IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/humman/v9y2024i1d10.1007_s41463-024-00169-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traveling and Inclusion: A Stakeholder Approach to Tourism Experiences for Families with Children with Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Flor Morton

    (Universidad de Monterrey)

  • Mario Vázquez-Maguirre

    (Universidad de Monterrey)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to propose a framework to remedy potential dignity violations to families with children with disabilities seeking tourism experiences. We build on a systematic literature review on the topic of tourism of families with children with disabilities to propose a conceptual framework of dignity protection for this segment. This framework analyzes the responsibilities of four stakeholders (service providers, government, other tourists, and families) classified into dignity thresholds, to reduce attitudinal, information, and infrastructure barriers faced by children with disabilities and their families when traveling. This paper is one of the few studies that connects the concept of dignity to the family tourism literature (with a special focus on a type of family variation neglected in terms of adequate tourism experiences) through a stakeholder approach focusing on the collaboration among actors within the industry to advance the creation of suitable tourism experiences for families with children with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Flor Morton & Mario Vázquez-Maguirre, 2024. "Traveling and Inclusion: A Stakeholder Approach to Tourism Experiences for Families with Children with Disabilities," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 121-144, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:humman:v:9:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41463-024-00169-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s41463-024-00169-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41463-024-00169-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41463-024-00169-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Pirson & Lerzan Aksoy & Sertan Kabadayi, 2019. "Social Innovation and the Future of Business and Business Education," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 119-124, December.
    2. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    3. Sen, Amartya, 2001. "Development as Freedom," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192893307, Decembrie.
    4. Dunham, Laura & Freeman, R. Edward & Liedtka, Jeanne, 2006. "Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 23-42, January.
    5. Sergiy D. Dmytriyev & R. Edward Freeman & Jacob Hörisch, 2021. "The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1441-1470, September.
    6. Amber M. Epp & Linda L. Price, 2008. "Family Identity: A Framework of Identity Interplay in Consumption Practices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(1), pages 50-70, February.
    7. André Laplume & Kent Walker & Zhou Zhang & Xin Yu, 2021. "Incumbent Stakeholder Management Performance and New Entry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 629-644, December.
    8. Michael Pirson, 2019. "A Humanistic Perspective for Management Theory: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 39-57, September.
    9. Chris Laszlo, 2019. "Strengthening Humanistic Management," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 85-94, July.
    10. Joan Fontrodona & Domènec Melé, 2022. "Thinking About the Future of work: Promoting Dignity and Human Flourishing," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 181-188, October.
    11. Alina Simona Tecău & Gabriel Brătucu & Bianca Tescașiu & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Cristinel Petrișor Constantin & Diana Foris, 2019. "Responsible Tourism—Integrating Families with Disabled Children in Tourist Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    13. Kim, Songee & Lehto, Xinran Y., 2013. "Travel by families with children possessing disabilities: Motives and activities," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 13-24.
    14. Michael Pirson & Mario Vázquez-Maguirre & Canan Corus & Erica Steckler & Andrew Wicks, 2019. "Dignity and the Process of Social Innovation: Lessons from Social Entrepreneurship and Transformative Services for Humanistic Management," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 125-153, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coralie Fiori-Khayat, 2023. "In Search of Regained Time? Autism and Organizational [A]temporality in the Light of Humanistic Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 665-679, December.
    2. Selene Islas-Calderón & Mario Vázquez-Maguirre, 2024. "Dignity, Humanistic Management, and the Process of Social Innovation," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 313-326, December.
    3. Deepa Sharma & Suman Chakraborty & Ashwath Ananda Rao & Lumen Shawn Lobo, 2023. "The Relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: A Bibliometric Overview," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    4. John Hasnas, 2013. "Whither Stakeholder Theory? A Guide for the Perplexed Revisited," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 47-57, January.
    5. Vianney Domingo & Domènec Melé, 2022. "Re-Thinking Management: Insights from Western Classical Humanism," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Jacqueline Tilton & Kristen Lucas & Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart & Justin K. Kent, 2024. "Enduring, Strategizing, and Rising Above: Workplace Dignity Threats and Responses Across Job Levels," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 353-374, November.
    7. Mario Vázquez-Maguirre, 2020. "Building Sustainable Rural Communities through Indigenous Social Enterprises: A Humanistic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Kathryn Goldman Schuyler & Lemuel Warren Watson & Elizabeth King, 2021. "How Generative Mindfulness Can Contribute to Inclusive Workplaces," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 451-478, December.
    9. Bressan, Alessandro & Duarte Alonso, Abel & Thi Kim Vu, Oanh, 2023. "Business-community relations under COVID-19: A study of micro and small firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    10. Sabrina Celestino & Antonella Garofano & Barbara Masiello & Francesco Izzo & Enrico Bonetti, 2024. "Disability and marketing: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2024(3), pages 311-337, September.
    11. Jose Luis Retolaza & Ricardo Aguado & Leire Alcaniz, 2019. "Stakeholder Theory Through the Lenses of Catholic Social Thought," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 969-980, July.
    12. Tommy Jensen & Johan Sandström, 2013. "In Defence of Stakeholder Pragmatism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 225-237, May.
    13. Julia Roloff, 2008. "Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 233-250, September.
    14. Ishrat Ali & Griffin W. Cottle, 2021. "Reconceptualizing Entrepreneurial Performance: The Creation and Destruction of Value from a Stakeholder Capabilities Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 781-796, May.
    15. Carri Reisdorf Tolmie & Kevin Lehnert & Hongxin Zhao, 2020. "Formal and informal institutional pressures on corporate social responsibility: A cross‐country analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 786-802, March.
    16. Katarzyna Woźniak-Jasinska & Wlodzimierz Lewoniewski, 2025. "Analyzing Labor Market Dynamics in Industry 4.0: An Economic and Sociological Bibliometric Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 761-782.
    17. Sedgley, Diane & Pritchard, Annette & Morgan, Nigel & Hanna, Paul, 2017. "Tourism and autism: Journeys of mixed emotions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 14-25.
    18. Jan Wiers & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship research 2009–2019," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 441-464, December.
    19. Tendai Zawaira & Matthew W. Clance & Carolyn Chisadza, 2020. "Social Institutions and Gender-Biased Outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa," Working Papers 2020101, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    20. repec:oup:jecgeo:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:282-302. is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Ana Filipa Fonseca & Fabíola Polita & Lívia Madureira, 2024. "How Agroecological Transition Frameworks Are Reshaping Agroecology: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:humman:v:9:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s41463-024-00169-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.