IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jclass/v42y2025i1d10.1007_s00357-024-09488-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-task Support Vector Machine Classifier with Generalized Huber Loss

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Liu

    (Tianjin Agricultural University)

  • Wenxin Zhu

    (Tianjin Agricultural University)

  • Zhengming Dai

    (Institute of Electronic Standardization Technology)

  • Zhihong Ma

    (Tianjin Agricultural University)

Abstract

Compared to single-task learning (STL), multi-task learning (MTL) achieves a better generalization by exploiting domain-specific information implicit in the training signals of several related tasks. The adaptation of MTL to support vector machines (SVMs) is a rather successful example. Inspired by the recently published generalized Huber loss SVM (GHSVM) and regularized multi-task learning (RMTL), we propose a novel generalized Huber loss multi-task support vector machine including linear and non-linear cases for binary classification, named as MTL-GHSVM. The new method extends the GHSVM from single-task to multi-task learning, and the application of Huber loss to MTL-SVM is innovative to the best of our knowledge. The proposed method has two main advantages: on the one hand, compared with SVMs with hinge loss and GHSVM, our MTL-GHSVM using the differentiable generalized Huber loss has better generalization performance; on the other hand, it adopts functional iteration to find the optimal solution, and does not need to solve a quadratic programming problem (QPP), which can significantly reduce the computational cost. Numerical experiments have been conducted on fifteen real datasets, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed multi-task classification algorithm compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Liu & Wenxin Zhu & Zhengming Dai & Zhihong Ma, 2025. "Multi-task Support Vector Machine Classifier with Generalized Huber Loss," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 42(1), pages 221-252, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00357-024-09488-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s00357-024-09488-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00357-024-09488-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00357-024-09488-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neeraj Arora & Greg M. Allenby & James L. Ginter, 1998. "A Hierarchical Bayes Model of Primary and Secondary Demand," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 29-44.
    2. Theodoros Evgeniou & Massimiliano Pontil & Olivier Toubia, 2007. "A Convex Optimization Approach to Modeling Consumer Heterogeneity in Conjoint Estimation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 805-818, 11-12.
    3. Allenby, Greg M. & Rossi, Peter E., 1998. "Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1-2), pages 57-78, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwangpil Chang & S. Siddarth & Charles B. Weinberg, 1999. "The Impact of Heterogeneity in Purchase Timing and Price Responsiveness on Estimates of Sticker Shock Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 178-192.
    2. Benoit Playe & Chloé-Agathe Azencott & Véronique Stoven, 2018. "Efficient multi-task chemogenomics for drug specificity prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-34, October.
    3. Liu, Jiapeng & Wang, Yan & Kadziński, Miłosz & Mao, Xiaoxin & Rao, Yuan, 2024. "A multiple criteria Bayesian hierarchical model for analyzing heterogeneous consumer preferences," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Revelt, David & Train, Kenneth, 2000. "Customer-Specific Taste Parameters and Mixed Logit: Households' Choice of Electricity Supplier," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt1900p96t, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    5. Yupeng Chen & Raghuram Iyengar & Garud Iyengar, 2017. "Modeling Multimodal Continuous Heterogeneity in Conjoint Analysis—A Sparse Learning Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 140-156, January.
    6. Jui-Sheng Chou & Dinh-Nhat Truong & Yonatan Che, 2020. "Optimized multi-output machine learning system for engineering informatics in assessing natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(3), pages 727-754, April.
    7. Peters, M. & Ketter, W., 2013. "Towards autonomous decision-making: A probabilistic model for learning multi-user preferences," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2013-007-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Jung-Kyu Jung & Jae Young Choi, 2022. "Choice and allocation characteristics of faculty time in Korea: effects of tenure, research performance, and external shock," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2847-2869, May.
    9. Patrick Bajari & Jeremy Fox & Stephen Ryan, 2008. "Evaluating wireless carrier consolidation using semiparametric demand estimation," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 299-338, December.
    10. Bond, Craig A. & Thilmany, Dawn D. & Bond, Jennifer Keeling, 2008. "What to Choose? The Value of Label Claims to Fresh Produce Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 1-26.
    11. Robert Zeithammer & Peter Lenk, 2006. "Bayesian estimation of multivariate-normal models when dimensions are absent," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 241-265, September.
    12. Jianhua Wang & Jiaye Ge & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Urban Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    13. James Agarwal & Wayne DeSarbo & Naresh K. Malhotra & Vithala Rao, 2015. "An Interdisciplinary Review of Research in Conjoint Analysis: Recent Developments and Directions for Future Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 19-40, March.
    14. Jentzsch, Nicola & Sapi, Geza & Suleymanova, Irina, 2013. "Targeted pricing and customer data sharing among rivals," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 131-144.
    15. Jaehwan Kim & Greg M. Allenby & Peter E. Rossi, 2002. "Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 229-250, December.
    16. Charles Cunningham & Ken Deal & Yvonne Chen, 2010. "Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 3(4), pages 257-273, December.
    17. Loaiza-Maya, Rubén & Smith, Michael Stanley & Nott, David J. & Danaher, Peter J., 2022. "Fast and accurate variational inference for models with many latent variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 339-362.
    18. Zhou, Yang & Shi, Zhixiong & Shi, Zhengyu & Gao, Qing & Wu, Libo, 2019. "Disaggregating power consumption of commercial buildings based on the finite mixture model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 35-46.
    19. Bhat, Chandra R., 2005. "A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 679-707, September.
    20. Kappe, Eelco & Stadler Blank, Ashley & DeSarbo, Wayne S., 2018. "A random coefficients mixture hidden Markov model for marketing research," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 415-431.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00357-024-09488-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.