IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v16y2025i3d10.1007_s13132-024-02243-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Would You Like to Share? The Influence of Gamification in the Virtual Learning Community

Author

Listed:
  • Yongzhong Yang

    (Sichuan University)

  • Aixian Yu

    (Sichuan University)

  • Jinjing Li

    (Yibin Development Holding Group Co. Ltd)

  • Mohsin Shafi

    (Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
    Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences)

  • Linling Zhong

    (Sichuan University)

Abstract

Virtual learning communities filled with rich gamification elements are convenient for learners. Exploring the impact of gamification in virtual learning communities has become an important topic. However, the impact of different types of gamification elements on users varies. The impact is not only positive but also negative. In addition to learning behavior, users’ sharing behavior is also important for improving learning efficiency and community activity and deserves to be investigated. Therefore, this study combines the technology acceptance model and privacy paradox theory to discuss the two-sided effects of three types of gamification elements (achievement, social, and immersion) on users’ perceived benefits (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) and perceived risks (perceived privacy risks) in virtual learning communities, as well as the role of these effects in fostering users’ sharing intentions and behaviors. In this study, 483 respondents’ data were collected from 11 virtual learning communities for PLS-SEM analysis. The findings indicate that achievement and social elements positively influence perceived usefulness and ease of use, while immersion elements are related only to perceived ease of use. Social factors had a positive effect on perceived privacy risk. Furthermore, perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly influenced sharing intentions and behaviors, while perceived privacy risk had a negative impact. This study distinguishes between different gamification elements in virtual learning communities and constructs a model of the two-sided effect of gamification on user sharing, which complements previous studies and provides practical insights for community managers. Graphical Abstract

Suggested Citation

  • Yongzhong Yang & Aixian Yu & Jinjing Li & Mohsin Shafi & Linling Zhong, 2025. "Would You Like to Share? The Influence of Gamification in the Virtual Learning Community," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11643-11672, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02243-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02243-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-02243-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-02243-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Rayna & Ludmila Striukova, 2021. "Involving Consumers: The Role of Digital Technologies in Promoting ‘Prosumption’ and User Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 218-237, March.
    2. Willems, Kim, 2022. "Brand personality appeal in retailing: Comparing fashion- and grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Millissa F. Y. Cheung & W. M. To, 2021. "The Effect of Consumer Perceptions of the Ethics of Retailers on Purchase Behavior and Word-of-Mouth: The Moderating Role of Ethical Beliefs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 771-788, July.
    4. Alenka Brezavšček & Janja Jerebic & Gregor Rus & Anja Žnidaršič, 2020. "Factors Influencing Mathematics Achievement of University Students of Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Roopesh Kevin Sungkur & Olivier Sebastien & Upasana Gitanjali Singh, 2020. "Social Media as a Catalyst for Distant Collaborative Learning: Trends and Concerns for Small Island States," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1454-1469, December.
    6. Hiroko Kamide, 2021. "The Effect of Social Cohesion on Interest, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of a Driving Assistance System in Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    7. Gieure, Clara & Benavides-Espinosa, María del Mar & Roig-Dobón, Salvador, 2020. "The entrepreneurial process: The link between intentions and behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 541-548.
    8. Thang Nguyen & Marc Weinstein & Alan Meyer, 2005. "Development of Trust: A Study of Interfirm Relationships in Vietnam," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 211-235, September.
    9. Michael Nofer & Oliver Hinz & Jan Muntermann & Heiko Roßnagel, 2014. "The Economic Impact of Privacy Violations and Security Breaches," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(6), pages 339-348, December.
    10. Hwang, Jiyoung & Choi, Laee, 2020. "Having fun while receiving rewards?: Exploration of gamification in loyalty programs for consumer loyalty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 365-376.
    11. Jakub Swacha, 2015. "Gamification In Knowledge Management: Motivating For Knowledge Sharing," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(2), pages 150-160, December.
    12. Yannic Meier & Johanna Schäwel & Nicole C. Krämer, 2020. "The Shorter the Better? Effects of Privacy Policy Length on Online Privacy Decision-Making," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 291-301.
    13. Rowe, Frantz, 2020. "Contact tracing apps and values dilemmas: A privacy paradox in a neo-liberal world," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    14. Nofer, Michael & Hinz, Oliver & Muntermann, Jan & Rossnagel, Heiko, 2014. "The Economic Impact of Privacy Violations and Security Breaches - A Laboratory Experiment," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 69932, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    15. Akdim, Khaoula & Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Carlos, 2022. "The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Robson, Karen & Plangger, Kirk & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian & Pitt, Leyland, 2016. "Game on: Engaging customers and employees through gamification," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 29-36.
    17. Chia-Huei Wu & Lung Chen & Ying-Mei Tsai, 2009. "Investigating Importance Weighting of Satisfaction Scores from a Formative Model with Partial Least Squares Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 351-363, February.
    18. Wei Liu & Yue Wang & Zhixin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of continuous use behavior in virtual learning community," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Yannic Meier & Johanna Schäwel & Nicole C. Krämer, 2020. "The Shorter the Better? Effects of Privacy Policy Length on Online Privacy Decision-Making," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 291-301.
    20. Rami S. Al-Gharaibeh & Mostafa Z. Ali, 2022. "Knowledge Sharing Framework: a Game-Theoretic Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 332-366, March.
    21. Ni Huang & Gordon Burtch & Bin Gu & Yili Hong & Chen Liang & Kanliang Wang & Dongpu Fu & Bo Yang, 2019. "Motivating User-Generated Content with Performance Feedback: Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 327-345, January.
    22. Wei Chen & Bin Gu & Qiang Ye & Kevin Xiaoguo Zhu, 2019. "Measuring and Managing the Externality of Managerial Responses to Online Customer Reviews," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 81-96, March.
    23. Xu, Feifei & Buhalis, Dimitrios & Weber, Jessika, 2017. "Serious games and the gamification of tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 244-256.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharma, Wamika & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Verma, Aastha & Kumra, Rajeev, 2024. "Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Bitrián, Paula & Buil, Isabel & Catalán, Sara, 2021. "Enhancing user engagement: The role of gamification in mobile apps," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 170-185.
    3. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    4. Zhani, Najlae & Mouri, Nacef & Ahmed, Tariq, 2022. "The role of mobile value and trust as drivers of purchase intentions in m-servicescape," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. K. Valerie Carl & Cristina Mihale-Wilson & Jan Zibuschka & Oliver Hinz, 2024. "A consumer perspective on Corporate Digital Responsibility: an empirical evaluation of consumer preferences," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(7), pages 979-1024, October.
    6. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2020. "Does gamification affect brand engagement and equity? A study in online brand communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 449-460.
    7. da Fonseca, André Luís A. & Chimenti, Paula & Campos, Roberta D., 2023. "‘Take my advice’: Entrepreneurial consumers and the ecosystemic logics of digital platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Friedrich, Julia & Becker, Michael & Kramer, Frederik & Wirth, Markus & Schneider, Martin, 2020. "Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 341-352.
    9. Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan & Feng, Wenting, 2019. "Walking for fun or for “likes”? The impacts of different gamification orientations of fitness apps on consumers’ physical activities," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 682-693.
    10. Bianca Weber‐Lewerenz & Marzia Traverso, 2025. "How can corporate digital responsibility (CDR) be measured in line with corporate social responsibility (CSR)? A new theoretical approach in construction 4.0," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 287-308, February.
    11. Feng, Wenting & Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan, 2020. "Can gamification increases consumers’ engagement in fitness apps? The moderating role of commensurability of the game elements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    12. Chang, Shuchih Ernest & Shen, Wei-Cheng & Liu, Anne Yenching, 2016. "Why mobile users trust smartphone social networking services? A PLS-SEM approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4890-4895.
    13. Henner Gimpel & Dominikus Kleindienst & Niclas Nüske & Daniel Rau & Fabian Schmied, 2018. "The upside of data privacy – delighting customers by implementing data privacy measures," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(4), pages 437-452, November.
    14. Saima Hussain & Sara Qazi & Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Dalia Streimikiene & Jolita Vveinhardt, 2018. "Employees Management: Evidence from Gamification Techniques," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 97-107.
    15. Foecking, Nico & Wang, Mei & Huynh, Toan Luu Duc, 2021. "How do investors react to the data breaches news? Empirical evidence from Facebook Inc. during the years 2016–2019," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Frederik Hering & Oliver Hinz & Jella Pfeiffer & Wil Aalst, 2025. "The Damocles Sword of Cyber Attacks," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 67(2), pages 141-147, April.
    17. Annika Baumann & Johannes Haupt & Fabian Gebert & Stefan Lessmann, 2019. "The Price of Privacy," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 413-431, August.
    18. Pedro Palos-Sanchez & Jose Ramon Saura & Marisol B. Correia, 2021. "Do tourism applications’ quality and user experience influence its acceptance by tourists?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1205-1241, July.
    19. Wu Zhan & Roger Chen & M. Erramilli & Duc Nguyen, 2009. "Acquisition of organizational capabilities and competitive advantage of IJVs in transition economies: The case of Vietnam," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 285-308, June.
    20. Uglješa Stankov & Ulrike Gretzel, 2020. "Tourism 4.0 technologies and tourist experiences: a human-centered design perspective," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 477-488, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02243-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.