IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v12y2020i3d10.1007_s12469-020-00250-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A spatially disaggregated model for the technology selection and design of a transit line

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Moccia

    (Istituto di Calcolo e Reti ad Alte Prestazioni
    Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT))

  • Duncan W. Allen

    (IBI Group)

  • Gilbert Laporte

    (Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT)
    3000 chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine
    University of Bath)

Abstract

Our research question is the usefulness of a high level of spatial granularity for the travel demand when planning a transit line. We formulate a new optimization model for the technology selection and design of a transit line where the spatial attributes of the travel demand can be finely set. The solution method relies on approximated formulae, and we establish relationships with a classic result for the optimal stop spacing. We also present a refinement of the in-vehicle passenger crowding for an existing transit design model where demand spatial attributes are set synthetically. We call “spatially disaggregate” and “spatially aggregate” the former and the latter model, respectively. These two models are compared by numerical experiments on a scenario for three semi-rapid transit technologies where two variants consider opposite demand profiles in terms of spatial distribution. We conclude that the spatially aggregated model is sufficient when the main goal is technology selection, whereas the spatially disaggregate model is better for design and benchmarking purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Moccia & Duncan W. Allen & Gilbert Laporte, 2020. "A spatially disaggregated model for the technology selection and design of a transit line," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 647-691, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:12:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-020-00250-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-020-00250-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-020-00250-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-020-00250-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tirachini, Alejandro & Hensher, David A. & Jara-Díaz, Sergio R., 2010. "Restating modal investment priority with an improved model for public transport analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1148-1168, November.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2012. "On the design of public infrastructure systems with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1288-1293.
    3. Moccia, Luigi & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "Improved models for technology choice in a transit corridor with fixed demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 245-270.
    4. Gilbert Laporte & Juan Mesa & Francisco Ortega, 1997. "Assessing the efficiency of rapid transit configurations," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 5(1), pages 95-104, June.
    5. G. F. Newell, 1979. "Some Issues Relating to the Optimal Design of Bus Routes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 20-35, February.
    6. S. C. Wirasinghe & Nadia S. Ghoneim, 1981. "Spacing of Bus-Stops for Many to Many Travel Demand," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 210-221, August.
    7. Sergio Jara-Díaz & Antonio Gschwender, 2003. "Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 453-469, July.
    8. Moccia, Luigi & Giallombardo, Giovanni & Laporte, Gilbert, 2017. "Models for technology choice in a transit corridor with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 733-756.
    9. Vukan R. Vuchic & Gordon F. Newell, 1968. "Rapid Transit Interstation Spacings for Minimum Travel Time," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(4), pages 303-339, November.
    10. Luigi Moccia & Duncan W. Allen & Eric C. Bruun, 2018. "A technology selection and design model of a semi-rapid transit line," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 455-497, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luigi Moccia & Duncan W. Allen & Gilbert Laporte & Andrea Spinosa, 2022. "Mode boundaries of automated metro and semi-rapid rail in urban transit," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 739-802, October.
    2. Gülçin Canbulut & Erkan Köse & Oğuzhan Ahmet Arik, 2022. "Public transportation vehicle selection by the grey relational analysis method," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 367-384, June.
    3. Basnak, Paul & Giesen, Ricardo & Muñoz, Juan Carlos, 2022. "Estimation of crowding factors for public transport during the COVID-19 pandemic in Santiago, Chile," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 140-156.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Moccia & Duncan W. Allen & Gilbert Laporte & Andrea Spinosa, 2022. "Mode boundaries of automated metro and semi-rapid rail in urban transit," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 739-802, October.
    2. Luigi Moccia & Duncan W. Allen & Eric C. Bruun, 2018. "A technology selection and design model of a semi-rapid transit line," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 455-497, December.
    3. Moccia, Luigi & Laporte, Gilbert, 2016. "Improved models for technology choice in a transit corridor with fixed demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 245-270.
    4. Tirachini, Alejandro, 2014. "The economics and engineering of bus stops: Spacing, design and congestion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 37-57.
    5. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    6. Moccia, Luigi & Giallombardo, Giovanni & Laporte, Gilbert, 2017. "Models for technology choice in a transit corridor with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 733-756.
    7. Chen, Peng (Will) & Nie, Yu (Marco), 2018. "Optimal design of demand adaptive paired-line hybrid transit: Case of radial route structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 71-89.
    8. Fan, Wenbo & Mei, Yu & Gu, Weihua, 2018. "Optimal design of intersecting bimodal transit networks in a grid city," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 203-226.
    9. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2010. "Structure of competitive transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 434-446, May.
    10. Hugo Badia, 2020. "Comparison of Bus Network Structures in Face of Urban Dispersion for a Ring-Radial City," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 233-271, March.
    11. Zhang, Junlin & Lindsey, Robin & Yang, Hai, 2018. "Public transit service frequency and fares with heterogeneous users under monopoly and alternative regulatory policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 190-208.
    12. Proboste, Francisco & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Gschwender, Antonio, 2020. "Comparing social costs of public transport networks structured around an Open and Closed BRT corridor in medium sized cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 187-212.
    13. Langevin, André & Mbaraga, Pontien & Campbell, James F., 1996. "Continuous approximation models in freight distribution: An overview," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 163-188, June.
    14. Luca Quadrifoglio & Randolph W. Hall & Maged M. Dessouky, 2006. "Performance and Design of Mobility Allowance Shuttle Transit Services: Bounds on the Maximum Longitudinal Velocity," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 351-363, August.
    15. Samanta, Sutapa & Jha, Manoj K., 2011. "Modeling a rail transit alignment considering different objectives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 31-45, January.
    16. Militão, Aitan M. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "Optimal fleet size for a shared demand-responsive transport system with human-driven vs automated vehicles: A total cost minimization approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 52-80.
    17. Gang Cheng & Shuzhi Zhao & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Bi-Level Programming Model for Optimal Bus Stop Spacing of a Bus Rapid Transit System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Chen, Haoyu & Gu, Weihua & Cassidy, Michael J. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2015. "Optimal transit service atop ring-radial and grid street networks: A continuum approximation design method and comparisons," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 755-774.
    19. Fielbaum, Andrés & Tirachini, Alejandro & Alonso-Mora, Javier, 2023. "Economies and diseconomies of scale in on-demand ridepooling systems," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    20. Ouyang, Yanfeng & Nourbakhsh, Seyed Mohammad & Cassidy, Michael J., 2014. "Continuum approximation approach to bus network design under spatially heterogeneous demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 333-344.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:12:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-020-00250-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.