IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i3p977-987.html

Detecting latent components in ordinal data with overdispersion by means of a mixture distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Iannario

Abstract

The paper describes a mixture distribution generated by Beta Binomial and Uniform random variables to allow for a possible overdispersion in surveys when the response of interest is an ordinal variable. This approach considers the joint presence of feeling, uncertainty and a possible dispersion sometimes present in the evaluation contexts. After a discussion of the main properties of this class of models, asymptotic likelihood methods have been applied for efficient statistical inference. The implementation on the survey on household income and wealth (SHIW) will confirm the versatility of this distribution and the usefulness to distinguish the determinants of uncertainty and overdispersion in real data. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Iannario, 2015. "Detecting latent components in ordinal data with overdispersion by means of a mixture distribution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 977-987, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:3:p:977-987
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0113-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-0113-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-0113-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Riccardo Sartori & Andrea Ceschi, 2011. "Uncertainty and its perception: experimental study of the numeric expression of uncertainty in two decisional contexts," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 187-198, January.
    2. Rossi P. E & Gilula Z. & Allenby G. M, 2001. "Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 20-31, March.
    3. Ram Tripathi & Ramesh Gupta & John Gurland, 1994. "Estimation of parameters in the beta binomial model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 46(2), pages 317-331, June.
    4. Hinde, John & Demetrio, Clarice G. B., 1998. "Overdispersion: Models and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 151-170, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Iannario & Marica Manisera & Domenico Piccolo & Paola Zuccolotto, 2020. "Ordinal Data Models for No-Opinion Responses in Attitude Survey," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 250-276, February.
    2. Stefania Capecchi & Maria Iannario & Rosaria Simone, 2018. "Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 729-750, January.
    3. Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "A comprehensive framework of regression models for ordinal data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(2), pages 233-252, August.
    4. Anna Gottard & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "Varying uncertainty in CUB models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 225-244, June.
    5. Marcella Corduas & Alfonso Piscitelli, 2017. "Modeling university student satisfaction: the case of the humanities and social studies degree programs," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 617-628, March.
    6. Evgeniy M. Ozhegov & Daria Teterina, 2018. "The Ensemble Method For Censored Demand Prediction," HSE Working papers WP BRP 200/EC/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tony Vangeneugden & Geert Molenberghs & Geert Verbeke & Clarice G.B. Dem�trio, 2011. "Marginal correlation from an extended random-effects model for repeated and overdispersed counts," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 215-232, September.
    2. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    3. William H. Greene & Mark N. Harris & Rachel J. Knott & Nigel Rice, 2021. "Specification and testing of hierarchical ordered response models with anchoring vignettes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 31-64, January.
    4. Ali Jafari, 2012. "Inferences on the ratio of two generalized variances: independent and correlated cases," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(3), pages 297-314, August.
    5. Gubanova, Tatiana & Volinskiy, Dmitriy & Adamowicz, Wiktor L. & Veeman, Michele M., 2008. "Delving into Choice Internals: A Joint Discrete Choice/Attribute Rating Model," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6252, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Jeonghwan Kim & Woojoo Lee, 2019. "On testing the hidden heterogeneity in negative binomial regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 457-470, May.
    7. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2008. "Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments," Working Papers 08-26, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    8. Errington Adam & Einbeck Jochen & Cumming Jonathan & Rössler Ute & Endesfelder David, 2022. "The effect of data aggregation on dispersion estimates in count data models," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 183-202, May.
    9. Wang, Luming & Finn, Adam, 2014. "A psychometric theory that measures up to marketing reality: An adapted Many Faceted IRT model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 93-102.
    10. repec:jss:jstsof:03:i01 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Mabel Morales-Otero & Vicente Núñez-Antón, 2021. "Comparing Bayesian Spatial Conditional Overdispersion and the Besag–York–Mollié Models: Application to Infant Mortality Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-33, January.
    12. Joachim Büschken & Thomas Otter & Greg M. Allenby, 2013. "The Dimensionality of Customer Satisfaction Survey Responses and Implications for Driver Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 533-553, July.
    13. Tuck Siong Chung & Roland T. Rust & Michel Wedel, 2009. "My Mobile Music: An Adaptive Personalization System for Digital Audio Players," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 52-68, 01-02.
    14. Sha Yang & Yi Zhao & Ravi Dhar, 2010. "Modeling the Underreporting Bias in Panel Survey Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 525-539, 05-06.
    15. Riccardo Sartori & Andrea Ceschi, 2013. "Assessment and development centers: judgment biases and risks of using idiographic and nomothetic approaches to collecting information on people to be evaluated and trained in organizations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3277-3288, October.
    16. Stan Lipovetsky & Michael Conklin, 2018. "Decreasing Respondent Heterogeneity by Likert Scales Adjustment via Multipoles," Stats, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, November.
    17. Aubry, Philippe & Francesiaz, Charlotte & Guillemain, Matthieu, 2024. "On the impact of preferential sampling on ecological status and trend assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    18. Molenberghs, Geert & Verbeke, Geert & Iddi, Samuel & Demétrio, Clarice G.B., 2012. "A combined beta and normal random-effects model for repeated, overdispersed binary and binomial data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 94-109.
    19. Barbara Kachigunda & Kerrie Mengersen & Devindri I Perera & Grey T Coupland & Johann van der Merwe & Simon McKirdy, 2022. "Use of mixed-type data clustering algorithm for characterizing temporal and spatial distribution of biosecurity border detections of terrestrial non-indigenous species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Romina Gambacorta & Maria Iannario, 2013. "Measuring Job Satisfaction with CUB Models," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 27(2), pages 198-224, June.
    21. Lee, Dae-Jin & Durbán, María, 2008. "Smooth-car mixed models for spatial count data," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws085820, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:3:p:977-987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.