, 2023. "Two types of cultural economics," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(1), pages 1-9, March.
    12. Ruth Towse, 2017. "Economics of music publishing: copyright and the market," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(4), pages 403-420, November.
    13. Merijn Rengers & Erik Plug, 2001. "Private or Public?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 25(1), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Christian Handke & Carolina Dalla Chiesa, 2022. "The art of crowdfunding arts and innovation: the cultural economic perspective," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 46(2), pages 249-284, June.
    15. Maria Abreu & Alessandra Faggian & Roberta Comunian & Philip McCann, 2012. "“Life is short, art is long”: the persistent wage gap between Bohemian and non-Bohemian graduates," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 49(2), pages 305-321, October.
    16. Joel Hellier, 2023. "Asymmetric Globalization, Top Performers’ Income and Inequality," Working Papers 634, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    17. Trine Bille & Knut Løyland & Anders Holm, 2017. "Work for Passion or Money? Variations in Artists’ Labor Supply," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 347-380, August.
    18. Milenko POPOVIĆ & Kruna RATKOVIĆ, 2013. "Oversupply Of Labor And Other Peculiarities Of Arts Labor Market," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 204-230.
    19. Hakjun Lee & Shik Heo, 2022. "Consumption Pattern Benefits of the Cultural Activities in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Ruth Towse, 2008. "Why has cultural economics ignored copyright?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(4), pages 243-259, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:73:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-021-00119-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.