IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v129y2024i3d10.1007_s11192-023-04895-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Target-oriented policy diffusion analysis: a case study of China’s information technology policy

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Yang

    (Zhejiang University)

  • Cui Huang

    (Zhejiang University)

Abstract

Current quantitative research on policy diffusion tends to focus on the citation relationship between policies, while ignoring the nature of policy diffusion, that is, the diffusion of policy targets and instruments contained in policy. As a result, the identified policy path is often a hodgepodge, which contains multiple unrelated policies. It also lacks quantitative and reproducible methods for policy diffusion path analysis. Therefore, this paper proposes a policy target-oriented and citation-based policy diffusion analysis framework. Firstly, we collected relevant policy documents. Secondly, the article identified the policy citation relationships and the policy target patterns embedded in the policy documents. Then, we constructed target-oriented policy citation network and analyzed the patterns and characteristics of policy diffusion. Finally, based on the main path analysis method, we identified the policy diffusion paths of the policy mixes in the multi-target case. A case study of China’s information technology policies was used to demonstrate our method’s reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Yang & Cui Huang, 2024. "Target-oriented policy diffusion analysis: a case study of China’s information technology policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1347-1376, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04895-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04895-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-023-04895-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-023-04895-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manal Etemadi & Kioomars Ashtarian & Hasan Abolghasem Gorji & Hananneh Mohammadi Kangarani, 2019. "Which groups of the poor are supported more by the law? Pro‐poor health policy network in Iran," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 1074-1086, April.
    2. Huang, Cui & Yang, Chao & Su, Jun, 2021. "Identifying core policy instruments based on structural holes: A case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    3. Pavel Bakhtin & Ozcan Saritas & Alexander Chulok & Ilya Kuzminov & Anton Timofeev, 2017. "Trend monitoring for linking science and strategy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 2059-2075, June.
    4. Boyack, Kevin W. & van Eck, Nees Jan & Colavizza, Giovanni & Waltman, Ludo, 2018. "Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 59-73.
    5. Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini Hayashi & Danilo Rothberg & Carlos Roberto Massao Hayashi, 2010. "Scientific knowledge and digital democracy in Brazil: how to assess public health policy debate with applied Scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(3), pages 825-833, June.
    6. Kushwanth Koya & Gobinda Chowdhury, 2020. "Cultural Heritage Information Practices and iSchools Education for Achieving Sustainable Development," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 696-710, June.
    7. Gobinda Chowdhury & Kushwanth Koya, 2017. "Information practices for sustainability: Role of iSchools in achieving the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs)," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(9), pages 2128-2138, September.
    8. Katherine H. Tennis & Rachel Sullivan Robinson, 2020. "Where Do Population Policies Come From? Copying in African Fertility and Refugee Policies," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(2), pages 175-205, April.
    9. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Werner Marx, 2016. "Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1477-1495, December.
    10. Wu, Chaojiang & Yan, Erjia & Hill, Chelsey, 2017. "Disciplinary knowledge diffusion in business research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 655-668.
    11. Giovanni Agostinis, 2019. "Regional Intergovernmental Organizations as Catalysts for Transnational Policy Diffusion: The Case of UNASUR Health," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 1111-1129, September.
    12. Cassi, Lorenzo & Lahatte, Agénor & Rafols, Ismael & Sautier, Pierre & de Turckheim, Élisabeth, 2017. "Improving fitness: Mapping research priorities against societal needs on obesity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 1095-1113.
    13. Youlang Zhang & Xufeng Zhu, 2019. "Multiple mechanisms of policy diffusion in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 495-514, April.
    14. Goderis, Benedikt & Versteeg, Mila, 2014. "The diffusion of constitutional rights," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-19.
    15. Yu, Jinhai & Jennings, Edward T. & Butler, J. S., 2020. "Lobbying, learning and policy reinvention: an examination of the American States’ drunk driving laws," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 259-279, June.
    16. Edwards-Schachter, Mónica & Wallace, Matthew L., 2017. "‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-79.
    17. Cui Huang & Jun Su & Xiang Xie & Jiang Li, 2014. "Basic research is overshadowed by applied research in China: a policy perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 689-694, June.
    18. Zuin, Valentina & Delaire, Caroline & Peletz, Rachel & Cock-Esteb, Alicea & Khush, Ranjiv & Albert, Jeff, 2019. "Policy Diffusion in the Rural Sanitation Sector: Lessons from Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Robin Haunschild & Lutz Bornmann, 2017. "How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1209-1216, March.
    20. Georgalakis, James, 2020. "A disconnected policy network: The UK's response to the Sierra Leone Ebola epidemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    21. Laver, Michael & Benoit, Kenneth & Garry, John, 2003. "Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(2), pages 311-331, May.
    22. Reut Snir & Gilad Ravid, 2016. "Global nanotechnology regulatory governance from a network analysis perspective," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 314-334, December.
    23. Xiao, Yu & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Liu, John S. & Zhou, Zhili, 2014. "Knowledge diffusion path analysis of data quality literature: A main path analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 594-605.
    24. Samantha Vilkins & Will J. Grant, 2017. "Types of evidence cited in Australian Government publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1681-1695, December.
    25. Maggetti, Martino & Gilardi, Fabrizio, 2016. "Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 87-107, March.
    26. Stefan Werland, 2020. "Diffusing Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    27. Sun, Yutao & Cao, Cong, 2018. "The evolving relations between government agencies of innovation policymaking in emerging economies: A policy network approach and its application to the Chinese case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 592-605.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cui Huang & Chao Yang & Jun Su, 2018. "Policy change analysis based on “policy target–policy instrument” patterns: a case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1081-1114, November.
    2. Huang, Cui & Yang, Chao & Su, Jun, 2021. "Identifying core policy instruments based on structural holes: A case study of China’s nuclear energy policy," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    3. Yang, Chao & Huang, Cui, 2022. "Quantitative mapping of the evolution of AI policy distribution, targets and focuses over three decades in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Yang, Chao & Huang, Cui & Su, Jun, 2020. "A bibliometrics-based research framework for exploring policy evolution: A case study of China's information technology policies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Knut Blind & Alex Fenton, 2022. "Standard-relevant publications: evidence, processes and influencing factors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 577-602, January.
    6. Zhihong Huang & Qianjin Zong & Xuerui Ji, 2022. "The associations between scientific collaborations of LIS research and its policy impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6453-6470, November.
    7. Liu, Leilei & Ba, Zhichao & Pei, Lei, 2024. "How does policy information shape its adoption? A citation analysis of large-scale energy policies in China," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4).
    8. Sh Moradi & S Abdi, 2023. "Open science–related policies in Europe," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 521-530.
    9. Hashem Atapour & Robabeh Maddahi & Rasoul Zavaraqi, 2024. "Policy citations of scientometric articles: an altmetric study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4423-4436, July.
    10. repec:osf:socarx:aep9v_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Yashan Li & Jinge Mao & Lin Zhang & Dongbo Wang & Si Shen & Ying Huang, 2022. "How scientific research incorporates policy: an examination using the case of China’s science and technology evaluation system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5283-5306, September.
    12. Wang, Ryan Yang & Jayakar, Krishna, 2024. "Learning from the neighbors: The diffusion of state broadband policies in the United States," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    13. Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin & Adams, Jonathan, 2019. "Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF)," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 325-340.
    14. Wang, Jiaxi & Zhang, Jingjing, 2023. "The impact of policy collaboration networks and policy topic networks on policy diffusion: Empirical evidence from the energy field," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Houqiang Yu & Xueting Cao & Tingting Xiao & Zhenyi Yang, 2020. "How accurate are policy document mentions? A first look at the role of altmetrics database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1517-1540, November.
    16. Houqiang Yu & Biegzat Murat & Jiatong Li & Longfei Li, 2023. "How can policy document mentions to scholarly papers be interpreted? An analysis of the underlying mentioning process," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(11), pages 6247-6266, November.
    17. Dorte Drongstrup & Shafaq Malik & Naif Radi Aljohani & Salem Alelyani & Iqra Safder & Saeed-Ul Hassan, 2020. "Can social media usage of scientific literature predict journal indices of AJG, SNIP and JCR? An altmetric study of economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1541-1558, November.
    18. Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin, 2018. "Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 998-1011.
    19. Dorta-González, Pablo & Rodríguez-Caro, Alejandro & Dorta-González, María Isabel, 2024. "Societal and scientific impact of policy research: A large-scale empirical study of some explanatory factors using Altmetric and Overton," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    20. Simon Hug & Tobias Schulz, 2007. "Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 177-218, June.
    21. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xipeng Liao, 2024. "Analysis of Domain Intersection and Knowledge Evolution—The Development of the Fields of Social Innovation and Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04895-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.