IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jmgtco/v35y2024i4d10.1007_s00187-024-00384-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transparency in performance measurement systems: an exploration of rationales and diverging perceptions in the hospital setting

Author

Listed:
  • Maik Lachmann

    (Technical University of Berlin)

  • Rouven Trapp

    (Ulm University)

  • Felix Wenger

    (Dortmund University of Applied Science and Arts)

Abstract

As a consequence of an increasing economization of the healthcare sector, hospitals need to accommodate professional and managerial logics. This paper studies transparency in performance measurement systems (PMSs) and its potential to combine these logics, with the ultimate aim of mitigating tensions commonly observed in hospitals. Based on a multiple case study of four German nonprofit hospitals, we shed light on the administrators’ rationales to incorporate different levels of transparency into PMSs and illuminate the physicians’ perceptions of these different levels and their responses to them. We find that the anticipation of whether PMS transparency will initiate a profit-centric constructive benchmarking, potentially alleviating tensions between administrators and physicians, or result in a rather destructive competition between departments, leading to tensions among physicians, is crucial in administrators’ decisions on PMS transparency. We further detect gaps in the perceptions of administrators and physicians regarding transparency, anchored in issues related to controllability, reliability and comprehensibility. We find that PMS transparency may support physicians in combining professional and managerial logics at the departmental level with potentially adverse implications for departments’ contributions to the organizational objectives. Overall, the evidence provided in this paper reveals the dual nature of PMS transparency, as it may raise tensions among physicians while simultaneously mitigating tensions between physicians and administrators. By exploring the multi-layered dynamics surrounding PMS transparency, we offer a more nuanced account of PMS transparency than prior research and conclude that PMS transparency may not be a panacea in hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Maik Lachmann & Rouven Trapp & Felix Wenger, 2024. "Transparency in performance measurement systems: an exploration of rationales and diverging perceptions in the hospital setting," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 467-507, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:35:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s00187-024-00384-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-024-00384-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00187-024-00384-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-024-00384-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aziza Laguecir & Christopher Chapman & Florian Gebreiter & Célia Lemaire, 2024. "Patient empowerment in public healthcare funding system reform: a power network perspective," Post-Print hal-04617978, HAL.
    2. Victor S. Maas & Marcel Van Rinsum, 2013. "How Control System Design Influences Performance Misreporting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 1159-1186, December.
    3. Chapman, Christopher S. & Kihn, Lili-Anne, 2009. "Information system integration, enabling control and performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 151-169, February.
    4. Jonas Schreyögg & Oliver Tiemann & Reinhard Busse, 2006. "Cost accounting to determine prices: How well do prices reflect costs in the German DRG-system?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 269-279, August.
    5. Clinton Free, 2007. "Supply†Chain Accounting Practices in the UK Retail Sector: Enabling or Coercing Collaboration?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 897-933, September.
    6. Hans Englund & Jonas Gerdin, 2015. "Developing Enabling Performance Measurement Systems: On the Interplay Between Numbers and Operational Knowledge," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 277-303, June.
    7. Lukas Goretzki & Erik Strauss & Leona Wiegmann, 2018. "Exploring the Roles of Vernacular Accounting Systems in the Development of “Enabling” Global Accounting and Control Systems," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 1888-1916, December.
    8. Maik Lachmann & Rouven Trapp & Felix Wenger, 2016. "Performance Measurement and Compensation Practices in Hospitals: An Empirical Analysis in Consideration of Ownership Types," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 661-686, October.
    9. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2004. "Power, organization design and managerial behaviour," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 207-225.
    10. Abernethy, Margaret A. & Stoelwinder, Johannes U., 1995. "The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Eddy Cardinaels & Naomi Soderstrom, 2013. "Managing in a Complex World: Accounting and Governance Choices in Hospitals," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 647-684, December.
    12. Emiel Kerpershoek & Martijn Groenleer & Hans de Bruijn, 2016. "Unintended responses to performance management in dutch hospital care: Bringing together the managerial and professional perspectives," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 417-436, March.
    13. Wouters, Marc & Wilderom, Celeste, 2008. "Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 488-516.
    14. Margaret A. Abernethy & Wai Fong Chua, 1996. "A Field Study of Control System “Redesign†: The Impact of Institutional Processes on Strategic Choice," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 569-606, September.
    15. Ahrens, Thomas & Chapman, Christopher S., 2006. "Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 819-841, November.
    16. Thomas Ahrens & Christopher S. Chapman, 2004. "Accounting for Flexibility and Efficiency: A Field Study of Management Control Systems in a Restaurant Chain," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 271-301, June.
    17. Grossi, Giuseppe & Laguecir, Aziza & Ferry, Laurence & Tucker, Basil, 2024. "Accounting and accountability for managing diversity tensions in hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    18. Martin Holzhacker & Ranjani Krishnan & Matthias D. Mahlendorf, 2015. "The Impact of Changes in Regulation on Cost Behavior," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 534-566, June.
    19. Tiemann, Oliver & Schreyögg, Jonas & Busse, Reinhard, 2012. "Hospital ownership and efficiency: A review of studies with particular focus on Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 163-171.
    20. Bol, Jasmijn C. & Kramer, Stephan & Maas, Victor S., 2016. "How control system design affects performance evaluation compression: The role of information accuracy and outcome transparency," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 64-73.
    21. Irvine Lapsley, 2001. "The Accounting–Clinical Interface—Implementing Budgets for Hospital Doctors," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 37(1), pages 79-109, February.
    22. Jordan, Silvia & Messner, Martin, 2012. "Enabling control and the problem of incomplete performance indicators," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 544-564.
    23. Chua, Wai Fong, 1995. "Experts, networks and inscriptions in the fabrication of accounting images: A story of the representation of three public hospitals," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(2-3), pages 111-145.
    24. Marc Wouters & Diana Roijmans, 2011. "Using Prototypes to Induce Experimentation and Knowledge Integration in the Development of Enabling Accounting Information," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 708-736, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bisbe, Josep & Kruis, Anne-Marie & Madini, Paola, 2019. "Coercive, enabling, diagnostic, and interactive control: Untangling the threads of their connections," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 124-144.
    2. Leanne Johnstone, 2019. "Theorising and conceptualising the sustainability control system for effective sustainability management," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 25-64, April.
    3. Giovannoni, Elena & Quarchioni, Sonia, 2019. "Exploring the generative power of performance measurement systems design," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 211-225.
    4. van Erp, Wil & Roozen, Frans & Vosselman, Ed, 2019. "The performativity of a management accounting and control system: Exploring the dynamic relational consequences of a design," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    5. Palermo, Tommaso & Power, Michael & Ashby, Simon, 2022. "How accounting ends: self-undermining repetition in accounting lifecycles," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115278, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Benjamin Benoit, 2014. "Is there a manager in the plane ? The remarquable absence of the manager in enabling control [Y a-t-il un manager dans l'avion ? Ou la relative absence du manager dans les approches capacitantes du," Post-Print hal-01899013, HAL.
    7. Brown, Paul & Ly, Tuan & Pham, Hannah & Sivabalan, Prabhu, 2020. "Automation and management control in dynamic environments: Managing organisational flexibility and energy efficiency in service sectors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    8. Maik Lachmann & Rouven Trapp & Felix Wenger, 2016. "Performance Measurement and Compensation Practices in Hospitals: An Empirical Analysis in Consideration of Ownership Types," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 661-686, October.
    9. Thomas Borup Kristensen & Henrik Saabye, 2021. "Increasing the enabling use of performance measures: a longitudinal quasi natural experiment," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 401-433, September.
    10. Leanne Johnstone, 2021. "Facilitating sustainability control in SMEs through the implementation of an environmental management system," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 559-605, December.
    11. Kraus, Kalle & Kennergren, Cecilia & von Unge, Amelie, 2017. "The interplay between ideological control and formal management control systems – A case study of a non-governmental organisation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 42-59.
    12. Chenhall, Robert H. & Hall, Matthew & Smith, David, 2013. "Performance measurement, modes of evaluation and the development of compromising accounts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51294, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Paula M. G. Veen-Dirks & Marijke C. Leliveld & Wesley Kaufmann, 2021. "The effect of enabling versus coercive performance measurement systems on procedural fairness and red tape," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 269-294, June.
    14. Jordan, Silvia & Messner, Martin, 2012. "Enabling control and the problem of incomplete performance indicators," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 544-564.
    15. Robbins, Geraldine & Lapsley, Irvine, 2015. "From secrecy to transparency: Accounting and the transition from religious charity to publicly-owned hospital," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 19-32.
    16. Boedker, Christina & Chong, Kar-Ming & Mouritsen, Jan, 2020. "The counter-performativity of calculative practices: Mobilising rankings of intellectual capital," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Carr, Michelle & Beck, Matthias, 2022. "Accounting practices and professional power dynamics during a crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(3).
    18. E. Van Der Hauwaert & W. Bruggeman, 2012. "The balanced scorecard as an enabling technology – the role of participation," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 12/816, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    19. Bedford, David S. & Speklé, Roland F. & Widener, Sally K., 2022. "Budgeting and employee stress in times of crisis: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Maleen Z. Gong & Nava Subramaniam, 2020. "Principal leadership style and school performance: mediating roles of risk management culture and management control systems use in Australian schools," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 2427-2466, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Transparency; Hospitals; Performance measurement systems; Enabling controls; Perception gaps;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:35:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s00187-024-00384-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.