IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i6d10.1007_s11069-024-06998-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fragility and damage functions for production forests exposed to volcanic ashfall and flood hazards in Aotearoa-New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • L. Dowling

    (Market Economics Ltd)

  • H. M. Craig

    (University of Canterbury
    National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA))

  • N. McDonald

    (Market Economics Ltd)

Abstract

This study focuses on the economic impacts of disaster-related events, specifically the impacts of floods and volcanic eruptions on production forestry in Aotearoa-New Zealand (A-NZ). A-NZ has extensive areas of production forests exposed to flood risks and active volcanoes. This exposure, coupled with the potential magnitude of impacts, and the prolonged period in which those impacts materialise, make A-NZ’s production forests an important case study for understanding the economic impacts of flood and volcanic forest damage. This research develops functions to predict economic outcomes from hazard impacts through a literature review, expert elicitation, and the modelling of revenue impacts. Predictions for flooding were based on water depth and flood duration, while ashfall thickness was considered for volcanic events. For flood events, functions predict forest-crop survival rates and the flow-on impact to forest management costs and log revenues were modelled. For volcanic events, functions predict the probability of impact states, defined by forest management cost and revenue scenarios. Impacted cashflows for three distinct forest age classes were assessed in an industry-established forest valuation framework, providing a structured impact assessment over a 29-year cycle of tree growth and harvest. Net impacts of flooding and volcanic events varied by forest age class and hazard metrics and were up to NZ$50,000/ha for older-age class forests under 3 m of water depth for three months, or 3 m of ashfall. This forest-age-class based impact assessment covered the range of hazard metrics up to and including unusually severe flood and volcanic events, presenting the full range of potential economic impacts and providing a vulnerability variable for simulating future risk.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Dowling & H. M. Craig & N. McDonald, 2025. "Fragility and damage functions for production forests exposed to volcanic ashfall and flood hazards in Aotearoa-New Zealand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(6), pages 7027-7049, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06998-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06998-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06998-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06998-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather Craig & Thomas Wilson & Carol Stewart & Gustavo Villarosa & Valeria Outes & Shane Cronin & Susanna Jenkins, 2016. "Agricultural impact assessment and management after three widespread tephra falls in Patagonia, South America," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 1167-1229, June.
    2. Mattia Amadio & Jaroslav Mysiak & Lorenzo Carrera & Elco Koks, 2016. "Improving flood damage assessment models in Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(3), pages 2075-2088, July.
    3. Boscolo, Marco & Vincent, Jeffrey R., 2003. "Nonconvexities in the production of timber, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 251-268, September.
    4. Thomas Wilson & Jim Cole & Shane Cronin & Carol Stewart & David Johnston, 2011. "Impacts on agriculture following the 1991 eruption of Vulcan Hudson, Patagonia: lessons for recovery," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 57(2), pages 185-212, May.
    5. Francesca Casalini & Morvarid Bagherzadeh & Emily Gray, 2021. "Building the resilience of New Zealand’s agricultural sector to floods," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 160, OECD Publishing.
    6. Mary Anne Thompson & Jan M. Lindsay & Thomas M. Wilson & Sebastien Biass & Laura Sandri, 2017. "Quantifying risk to agriculture from volcanic ashfall: a case study from the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 31-56, March.
    7. Amadio, Mattia & Mysiak, Jaroslav & Carrera, Lorenzo & Koks, Elco, 2016. "Improving Flood Damage Assessment Models in Italy," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 230600, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    8. Ben S. Hague & Andy J. Taylor, 2021. "Tide-only inundation: a metric to quantify the contribution of tides to coastal inundation under sea-level rise," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 675-695, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fajar Yulianto & Muhammad Rokhis Khomarudin & Eddy Hermawan & Syarif Budhiman & Parwati Sofan & Galdita Aruba Chulafak & Nunung Puji Nugroho & Randy Prima Brahmantara & Gatot Nugroho & Suwarsono Suwar, 2023. "The development of the Raster-based Probability Flood Inundation Model (RProFIM) approach for flood modelling in the upstream Citarum Watershed, West Java, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1887-1922, June.
    2. Md Shahinoor Rahman & Liping Di, 2020. "A Systematic Review on Case Studies of Remote-Sensing-Based Flood Crop Loss Assessment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-30, April.
    3. Juan Camilo Gomez-Zapata & Cristhian Parrado & Theresa Frimberger & Fernando Barragán-Ochoa & Fabio Brill & Kerstin Büche & Michael Krautblatter & Michael Langbein & Massimiliano Pittore & Hugo Rosero, 2021. "Community Perception and Communication of Volcanic Risk from the Cotopaxi Volcano in Latacunga, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Borowska-Stefańska, Marta & Kobojek, Sławomir & Kowalski, Michał & Lewicki, Marek & Tomalski, Przemysław & Wiśniewski, Szymon, 2021. "Changes in the spatial development of flood hazard areas in Poland between 1990 and 2018 in the light of legal conditions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. María Bermúdez & Andreas Paul Zischg, 2018. "Sensitivity of flood loss estimates to building representation and flow depth attribution methods in micro-scale flood modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1633-1648, July.
    6. Jidong Wu & Mengqi Ye & Xu Wang & Elco Koks, 2019. "Building Asset Value Mapping in Support of Flood Risk Assessments: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Jens Abildtrup & Jacques-Alexandre Laye & Maximilien Laye & Anne Stenger, 2012. "Irreversibility and Uncertainty in Multifunctional Forest Management Allocation," Post-Print hal-01072290, HAL.
    8. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Sohngen, Brent, 2007. "Economics of Forest Ecosystem Carbon Sinks: A Review," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 237-269, September.
    9. Johanna Choumert-Nkolo & Pascale Phélinas, 2020. "Natural disasters, land and labour [Adapting to changes in volcanic behaviour: Formal and informal interactions for enhanced risk management at Tungurahua Volcano, Ecuador]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 296-323.
    10. Victor Stephane, 2016. "How Do Natural Disasters Affect Saving Behavior?," Working Papers halshs-01409651, HAL.
    11. Cainelli, Giulio & Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Zoboli, Roberto, 2008. "The Relationship Between Environmental Efficiency and Manufacturing Firm’s Growth," Coalition Theory Network Working Papers 46656, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    12. Indrajaya, Yonky & van der Werf, Edwin & Weikard, Hans-Peter & Mohren, Frits & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2016. "The potential of REDD+ for carbon sequestration in tropical forests: Supply curves for carbon storage for Kalimantan, Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Massimiliano Mazzanti & Roberto Zoboli, 2007. "Environmental Efficiency, Emission Trends and Labour Productivity: Trade-Off or Joint Dynamics? Empirical Evidence Using NAMEA Panel Data," Working Papers 2007.40, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    14. Johanna Choumert & Pascale Phelinas, 2018. "Volcanic hazards, land and labor," CERDI Working papers halshs-01845041, HAL.
    15. Nabhani, Abbas & Mardaneh, Elham & Sjølie, Hanne K., 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of forest ecosystem services under uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 494(C).
    16. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2022. "Nonconvexity in Production and Cost Functions: An Exploratory and Selective Review," Springer Books, in: Subhash C. Ray & Robert G. Chambers & Subal C. Kumbhakar (ed.), Handbook of Production Economics, chapter 18, pages 721-754, Springer.
    17. Alana M. Weir & Thomas M. Wilson & Mark S. Bebbington & Sarah Beaven & Teresa Gordon & Craig Campbell-Smart & Stuart Mead & James H. Williams & Roger Fairclough, 2024. "Approaching the challenge of multi-phase, multi-hazard volcanic impact assessment through the lens of systemic risk: application to Taranaki Mounga," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(10), pages 9327-9360, August.
    18. Tran, Ngoc Bich & Ley, Eduardo, 2012. "Green prices," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6131, The World Bank.
    19. Tisdell, Clement A., 2012. "Conserving Forest Wildlife and Other Ecosystem Services: Opportunity Costs and The Valuation of Alternative Logging Regimes," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 126230, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    20. Ian Bateman & Georgina Mace & Carlo Fezzi & Giles Atkinson & Kerry Turner, 2011. "Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 177-218, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06998-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.