IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v8y1999i5d10.1023_a1008621827601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalie J. Ocker

    (School of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University at Harrisburg)

  • Gayle J. Yaverbaum

    (School of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University at Harrisburg)

Abstract

Although there has been more than a decade of literature on computer-mediated communication in education, the research has been unclear as to whether it is an effective replacement for face-to-face (FtF) collaboration. This study sought to add to this body of research by exploring the effects of two modes of collaboration on student groups. Following a repeated-measures experimental design, each student group collaborated on two case studies, one using face-to-face collaboration and the other using asynchronous computer conferencing technology as a means of collaboration. Empirical findings indicate that asynchronous collaboration is as effective as face-to-face collaboration in terms of learning, quality of solution, solution content, and satisfaction with the solution quality. However, students were significantly less satisfied with the asynchronous learning experience, both in terms of the group interaction process and the quality of group discussions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalie J. Ocker & Gayle J. Yaverbaum, 1999. "Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication versus Face-to-face Collaboration: Results on Student Learning, Quality and Satisfaction," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 427-440, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:8:y:1999:i:5:d:10.1023_a:1008621827601
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1008621827601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1008621827601
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1008621827601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raquel Benbunan-Fich & Starr Roxanne Hiltz, 1999. "Impacts of Asynchronous Learning Networks on Individual and Group Problem Solving: A Field Experiment," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 409-426, September.
    2. Dorothy E. Leidner & Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, 1993. "The Information Age Confronts Education: Case Studies on Electronic Classrooms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 24-54, March.
    3. Michael H. Zack, 1993. "Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 207-239, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingmar Geiger, 2014. "Media Effects on the Formation of Negotiator Satisfaction: The Example of Face-to-Face and Text Based Electronically Mediated Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 735-763, July.
    2. Kennedy, Deanna M. & Sommer, S. Amy & Nguyen, Phuong Anh, 2017. "Optimizing multi-team system behaviors: Insights from modeling team communication," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 264-278.
    3. Baltes, Boris B. & Dickson, Marcus W. & Sherman, Michael P. & Bauer, Cara C. & LaGanke, Jacqueline S., 2002. "Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 156-179, January.
    4. Bruce A. Reinig & Ira Horowitz & G. E. Whittenburg, 2011. "A Longitudinal Analysis of Satisfaction with Group Work," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 215-237, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jim Sheffield, 2004. "The Design of GSS-Enabled Interventions: A Habermasian Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 415-435, September.
    2. Mark A. Rodriguez, 2014. "Content Analysis as a Method to Assess Online Discussions for Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    3. Maryam Alavi & Dorothy E. Leidner, 2001. "Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning—A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Martha L. Maznevski & Katherine M. Chudoba, 2000. "Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 473-492, October.
    5. Hoegl, Martin & Proserpio, Luigi, 2004. "Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1153-1165, October.
    6. Mohamed Khalifa & RonChi-Wai Kwok & Robert Davison, 2002. "The Effects of Process and Content Facilitation Restrictiveness on GSS-Mediated Collaborative Learning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 345-361, September.
    7. Stephanie Watts Sussman & Wendy Schneier Siegal, 2003. "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 47-65, March.
    8. Rashmi Nakra, 2006. "Relationship between Communication Satisfaction and Organizational Identification: An Empirical Study," Vision, , vol. 10(2), pages 41-51, April.
    9. Chelley Vician & Gerardine DeSanctis, 2000. "The Impact of Role Training in a User-Driven Group Support System Environment," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 275-296, July.
    10. Yoo, Weon-Sang & Lee, Yunjung & Park, JungKun, 2010. "The role of interactivity in e-tailing: Creating value and increasing satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 89-96.
    11. Bernard Fallery & Florence Rodhain, 2011. "Three Epistemological Foundations for e-Learning Models," Post-Print hal-00777835, HAL.
    12. Richard P. Bagozzi & Utpal M. Dholakia, 2006. "Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1099-1115, July.
    13. Wee-Kek Tan & Chuan-Hoo Tan & Hock-Hai Teo, 2012. "Conveying information effectively in a virtual world: Insights from synthesized task closure and media richness," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1198-1212, June.
    14. Dongwook Kim & Sungbum Kim, 2017. "Sustainable Supply Chain Based on News Articles and Sustainability Reports: Text Mining with Leximancer and DICTION," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-44, June.
    15. Ágnes Szukits, 2022. "The illusion of data-driven decision making – The mediating effect of digital orientation and controllers’ added value in explaining organizational implications of advanced analytics," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 403-446, September.
    16. Andersson, Krister P., 2004. "Who Talks with Whom? The Role of Repeated Interactions in Decentralized Forest Governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 233-249, February.
    17. Álvaro Rocha & Maria José Angélico Gonçalves & Amélia Ferreira Silva & Sandrina Teixeira & Rui Silva, 2022. "Leadership challenges in the context of university 4.0. A thematic synthesis literature review," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 214-246, September.
    18. Gerardine DeSanctis & Peter Monge, 1999. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(6), pages 693-703, December.
    19. Michael Boyer O'Leary & Mark Mortensen, 2010. "Go (Con)figure: Subgroups, Imbalance, and Isolates in Geographically Dispersed Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 115-131, February.
    20. Urban Nulden, 1999. "Thematic Modules in an Asynchronous Learning Network: A Scandinavian Perspective on the Design of Introductory Courses," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 8(5), pages 391-408, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:8:y:1999:i:5:d:10.1023_a:1008621827601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.