IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/josatr/v3y2018i1d10.1186_s41072-018-0030-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transshipment hub port selection criteria by shipping lines: the case of hub ports around the bay of Bengal

Author

Listed:
  • Chathumi Kavirathna

    (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

  • Tomoya Kawasaki

    (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

  • Shinya Hanaoka

    (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

  • Takuma Matsuda

    (Japan Maritime Center)

Abstract

With the competitive nature of the liner shipping industry, the transshipment hub port selection process has become complicated with numerous decision-making criteria that need to be considered, and competition between hub ports has accelerated across different regions. The emergence of different liner service networks, such as “hub and spoke” and “relay,” has also intensified the complexity of the hub port selection process. The overlapping of maritime markets simultaneously served by multiple competitive hub ports has offered various hub port choices for shipping lines. Therefore, the criteria for hub port selection for both hub and spoke and relay networks are separately discussed in this study, which evaluates the performances of four competitive hub ports located around the Bay of Bengal: Colombo, Singapore, Kelang, and Tanjung Pelepas. The hub port selection criteria are evaluated based on the monetary, time, port traffic, location, operation, and liner-related categories using a questionnaire survey administered to shipping lines. The results provide a detailed discussion on the significant criteria for both network types and also highlight the dominant performance of the Singapore port and the performance of the other hub ports based on the individual criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Chathumi Kavirathna & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka & Takuma Matsuda, 2018. "Transshipment hub port selection criteria by shipping lines: the case of hub ports around the bay of Bengal," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:3:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-018-0030-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s41072-018-0030-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s41072-018-0030-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s41072-018-0030-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothea Bowyer & Glenda Davis, 2012. "How to acquire aircraft? A grounded theory approach to case study research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 363-397, November.
    2. Yap, Wei Yim & Lam, Jasmine S.L., 2006. "Competition dynamics between container ports in East Asia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 35-51, January.
    3. Ishii, Masahiro & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo & Tezuka, Koichiro & Chang, Young-Tae, 2013. "A game theoretical analysis of port competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 92-106.
    4. Adolf K.Y. Ng & Zaili Yang & Stephen Cahoon & Paul T.W. Lee & Dago Alain Gohomene & Zaili l. Yang & Stephen Bonsal & Eleftherios Maistralis & Jin Wang & Kevin X. Li, 2016. "The Attractiveness of Ports in West Africa: Some Lessons from Shipping Lines' Port Selection," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 416-426, September.
    5. Chang, Young-Tae & Lee, Sang-Yoon & Tongzon, Jose L., 2008. "Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 877-885, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    2. Muhammad Reza Bagus & Shinya Hanaoka, 2023. "Interdependency patterns of potential seaport risk factors in relation to supply chain disruption in Indonesia," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Dario Medić & Srećko Krile & Igor Jelaska & Rino Bošnjak, 2021. "Adriatic Sea Hub Ports Feeder Service Optimization Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Junayed Pasha & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Masoud Kavoosi & Olumide F. Abioye & Oluwatosin Theophilus & Hui Wang & Raphael Kampmann & Weihong Guo, 2020. "Holistic tactical-level planning in liner shipping: an exact optimization approach," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-35, December.
    5. Samia Bouazza & Zoubida Benmamoun & Hanaa Hachimi, 2023. "Maritime Bilateral Connectivity Analysis for Sustainable Maritime Growth: Case of Morocco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Felipe Lobo Umbelino Souza & Cira Souza Pitombo & Dong Yang, 2021. "Port choice in Brazil: a qualitative research related to in-depth interviews," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qu, Chenrui & Wang, Grace W.Y. & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2017. "Modelling port subsidy policies considering pricing decisions of feeder carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 115-133.
    2. (Kevin) Park, Hyosoo & Chang, Young-Tae & Zou, Bo, 2018. "Emission control under private port operator duopoly," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 40-65.
    3. Twrdy, Elen & Batista, Milan, 2016. "Modeling of container throughput in Northern Adriatic ports over the period 1990–2013," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 131-142.
    4. Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang & Miao, Lixin, 2016. "Delimiting port hinterlands based on intermodal network flows: Model and algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 32-51.
    5. Yeo, Gi-Tae & Pak, Ji-Yeong & Yang, Zaili, 2013. "Analysis of dynamic effects on seaports adopting port security policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 285-301.
    6. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    7. Song, Dong-Ping & Lyons, Andrew & Li, Dong & Sharifi, Hossein, 2016. "Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 75-96.
    8. Shi, Jia & Jiao, Yuquan & Chen, Jihong & Ye, Jun & Gong, Jianwei, 2023. "A study on the evolution of competition pattern of inland container ports along the Yangtze River in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Luo, Meifeng & Chen, Fuying & Zhang, Jiantong, 2022. "Relationships among port competition, cooperation and competitiveness: A literature review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain & Farjana Nur & Raed Jaradat & Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Stephen M. Puryear & Randy K. Buchanan, 2019. "Metrics for Assessing Overall Performance of Inland Waterway Ports: A Bayesian Network Based Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-17, May.
    11. Liu, Jiaguo & Wang, Junjin, 2019. "Carrier alliance incentive analysis and coordination in a maritime transport chain based on service competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 333-355.
    12. Zeng, Qingcheng & Wang, Grace W.Y. & Qu, Chenrui & Li, Kevin X., 2018. "Impact of the Carat Canal on the evolution of hub ports under China’s Belt and Road initiative," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 96-107.
    13. Hoshi Tagawa & Tomoya Kawasaki & Shinya Hanaoka, 2021. "Conditions influencing the choice between direct shipment and transshipment in maritime shipping network," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Achilleas Tsantis & John Mangan & Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin, 2023. "Container shipping: a systematic literature review of themes and factors that influence the establishment of direct connections between countries," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 667-697, December.
    15. Hokey Min & Byung-In Park, 2020. "A two-dimensional approach to assessing the impact of port selection factors on port competitiveness using the Kano model," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 353-382, September.
    16. Mingzhu Yu & Chung-Yee Lee & James Jixian Wang, 2017. "The regional port competition with different terminal competition intensity," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 659-688, December.
    17. Wang, Fan & Zhuo, Xiaopo & Niu, Baozhuang & He, Jiayi, 2017. "Who canvasses for cargos? Incentive analysis and channel structure in a shipping supply chain," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 78-101.
    18. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Figueiredo De Oliveira, Gabriel & Cariou, Pierre, 2015. "The impact of competition on container port (in)efficiency," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 124-133.
    20. Cheng-Hsien Hsieh, 2014. "Disaster risk assessment of ports based on the perspective of vulnerability," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 851-864, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:josatr:v:3:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s41072-018-0030-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.