Author
Abstract
Virtual learning communities filled with rich gamification elements are convenient for learners. Exploring the impact of gamification in virtual learning communities has become an important topic. However, the impact of different types of gamification elements on users varies. The impact is not only positive but also negative. In addition to learning behavior, users’ sharing behavior is also important for improving learning efficiency and community activity and deserves to be investigated. Therefore, this study combines the technology acceptance model and privacy paradox theory to discuss the two-sided effects of three types of gamification elements (achievement, social, and immersion) on users’ perceived benefits (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) and perceived risks (perceived privacy risks) in virtual learning communities, as well as the role of these effects in fostering users’ sharing intentions and behaviors. In this study, 483 respondents’ data were collected from 11 virtual learning communities for PLS-SEM analysis. The findings indicate that achievement and social elements positively influence perceived usefulness and ease of use, while immersion elements are related only to perceived ease of use. Social factors had a positive effect on perceived privacy risk. Furthermore, perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly influenced sharing intentions and behaviors, while perceived privacy risk had a negative impact. This study distinguishes between different gamification elements in virtual learning communities and constructs a model of the two-sided effect of gamification on user sharing, which complements previous studies and provides practical insights for community managers. Graphical Abstract
Suggested Citation
Yongzhong Yang & Aixian Yu & Jinjing Li & Mohsin Shafi & Linling Zhong, 2025.
"Would You Like to Share? The Influence of Gamification in the Virtual Learning Community,"
Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11643-11672, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02243-x
DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02243-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02243-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.