IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infott/v26y2024i2d10.1007_s40558-024-00285-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the impact of autonomy on presence: a comparative analysis on sense of presence and telepresence

Author

Listed:
  • Guang Liu

    (Business School of Hunan University)

  • Boshi Tian

    (Business School of Hunan University)

Abstract

Virtual tourism has great potential for the tourism industry, but physical limitations in sensory experience and the possibility of symbolic images may impact authenticity and the feeling of freedom for tourists. We conduct a study to investigate how vividness, interactivity and autonomy affect tourists’ behavioral intention through the sense of presence and telepresence. Findings indicate that vividness and interactivity have a positive impact on tourists’ behavioral intention by the mediation of sense of presence and telepresence. Moreover, the results further demonstrate that autonomy exerts a significant impact exclusively on the sense of presence, without affecting telepresence. This study suggests that virtual tour developers should prioritize creating high-quality intermediary experiences by enhancing sensory dimensions and human-machine interaction. Meanwhile, respecting tourists’ autonomy and utilizing emerging technologies to enhance the overall enjoyment of the experience is also imperative.

Suggested Citation

  • Guang Liu & Boshi Tian, 2024. "Investigating the impact of autonomy on presence: a comparative analysis on sense of presence and telepresence," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 347-367, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40558-024-00285-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s40558-024-00285-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40558-024-00285-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40558-024-00285-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guttentag, Daniel A., 2010. "Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 637-651.
    2. Chris Zhu & Lawrence Hoc Nang Fong & Huicai Gao & Christy Ying Ni Liu, 2023. "When TikTok meets celebrity: an investigation of how celebrity attachment influences visit intention," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(17), pages 2762-2776, September.
    3. Eko Harry Pratisto & Nik Thompson & Vidyasagar Potdar, 2022. "Immersive technologies for tourism: a systematic review," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 181-219, June.
    4. Wai Han Lo & Ka Lun Benjamin Cheng, 2020. "Does virtual reality attract visitors? The mediating effect of presence on consumer response in virtual reality tourism advertising," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 537-562, December.
    5. Yuan Li & Jiaqi Liang & Jingxiong Huang & Mengsheng Yang & Runyan Li & Huanxia Bai, 2022. "Would You Accept Virtual Tourism? The Impact of COVID-19 Risk Perception on Technology Acceptance from a Comparative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Bo Wendy Gao & Chris Zhu & Hongmei Song & Ianthe M. Belisle Dempsey, 2022. "Interpreting the perceptions of authenticity in virtual reality tourism through postmodernist approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 31-55, March.
    7. Schiopu, Andreea Fortuna & Hornoiu, Remus Ion & Padurean, Ana Mihaela & Nica, Ana-Maria, 2022. "Constrained and virtually traveling? Exploring the effect of travel constraints on intention to use virtual reality in tourism," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Fuller, Christie M. & Simmering, Marcia J. & Atinc, Guclu & Atinc, Yasemin & Babin, Barry J., 2016. "Common methods variance detection in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3192-3198.
    9. Paolo Mura & Rokhshad Tavakoli & Saeed Pahlevan Sharif, 2017. "‘Authentic but not too much’: exploring perceptions of authenticity of virtual tourism," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 145-159, June.
    10. Kim, Myung Ja & Hall, C. Michael, 2019. "A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: Comparing visitors and non-visitors," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 236-249.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ettis, Saïd Aboubaker & Sellami, Achraf, 2025. "“I'll do it for myself†: Enhancing customer value through online product customization experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adel Ben Youssef & Adelina Zeqiri, 2022. "Hospitality Industry 4.0 and Climate Change," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1043-1063, September.
    2. Bo Wendy Gao & Chris Zhu & Hongmei Song & Ianthe M. Belisle Dempsey, 2022. "Interpreting the perceptions of authenticity in virtual reality tourism through postmodernist approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 31-55, March.
    3. Kostyk, Alena & Sheng, Jie, 2023. "VR in customer-centered marketing: Purpose-driven design," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 225-236.
    4. Schiopu, Andreea Fortuna & Hornoiu, Remus Ion & Padurean, Ana Mihaela & Nica, Ana-Maria, 2022. "Constrained and virtually traveling? Exploring the effect of travel constraints on intention to use virtual reality in tourism," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Biqiang Liu & Anna Kralj & Brent Moyle & Yaoqi Li, 2024. "Developing 360-degree stimuli for virtual tourism research: a five-step mixed measures procedure," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 485-519, September.
    6. Adelina Zeqiri, 2024. "Virtual tourism as a substitute for physical tourism during COVID-19 pandemic," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 26(2), pages 125-144, April.
    7. Roh, Taewoo & Xiao, Shufeng & Park, Byung Il, 2024. "What makes metaverse users immersed in the flow state in an emerging market? An application of affordance theory and ISSM," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Maksim Godovykh & Carissa Baker & Alan Fyall, 2022. "VR in Tourism: A New Call for Virtual Tourism Experience amid and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11, February.
    9. Rajat Kumar Behera & Pradip Kumar Bala & Nripendra P. Rana, 2024. "Reaching new heights: investigating adoption factors shaping the moon landing of metaverse tourism," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 219-253, June.
    10. Debolina Dutta & Yuvaraj Srivastava & Eshmeeta Singh, 2023. "Metaverse in the tourism sector for talent management: a technology in practice lens," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 331-365, September.
    11. Cowan, Kirsten & Ketron, Seth & Kostyk, Alena & Kristofferson, Kirk, 2023. "Can you smell the (virtual) roses? The influence of olfactory cues in virtual reality on immersion and positive brand responses," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 385-399.
    12. Nieves-Pavón, Sergio & López-Mosquera, Natalia & Jiménez-Naranjo, Héctor, 2023. "The factors influencing STD through SOR theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Christine Petr & Paul Caudan, 2024. "Ethical marketing framework for metaverse simulated experiences of tourism (SET): An exploration of consumers’ aspirations and fears," Post-Print hal-04554364, HAL.
    14. Yu Li & HakJun Song & Rui Guo, 2021. "A Study on the Causal Process of Virtual Reality Tourism and Its Attributes in Terms of Their Effects on Subjective Well-Being during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Xueyan(Even) Xu & Jiahui Huang & Dan Huang & Xinyu Shang, 2023. "Will a technology-featured authentic shopping environment motivate participants’ purchasing behavior in tourism live-streamed shopping?," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 635-663, December.
    16. Xiaohong Wu & Ivan Ka Wai Lai, 2022. "The use of 360-degree virtual tours to promote mountain walking tourism: stimulus–organism–response model," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 85-107, March.
    17. Nurul Hidayah Azhar & Siti Nurrubiatul Qistina Fadil & Nordini Rosmi & Noordiana Sukur, 2024. "The Effects of Virtual Reality Technology on Visitor Satisfaction in the Theme Park," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 3771-3783, September.
    18. Kichan Nam & Jeff Baker & Christopher S. Dutt, 2024. "Does familiarity with the attraction matter? Antecedents of satisfaction with virtual reality for heritage tourism," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 25-57, March.
    19. Petr, Christine & Caudan, Paul, 2024. "Ethical marketing framework for metaverse simulated experiences of tourism (SET): An exploration of consumers’ aspirations and fears," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Yuen, Kum Fai & Koh, Le Yi & Tan, Luan Yi Hazel & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "The determinants of virtual reality adoption for marine conservation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:26:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s40558-024-00285-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.