IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v57y2023i6d10.1007_s11135-023-01623-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User behaviors analysis on OTT platform with an integration of technology acceptance model

Author

Listed:
  • Chyoug-Hwa Chen

    (National Development Council)

  • I-Fei Chen

    (Tamkang University)

  • Ruey-Chyn Tsaur

    (Tamkang University)

  • Li-Yun Chui

    (Tamkang University)

Abstract

This research is based on the theory of Technology Acceptance Model to understand consumer behaviors on paid video streaming platforms and explore whether perceived price and user age will moderate user behaviors. Another focus topic is the pricing mechanism of paid video streaming platforms in Taiwan, and we find that most users prefer recurring charges and hybrid plan, which is consistent with the results of the most commonly used paid video streaming platform. The research results prove that when consumers are more satisfied with their personal motivation and system quality, they will increase their satisfaction with perceived ease of use alongside perceived usefulness, thereby improving their overall attitude towards the use of the platform and increasing their willingness to use. In this research, users’ age does not contribute to the difference between attitude toward use and actual use behavior. If one holds a positive attitude towards paid video streaming platforms, regardless of age, it will have a positive intention with continued use behavior in the future. Although users’ age does not significantly moderate to the relationship between attitudes toward user behaviors, it can still be applied as a distinction for judging the intention to use. Finally, based on the research results, practical suggestions are provided to practitioners of OTT platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Chyoug-Hwa Chen & I-Fei Chen & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Li-Yun Chui, 2023. "User behaviors analysis on OTT platform with an integration of technology acceptance model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 5673-5691, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01623-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-023-01623-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-023-01623-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-023-01623-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ebru Tekin Bilbil, 2018. "Methodology for the Regulation of Over-the-top (OTT) Services: The Need of A Multi-dimensional Perspective," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(1), pages 101-110.
    2. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    3. Chong, Alain Yee-Loong, 2013. "Mobile commerce usage activities: The roles of demographic and motivation variables," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(7), pages 1350-1359.
    4. Sheshadri Chatterjee, 2020. "Factors Impacting Behavioral Intention of Users to Adopt IoT In India: From Security and Privacy Perspective," International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP), IGI Global, vol. 14(4), pages 92-112, October.
    5. Richard van der Wurff, 2005. "Business Magazine Market Performance: Magazines for the Agricultural, Business Services, and Transportation Sectors in the Netherlands," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 143-159.
    6. Sara Amoroso & Simonetta Pattuglia & Imran Khan, 2021. "Do Millennials share similar perceptions of brand experience? A clusterization based on brand experience and other brand-related constructs: the case of Netflix," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 33-43, March.
    7. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    8. Shin, Jungwoo & Park, Yuri & Lee, Daeho, 2016. "Strategic management of over-the-top services: Focusing on Korean consumer adoption behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 329-337.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arghya Ray & Muskan Jain & Lan Ma & Khalid Hussain Alhamzi & Ananya Ray & Long She, 2024. "The impact of personality traits, barriers and gamification on Gen X continuance intention for mobile credit bill payment apps," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1154-1174, September.
    2. Peters, Twan & Işık, Öykü & Tona, Olgerta & Popovič, Aleš, 2016. "How system quality influences mobile BI use: The mediating role of engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 773-783.
    3. Hossain Md. Motaher & Zahidul Islam K. M. & Masud Abdullah Al & Biswas Sukanta & Hossain Md. Alamgir, 2021. "Behavioral intention and continued adoption of Facebook: An exploratory study of graduate students in Bangladesh during the Covid-19 pandemic," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 153-186, December.
    4. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    5. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2015. "Exploring the intention to continue using web-based self-service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 85-93.
    6. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    7. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & Juan Sánchez-Fernández & María I. Viedma-del Jesús, 2016. "The moderating effect of user experience on satisfaction with electronic banking: empirical evidence from the Spanish case," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 141-165, February.
    8. Rajiv Sabherwal & Anand Jeyaraj & Charles Chowa, 2006. "Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    9. Kwahk, Kee-Young & Ahn, Hyunchul & Ryu, Young U., 2018. "Understanding mandatory IS use behavior: How outcome expectations affect conative IS use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-76.
    10. Jullie Jeanette Sondakh, 2017. "Behavioral Intention to Use E-Tax Service System: An Application of Technology Acceptance Model," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2A), pages 48-64.
    11. Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel & Geyer-Schulz, Andreas & Schreiber, Stefanie, 2017. "How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 306-319.
    12. Kalinic, Zoran & Marinkovic, Veljko & Molinillo, Sebastián & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco, 2019. "A multi-analytical approach to peer-to-peer mobile payment acceptance prediction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 143-153.
    13. Jeeyeon Jeong & Yaeri Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2021. "Do Consumers Care About Aesthetics and Compatibility? The Intention to Use Wearable Devices in Health Care," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    14. Yang, Byunghwa & Kim, Youngchan & Yoo, Changjo, 2013. "The integrated mobile advertising model: The effects of technology- and emotion-based evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1345-1352.
    15. Maksym Koghut & Omar AI-Tabbaa, 2021. "Exploring Consumers’ Discontinuance Intention of Remote Mobile Payments during Post-Adoption Usage: An Empirical Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-33, February.
    16. Yang-Chieh Chin, 2016. "Consumer Acceptance of Online Complaint Forms: An Integration of TPB, TAM and Values Perspective," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 265-279, December.
    17. Kuttimani Tamilmani & Nripendra P. Rana & Robin Nunkoo & Vishnupriya Raghavan & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2022. "Indian Travellers’ Adoption of Airbnb Platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 77-96, February.
    18. Türker, Cansu & Altay, Burak Can & Okumuş, Abdullah, 2022. "Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Mital, Monika & Chang, Victor & Choudhary, Praveen & Papa, Armando & Pani, Ashis K., 2018. "Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 339-346.
    20. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong & Lewis C. Chasalow & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2014. "A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 111-136, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:57:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11135-023-01623-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.