IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v55y2018i2d10.1007_s12597-017-0327-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishing predictive relationships between price and select product, market, and consumer related dimensions: an investigation within indian consumer electronics market

Author

Listed:
  • Mohit Goswami

    (Operations Management Group, Indian Institute of Management Raipur)

Abstract

This research intends to empirically examine within the ambit of Indian consumer electronics market the relationship between product prices and select product, market, and consumer related facets. Product distinctiveness (function of product commonality), consumer choice probabilities and numeral ratings of consumer reviews associated with product offerings within a market segment are considered the representative elements of product, market and consumer related dimensions respectively in this research. Initially, employing the one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) technique, the test for statistical equality of product offering’s (of key market players) prices within a market segment is carried out. Thereafter, employing the multi linear regression (MLR) technique, the empirical relationships between product pricing and product distinctiveness, consumer choice, and consumer ratings are established. The devised research framework is demonstrated for the smartphone product offerings listed at the website of India’s leading e-retailer (Flipkart) in the price band of Rs. 5000–10,000. Our analysis reveals several key managerial insights. An important insight that results from our study pertains to the fact that consumer ratings provided by end users in this market segment does not seem to influence the product pricing considerably. Another noteworthy insight refers to the fact that subject to certain threshold price within this segment, the consumers really does not discriminate in purchasing product offering(s) of one manufacturer from the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohit Goswami, 2018. "Establishing predictive relationships between price and select product, market, and consumer related dimensions: an investigation within indian consumer electronics market," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(2), pages 361-380, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:55:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-017-0327-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-017-0327-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-017-0327-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-017-0327-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gautam Gowrisankaran & Marc Rysman, 2012. "Dynamics of Consumer Demand for New Durable Goods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 120(6), pages 1173-1219.
    2. Mohit Goswami & M. K. Tiwari, 2015. "Product feature and functionality driven integrated framework for product commercialization in presence of qualitative consumer reviews," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 4769-4788, August.
    3. Xuemei Zhang & Yao Wei & Jiqiong Liu & Gang Chen, 2015. "Product Design Strategy with Commonality by Considering Customer-Choice Behavior in Supply Chain," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(05), pages 1-22.
    4. Nikolay Archak & Anindya Ghose & Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis, 2011. "Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1485-1509, August.
    5. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, March.
    6. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Dekker, Thijs, 2014. "Random regret minimization for consumer choice modeling: Assessment of empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2428-2436.
    7. Kostyra, Daniel S. & Reiner, Jochen & Natter, Martin & Klapper, Daniel, 2016. "Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 11-26.
    8. Kajal Chatterjee & Samarjit Kar, 2016. "Multi-criteria analysis of supply chain risk management using interval valued fuzzy TOPSIS," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 474-499, September.
    9. Suzanne Fogel & Dan Lovallo & Carmina Caringal, 2004. "Loss Aversion for Quality in Consumer Choice," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(1), pages 45-63, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Gensler, Sonja & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2016. "To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 253-267.
    2. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    3. Dominik Gutt, 2018. "In the Eye of the Beholder? Empirically Decomposing Different Economic Implications of the Online Rating Variance," Working Papers Dissertations 40, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    4. Cui Zhao & Xiaojun Wang & Yongbo Xiao & Jie Sheng, 2022. "Effects of online reviews and competition on quality and pricing strategies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3840-3858, October.
    5. Cui Zhao & Xiaoshuai Peng & Zhendong Li, 2023. "The influence of online customer reviews on two-stage product strategy in a competitive market," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 411-503, July.
    6. Sun, Miao & Chen, Jing & Tian, Ye & Yan, Yufei, 2021. "The impact of online reviews in the presence of customer returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Joe Cox & Daniel Kaimann, 2013. "The Signaling Effect of Critics - Evidence from a Market for Experience Goods," Working Papers CIE 68, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    8. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Yabing Jiang & Hong Guo, 2012. "Design of Consumer Review Systems and Product Pricing," Working Papers 12-10, NET Institute.
    10. Schneider, Matthew J. & Gupta, Sachin, 2016. "Forecasting sales of new and existing products using consumer reviews: A random projections approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 243-256.
    11. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    12. Guha Majumder, Madhumita & Dutta Gupta, Sangita & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Perceived usefulness of online customer reviews: A review mining approach using machine learning & exploratory data analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 147-164.
    13. Bin Guo & Shasha Zhou, 2017. "What makes population perception of review helpfulness: an information processing perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 585-608, December.
    14. Zunqiang Zhang & Guoqing Chen & Jin Zhang & Xunhua Guo & Qiang Wei, 2016. "Providing Consistent Opinions from Online Reviews: A Heuristic Stepwise Optimization Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 236-250, May.
    15. Young Kwark & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2014. "Online Product Reviews: Implications for Retailers and Competing Manufacturers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 93-110, March.
    16. Akshay Kangale & S. Krishna Kumar & Mohd Arshad Naeem & Mark Williams & M. K. Tiwari, 2016. "Mining consumer reviews to generate ratings of different product attributes while producing feature-based review-summary," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(13), pages 3272-3286, October.
    17. Floyd, Kristopher & Freling, Ryan & Alhoqail, Saad & Cho, Hyun Young & Freling, Traci, 2014. "How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 217-232.
    18. Young Kwark & Gene Moo Lee & Paul A. Pavlou & Liangfei Qiu, 2021. "On the Spillover Effects of Online Product Reviews on Purchases: Evidence from Clickstream Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 895-913, September.
    19. Katsifaraki, Georgia D. & Theodosiou, Marios, 2020. "How different (dis)engagement behaviors affect performance within an e-market ecosystem: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 578-591.
    20. Hernández-Ortega, Blanca, 2020. "When the performance comes into play: The influence of positive online consumer reviews on individuals' post-consumption responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 422-435.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:55:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-017-0327-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.