Author
Listed:
- Noor Suraya Romali
(Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al- Sultan Abdullah)
- Sumiliana Sulong
(Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al- Sultan Abdullah)
- Akiyuki Kawasaki
(The University of Tokyo)
Abstract
Literature gaps on the methodologies employed in developing countries facing data scarcity remain unresolved despite the growing literature on flood damage assessment. As such, this study aims to review flood damage assessment methods, with a specific emphasis on their application in data-scarce regions. The novelty of this paper lies in identifying the encountered challenges and providing recommendations for future research on methods tailored to address these issues. A total of 129 peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 to March 2024 were systematically assessed. Approximately 67% of the studies were conducted in developed countries, with the remaining 33% performed in developing countries. Given that 80% of the articles were published from 2010, developing countries highlight an exponential rise in research contributions. Unit loss methods, damage curve, and multivariate models were found to be the most frequently-used assessment methods. The study identified a critical gap in existing flood damage estimation methods, specifically their limited applicability in data-scarce regions due to insufficient data. Developing countries could benefit from applying the multivariate model, which facilitates synthetic data generation by establishing relationships between flood damage and variables pertaining to flood resistance and impact. This approach allows for more robust flood damage assessments in developing countries, which is key to bridging the existing gap in data-scarce regions.
Suggested Citation
Noor Suraya Romali & Sumiliana Sulong & Akiyuki Kawasaki, 2025.
"A Systematic Review of Flood Damage Assessment: Insight for the Data-Scarce Regions,"
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(10), pages 4707-4734, August.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04265-9
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-025-04265-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04265-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.