IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pharme/v39y2021i6d10.1007_s40273-021-01036-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Putting Stakeholder Engagement at the Center of Health Economic Modeling for Health Technology Assessment in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Z. Xie

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

  • Erica deFur Malik

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

  • Mark T. Linthicum

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

  • Jennifer L. Bright

    (Innovation and Value Initiative)

Abstract

While evidence generated from health economic (HE) models is being used more commonly in health technology assessment (HTA) in the US, it is not consistently adopted by different stakeholder groups or across therapeutic areas. We hypothesize that actively engaging with multiple stakeholder groups throughout the model development process may result in models more widely considered by decision makers. To test this hypothesis, the Innovation and Value Initiative has launched a modeling effort to build an open-source HE model focusing on the disease state ‘major depressive disorder’. A 20-member advisory group has been formed with representatives from patients, employers, clinicians, innovators, payers, and researchers to guide the model development process. While this effort is still in the early stages, the ongoing stakeholder engagement effort has yielded valuable insights that inform the model design. We have also identified several challenges to implementing this new approach. Our early findings suggest that the stakeholder engagement approach to HE model development has the potential to improve HTA in the US.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Z. Xie & Erica deFur Malik & Mark T. Linthicum & Jennifer L. Bright, 2021. "Putting Stakeholder Engagement at the Center of Health Economic Modeling for Health Technology Assessment in the United States," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 631-638, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01036-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01036-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40273-021-01036-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40273-021-01036-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul E. Greenberg & Andree-Anne Fournier & Tammy Sisitsky & Mark Simes & Richard Berman & Sarah H. Koenigsberg & Ronald C. Kessler, 2021. "The Economic Burden of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018)," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 653-665, June.
    2. Alice Chen & Dana Goldman, 2016. "Health Care Spending: Historical Trends and New Directions," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 291-319, October.
    3. Vakaramoko Diaby & Askal A. Ali & Alberto J. Montero, 2019. "Value Assessment Frameworks in the United States: A Call for Patient Engagement," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-3, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Proudman & Paul Greenberg & Dave Nellesen, 2021. "The Growing Burden of Major Depressive Disorders (MDD): Implications for Researchers and Policy Makers," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 619-625, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borbely, Daniel & Lenhart, Otto & Norris, Jonathan & Romiti, Agnese, 2022. "Marijuana Legalization and Mental Health," IZA Discussion Papers 15729, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Courtemanche, Charles & Jones, Jordan & Koumpias, Antonios M. & Zapata, Daniela, 2022. "Revisiting the Connection between State Medicaid Expansions and Adult Mortality," IZA Discussion Papers 15803, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Eunhae Shin, 2019. "Hospital responses to price shocks under the prospective payment system," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 245-260, February.
    4. Ringdal, Charlotte & Rootjes, Frank, 2022. "Depression and labor supply: Evidence from the Netherlands," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    5. David Proudman & Paul Greenberg & Dave Nellesen, 2021. "The Growing Burden of Major Depressive Disorders (MDD): Implications for Researchers and Policy Makers," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 619-625, June.
    6. Joelle H Fong, 2019. "Out-of-pocket health spending among Medicare beneficiaries: Which chronic diseases are most costly?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Mark Attridge & Steven P. Dickens, 2022. "Health and Work Outcomes of Brief Counseling From an EAP in Vermont: Follow-Up Survey Results, Client Satisfaction, and Estimated Cost Savings," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    8. Nicole Gusset, 2022. "Importance of Patient Involvement in the Value Assessment Process: On the Way Towards Personalised Treatments," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 7-10, April.
    9. Maryaline Catillon & David Cutler & Thomas Getzen, 2018. "Two Hundred Years of Health and Medical Care: The Importance of Medical Care for Life Expectancy Gains," NBER Working Papers 25330, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Mark Elder & Magnus Bengtsson & Lewis Akenji, 2016. "An Optimistic Analysis of the Means of Implementation for Sustainable Development Goals: Thinking about Goals as Means," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Juyeon Oh & Seunghyun Lee & Juho Sim & Seunghan Kim & Ara Cho & Byungyoon Yun & Jin-Ha Yoon, 2021. "Association between Self-Perceived Social Support in the Workplace and the Presence of Depressive/Anxiety Symptoms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Hossein Zare & Nicholas S. Meyerson & Chineze Adania Nwankwo & Roland J. Thorpe, 2022. "How Income and Income Inequality Drive Depressive Symptoms in U.S. Adults, Does Sex Matter: 2005–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pharme:v:39:y:2021:i:6:d:10.1007_s40273-021-01036-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.