IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infott/v25y2023i2d10.1007_s40558-023-00252-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology and museum visitor experiences: a four stage model of evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Siqi Emily Lu

    (Griffith University)

  • Brent Moyle

    (Griffith University)

  • Sacha Reid

    (Griffith University)

  • Elaine Yang

    (Griffith University)

  • Biqiang Liu

    (Griffith University)

Abstract

Research on technology and museum visitor experiences has experienced exponential growth. Despite this, limited studies explicitly examine existing progress in research on the intersection between technology and museum visitor experiences. Specifically, there is limited understanding of how topics studied, and the concepts, theories, models, and frameworks embedded within have evolved in congruence with the forms and types of technology integrated into museum research across time. Consequently, this paper applied a systematic quantitative approach to assess trends in research on technology and museum visitor experiences by critically examining 122 studies. Findings revealed a clear shift of the concepts studied, with early literature focused on basic concepts such as learning and interaction with technology. As the body of knowledge matured, other concepts such as intention and behaviour emerged in discourse, with contemporary literature exploring satisfaction, enjoyment, and virtual presence. Despite this, limited consistency in theories, models, and frameworks applied across time, which reflected a stagnation in stimulating critical discussions in the existing discourse. Furthermore, the forms and types of technology used in studies on museum visitor experiences have shifted from basic computer displays, through to innovative smart technology. This research provides the first attempt to holistically classify and synthesise the evolution of research on technology designed to enhance museum visitor experiences. Five types of technology in the museum sector and a Four Stage Model of Evolution consisting of (I) ICT Incubation; (II) Smart Technology Adoption; (III) ICT Transformation; and (IV) Futuristic Innovation were proposed, which demarcates the evolution of the body of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Siqi Emily Lu & Brent Moyle & Sacha Reid & Elaine Yang & Biqiang Liu, 2023. "Technology and museum visitor experiences: a four stage model of evolution," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 151-174, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40558-023-00252-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40558-023-00252-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40558-023-00252-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40558-023-00252-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yaoqi & Liu, Biqiang & Xie, Lishan, 2022. "Celebrity endorsement in international destination marketing: Evidence from eye-tracking techniques and laboratory experiments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 553-566.
    2. Elena Carvajal-Trujillo & Sebastián Molinillo & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas, 2021. "Determinants and risks of intentions to use mobile applications in museums: an application of fsQCA," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 1284-1303, May.
    3. Adrian Tanti & Dimitrios Buhalis, 2017. "The influences and consequences of being digitally connected and/or disconnected to travellers," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 121-141, March.
    4. Lamberto Zollo & Riccardo Rialti & Anna Marrucci & Cristiano Ciappei, 2022. "How do museums foster loyalty in tech-savvy visitors? The role of social media and digital experience," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(18), pages 2991-3008, September.
    5. Katerina Volchek & Anyu Liu & Haiyan Song & Dimitrios Buhalis, 2019. "Forecasting tourist arrivals at attractions: Search engine empowered methodologies," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(3), pages 425-447, May.
    6. Flavián, Carlos & Ibáñez-Sánchez, Sergio & Orús, Carlos, 2019. "The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 547-560.
    7. Yang, Elaine Chiao Ling & Khoo-Lattimore, Catheryn & Arcodia, Charles, 2017. "A systematic literature review of risk and gender research in tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 89-100.
    8. Yuwen Zhang & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2022. "Investigating the Impact of Smart Tourism Technologies on Tourists’ Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, March.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7856 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Elodie Jarrier & Dominique Bourgeon-Renault, 2012. "Impact of Mediation devices on the Museum Visit Experience and on Visitors' Behavioural Intentions," Post-Print hal-02139835, HAL.
    11. Elodie Jarrier & Dominique Bourgeon-Renault, 2012. "Impact of Mediation Devices on the Museum Visit Experience and on Visitors' Behavioural Intentions," Post-Print halshs-01288238, HAL.
    12. Jessie Pallud & Emmanuel Monod, 2010. "User experience of museum technologies: the phenomenological scales," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 562-580, October.
    13. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    14. Ryan Yung & Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore, 2019. "New realities: a systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(17), pages 2056-2081, October.
    15. Jessie Pallud & Emmanuel Monod, 2010. "User experience of museum technologies: the phenomenological scales," Post-Print halshs-00666659, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyeon Jo, 2023. "Tourism in the digital frontier: a study on user continuance intention in the metaverse," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 307-330, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Izzo, Filomena & Camminatiello, Ida & Sasso, Pasquale & Solima, Ludovico & Lombardo, Rosaria, 2023. "Creating customer, museum and social value through digital technologies: Evidence from the MANN Assiri project," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Juliette Passebois- Ducrot & Florence Euzéby & Sarah Machat & Jeanne Lallement, 2015. "La gamification des dispositifs de médiation culturelle : Quelle perception et quel impact sur l’expérience de visite ? Le cas de la corderie Royale," Post-Print hal-01675348, HAL.
    3. Francisco Javier Lacarcel & Raquel Huete, 2023. "Digital communication strategies used by private companies, entrepreneurs, and public entities to attract long-stay tourists: a review," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 691-708, June.
    4. Zain ul Abedin Janjua & Gengeswari Krishnapillai & Mobashar Rahman, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Rural Homestays and Sustainability in Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    5. Wajeana WHITE & Albert A. BARREDA & Stephanie HEIN, 2019. "Gastrodiplomacy: Captivating a Global Audience Through Cultural Cuisine-A Systematic Review of the Literature," Journal of Tourismology, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 127-144, December.
    6. Huixian Shen & Ivan Ka Wai Lai, 2022. "Souvenirs: A Systematic Literature Review (1981–2020) and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    7. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia & Yang, Jialei, 2022. "Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    8. Marta de Miguel de Blas & Dominique Bourgeon-Renault & Elodie Jarrier, 2015. "Can Interactive Mediation Tools Bridge the Identity Gap Between the Public and the Art Museum?," Post-Print hal-02139827, HAL.
    9. Sujin Bae & Timothy Hyungsoo Jung & Natasha Moorhouse & Minjeong Suh & Ohbyung Kwon, 2020. "The Influence of Mixed Reality on Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty in Cultural Heritage Attractions: A Brand Equity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Hart, Timothy C. & Chataway, Michael & Mellberg, Jacques, 2022. "Measuring fear of crime during the past 25 years: A systematic quantitative literature review," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Andreea STRÂMBU-DIMA, 2021. "A Model Of Marketing Product In Religious Heritage Sites: Case Study For The Monastery Of Hodos-Bodrog," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(23), pages 1-10.
    12. Fabrizio Mosca & Bernardo Bertoldi & Chiara Giachino & Margherita Stupino, 2018. "Facebook and Twitter, social networks for culture. An investigation on museums," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 39-59.
    13. Ana Slavec & Nežka Sajinčič & Vesna Starman, 2021. "Use of Smartphone Cameras and Other Applications While Traveling to Sustain Outdoor Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Sadamali Jayawardena, Nirma & Thaichon, Park & Quach, Sara & Razzaq, Ali & Behl, Abhishek, 2023. "‘The persuasion effects of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) video advertisements: A conceptual review’," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    16. Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Construction and Validation of a Sustainable Tourism Development Evaluation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    18. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    20. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:25:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40558-023-00252-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.