IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i5d10.1007_s11069-023-06371-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unravelling increasing flood hazard and influential factors in a tidal river

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Wu

    (Hohai University
    Pearl River Water Resources Research Institute
    Key Laboratory of Pearl River Estuary Regulation and Protection
    Hohai University)

  • Wei Zhang

    (Hohai University
    Hohai University)

  • Xiaozhang Hu

    (Pearl River Water Resources Research Institute
    Key Laboratory of Pearl River Estuary Regulation and Protection)

  • Chen Lu

    (Pearl River Water Resources Research Institute
    Key Laboratory of Pearl River Estuary Regulation and Protection
    Southern Laboratory of Ocean Science and Engineering)

  • Shiyou Gao

    (Pearl River Water Resources Research Institute
    Key Laboratory of Pearl River Estuary Regulation and Protection)

Abstract

Flood disasters are destructive especially in prosperous and urbanized estuarine regions, where the flood regime is much more complex due to multiple fluvial–estuarine impacts. The Shenzhen River (SZR), located in one of the most prosperous regions of southern China, is vulnerable to increasing flood risk. Unravelling the influential factors is of particular significance to flood hazards prevention and urban safety for the SZR. Based on the field-measured floods on June 13, 2008 (“2008.06”) and August 29, 2018 (“2018.08”) with roughly equal magnitudes of rainfall and tide, the changing flood risk in the SZR basin was assessed. Considering the substantial development of tidal flat plants in the past two decades, a physical model of the SZR was built to quantify the impacts of changing river regime on the flood stage. The model covers the whole mainstream of tidal reach and half of the Shenzhen Bay (SZB), which was well calibrated and validated by in situ flow process. Several situations with different ranges of riverine vegetation and estuarine mangrove, including all vegetation (actual situation), half vegetation, no vegetation, mangrove in 2002 and 2018, were modelled to explore flood stage variations in 2-yr and 50-yr return period. The results found that the “2018.08” flood stage was about 1.4 m higher than “2008.06” flood. Moreover, the rainfall–runoff duration in “2018.08” was significantly decreased by 1 h less than that of “2008.06” flood, indicating increased flood risk in the SZR. The flood stage in the middle reach increases by more than 0.6 m driven by the riverine vegetation during the 50-yr return period flood, while the flood stage rises less than 0.1 m for the flood with 2-yr return period. Moreover, the extended estuarine mangrove forest resulted in about 0.2 m flood stage increment in the lower reach. The effects of sea level rise and sediment deposition after channel dredging on the flood risk in the SZR were further discussed. The effects of sea level rise and sediment deposition after channel dredging on flood risk were further discussed in the SZR. Channel infilling probably causes a flood stage increase of approximately 0.5 m for all reaches, while the influence of sea level is relatively slight but cumulative. Sufficient river management and planning, such as seasonal removal of riverine vegetation, mangrove management and regular topography surveys, should be taken into consideration in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Wu & Wei Zhang & Xiaozhang Hu & Chen Lu & Shiyou Gao, 2024. "Unravelling increasing flood hazard and influential factors in a tidal river," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(5), pages 4083-4100, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06371-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06371-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06371-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06371-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06371-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.