IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13817-d952194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flood Damage Assessment: A Review of Microscale Methodologies for Residential Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Oluwatofunmi Deborah Aribisala

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work. Both are considered as the co-first authors.)

  • Sang-Guk Yum

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work. Both are considered as the co-first authors.)

  • Manik Das Adhikari

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea)

  • Moon-Soo Song

    (Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

Abstract

Flood damage assessment (FDA) is an essential tool for evaluating flood damage, vulnerability, and risk to civil systems such as residential buildings. The outcome of an FDA depends on the spatial limits of the study and the complexity of the data. For microscale FDA, a high level of detail is required to assess flood damage. This study reviewed the existing methodologies in microscale FDA based on empirical and synthetic data selection methods for model development. The merits and challenges of these approaches are discussed. This review also proposes an integrated step for assessing the stages of FDA. This study contributes to the literature by providing insights into the methodologies adopted, particularly on a microscale basis, which has not been comprehensively discussed in the previous reviews. The findings of this study reveal that univariate modeling of flood damage is nevertheless popular among researchers. New advanced approaches, such as advanced machine learning and 3D models, are yet to gain prominence when compared with the univariate modeling that has recorded a high success. This review concludes that there is a need to adopt a combined empirical–synthetic approach in the selection of data for developing damage models. Further research is required in the areas of multivariate modeling (advanced machine learning), 3D BIM-GIS modeling, 3D visualization of damages, and projection of probabilities in flood damage predictions to buildings. These are essential for performance flood-based building designs and for promoting building resilience to flood damage.

Suggested Citation

  • Oluwatofunmi Deborah Aribisala & Sang-Guk Yum & Manik Das Adhikari & Moon-Soo Song, 2022. "Flood Damage Assessment: A Review of Microscale Methodologies for Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13817-:d:952194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nofal, Omar M. & van de Lindt, John W. & Do, Trung Q., 2020. "Multi-variate and single-variable flood fragility and loss approaches for buildings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Atthanan Lekuthai & Suphat Vongvisessomjai, 2001. "Intangible Flood Damage Quantification," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 15(5), pages 343-362, October.
    3. Md. Nawrose Fatemi & Seth Asare Okyere & Stephen Kofi Diko & Michihiro Kita & Motoki Shimoda & Shigeki Matsubara, 2020. "Physical Vulnerability and Local Responses to Flood Damage in Peri-Urban Areas of Dhaka, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. H. Apel & G. Aronica & H. Kreibich & A. Thieken, 2009. "Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 49(1), pages 79-98, April.
    5. Heidi Kreibich & Anna Botto & Bruno Merz & Kai Schröter, 2017. "Probabilistic, Multivariable Flood Loss Modeling on the Mesoscale with BT‐FLEMO," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 774-787, April.
    6. Mercio Cerbaro & Stephen Morse & Richard Murphy & Sarah Middlemiss & Dimitrios Michelakis, 2022. "Assessing Urban Vulnerability to Flooding: A Framework to Measure Resilience Using Remote Sensing Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Sunmin Lee & Saro Lee & Moung-Jin Lee & Hyung-Sup Jung, 2018. "Spatial Assessment of Urban Flood Susceptibility Using Data Mining and Geographic Information System (GIS) Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, February.
    8. R. De Risi & F. Jalayer & F. De Paola & I. Iervolino & M. Giugni & M. Topa & E. Mbuya & A. Kyessi & G. Manfredi & P. Gasparini, 2013. "Flood risk assessment for informal settlements," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 1003-1032, October.
    9. Morteza T. Marvi, 2020. "A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 967-995, July.
    10. Gianna Ida Festa & Luigi Guerriero & Mariano Focareta & Giuseppe Meoli & Silvana Revellino & Francesco Maria Guadagno & Paola Revellino, 2022. "Calculating Economic Flood Damage through Microscale Risk Maps and Data Generalization: A Pilot Study in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Balqis M. Rehan, 2018. "An innovative micro-scale approach for vulnerability and flood risk assessment with the application to property-level protection adoptions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1039-1057, April.
    12. Ji-Myong Kim & Taehui Kim & Kiyoung Son & Sang-Guk Yum & Sungjin Ahn, 2019. "Measuring Vulnerability of Typhoon in Residential Facilities: Focusing on Typhoon Maemi in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    13. Jonkman, S.N. & Bockarjova, M. & Kok, M. & Bernardini, P., 2008. "Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 77-90, May.
    14. B. Tellman & J. A. Sullivan & C. Kuhn & A. J. Kettner & C. S. Doyle & G. R. Brakenridge & T. A. Erickson & D. A. Slayback, 2021. "Satellite imaging reveals increased proportion of population exposed to floods," Nature, Nature, vol. 596(7870), pages 80-86, August.
    15. Ji-Myong Kim & Taehui Kim & Sungjin Ahn, 2020. "Loss Assessment for Sustainable Industrial Infrastructure: Focusing on Bridge Construction and Financial Losses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatemeh Jalayer & Raffaele Risi & Francesco Paola & Maurizio Giugni & Gaetano Manfredi & Paolo Gasparini & Maria Topa & Nebyou Yonas & Kumelachew Yeshitela & Alemu Nebebe & Gina Cavan & Sarah Lindley , 2014. "Probabilistic GIS-based method for delineation of urban flooding risk hotspots," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 975-1001, September.
    2. Ji-Myong Kim & Junseo Bae & Seunghyun Son & Kiyoung Son & Sang-Guk Yum, 2021. "Development of Model to Predict Natural Disaster-Induced Financial Losses for Construction Projects Using Deep Learning Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Anna Rita Scorzini & Maurizio Leopardi, 2017. "River basin planning: from qualitative to quantitative flood risk assessment: the case of Abruzzo Region (central Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 71-93, August.
    4. Morteza T. Marvi, 2020. "A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(3), pages 967-995, July.
    5. Albert S. Chen & Michael J. Hammond & Slobodan Djordjević & David Butler & David M. Khan & William Veerbeek, 2016. "From hazard to impact: flood damage assessment tools for mega cities," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 857-890, June.
    6. H. Moel & J. Aerts, 2011. "Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(1), pages 407-425, July.
    7. Nofal, Omar M. & van de Lindt, John W. & Do, Trung Q., 2020. "Multi-variate and single-variable flood fragility and loss approaches for buildings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    8. Cavalieri, Francesco & Franchin, Paolo & Giovinazzi, Sonia, 2023. "Multi-hazard assessment of increased flooding hazard due to earthquake-induced damage to the natural drainage system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Rosa Fernández Ropero & María Julia Flores & Rafael Rumí, 2022. "Bayesian Networks for Preprocessing Water Management Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Van Lantz & Ryan Trenholm & Jeff Wilson & William Richards, 2012. "Assessing market and non-market costs of freshwater flooding due to climate change in the community of Fredericton, Eastern Canada," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 347-372, January.
    11. Heidi Kreibich & Anna Botto & Bruno Merz & Kai Schröter, 2017. "Probabilistic, Multivariable Flood Loss Modeling on the Mesoscale with BT‐FLEMO," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 774-787, April.
    12. Santiago Gaitan & Marie-claire ten Veldhuis & Nick Giesen, 2015. "Spatial Distribution of Flood Incidents Along Urban Overland Flow-Paths," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(9), pages 3387-3399, July.
    13. H. Moel & B. Jongman & H. Kreibich & B. Merz & E. Penning-Rowsell & P. Ward, 2015. "Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 865-890, August.
    14. Łukasz Kuźmiński & Michał Nadolny & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2020. "Probabilistic Quantification in the Analysis of Flood Risks in Cross-Border Areas of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    15. María Bermúdez & Andreas Paul Zischg, 2018. "Sensitivity of flood loss estimates to building representation and flow depth attribution methods in micro-scale flood modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1633-1648, July.
    16. Himadri Sen Gupta & Omar M. Nofal & Andrés D. González & Charles D. Nicholson & John W. van de Lindt, 2022. "Optimal Selection of Short- and Long-Term Mitigation Strategies for Buildings within Communities under Flooding Hazard," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Andrea M. Juarez-Lucas & Kelly M. Kibler & Miho Ohara & Takahiro Sayama, 2016. "Benefits of flood-prone land use and the role of coping capacity, Candaba floodplains, Philippines," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 2243-2264, December.
    18. Shokhrukh-Mirzo Jalilov & Mohamed Kefi & Pankaj Kumar & Yoshifumi Masago & Binaya Kumar Mishra, 2018. "Sustainable Urban Water Management: Application for Integrated Assessment in Southeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Junqi Li & Haohan Zhang & Xiaoran Zhang & Wenliang Wang, 2023. "Establishment and Application of a Specialized Physical Examination Indicator System for Urban Waterlogging Risk in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Aaron B. Gertz & James B. Davies & Samantha L. Black, 2019. "A CGE Framework for Modeling the Economics of Flooding and Recovery in a Major Urban Area," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1314-1341, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13817-:d:952194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.