IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v33y2024i6d10.1007_s10726-024-09902-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GAN-Based Privacy-Preserving Intelligent Medical Consultation Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Yicheng Gong

    (Wuhan University of Science and Technology
    Wuhan University of Science and Technology)

  • Wenlong Wu

    (Wuhan University of Science and Technology)

  • Linlin Song

    (Wuhan University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

In the era of big data, information leakage during medical consultation has become a crucial factor in patients’ decision-making. This paper presents an intelligent medical decision model that considers patient privacy. The model utilizes data synthesized through a generative adversarial network (GAN) for intelligent training, ensuring privacy protection. First, we formulate a risk-based decision model for three different alternative medical consultation modes, analyzing decision rules related to visiting distance and disease probability. Next, we construct a data-driven intelligent medical decision framework. To address privacy concerns, we employ GAN to generate synthetic data from historical patient records, which is seamlessly incorporated into the decision framework to derive decision rules. Finally, specific patient data is utilized to make informed medical decisions. We validated our model using the random forest algorithm and liver disease patients’ medical decisions. Empirical findings demonstrate that the GAN-based synthetic data improves the nearest-neighbor distance ratio by 12.4% compared to synthetic data with Gaussian noise, thereby enhancing data privacy. Additionally, the GAN-based prediction models outperform the models trained on real data, achieving a notable increase of 6.3% and 4.1% in average accuracy and F1 score, respectively. Notably, the GAN-based intelligent decision-making models surpass four other baseline medical visit decision-making methods with an impressive accuracy of 74.0%. In conclusion, our proposed intelligent medical decision-making model effectively prioritizes user data privacy while enhancing the quality of medical decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Yicheng Gong & Wenlong Wu & Linlin Song, 2024. "GAN-Based Privacy-Preserving Intelligent Medical Consultation Decision-Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1495-1522, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-024-09902-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-024-09902-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-024-09902-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-024-09902-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven C. Salop, 1979. "Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 141-156, Spring.
    2. Rita Santos & Hugh Gravelle & Carol Propper, 2017. "Does Quality Affect Patients’ Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(600), pages 445-494, March.
    3. Rita Santos & Hugh Gravelle & Carol Propper, 2017. "Does Quality Affect Patients’ Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(600), pages 445-494, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Avdic & Tugba Bueyuekdurmus & Giuseppe Moscelli & Adam Pilny & Ieva Sriubaite, 2018. "Subjective and objective quality reporting and choice of hospital: Evidence from maternal care services in Germany," CINCH Working Paper Series 1803, Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Competent in Competition and Health.
    2. Alice M. Ellyson & Anirban Basu, 2018. "The New Prescription Drug Paradox: Pipeline Pressure and Rising Prices," NBER Working Papers 24387, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Bensnes, Simon & Huitfeldt, Ingrid, 2021. "Rumor has it: How do patients respond to patient-generated physician ratings?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Anell, Anders & Dietrichson, Jens & Ellegård, Lina Maria & Kjellsson, Gustav, 2021. "Information, switching costs, and consumer choice: Evidence from two randomised field experiments in Swedish primary health care," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Godager , Geir & Scott, Anthony, 2023. "Physician Behavior and Health Outcomes," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2023:3, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme.
    6. Brüll, Eduard & Rostam-Afschar, Davud & Schlenker, Oliver, 2024. "Cut off from new competition: Threat of entry and health care quality," Working Papers 41, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    7. Soroush Saghafian & Wallace J. Hopp, 2020. "Can Public Reporting Cure Healthcare? The Role of Quality Transparency in Improving Patient–Provider Alignment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 71-92, January.
    8. Ginja, Rita & Riise, Julie & Willage, Barton & Willén, Alexander, 2025. "Does Your Doctor Matter?," IZA Discussion Papers 17726, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Christopher J. Cronin & David K. Guilkey & Ilene S. Speizer, 2019. "Measurement error in discrete health facility choice models: An example from urban Senegal," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(7), pages 1102-1120, November.
    10. Brüll, Eduard & Rostam-Afschar, Davud & Schlenker, Oliver, 2024. "Cut off from new competition: Threat of entry and health care quality," Working Papers 41, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    11. Daniel Herrera-Araujo & Lise Rochaix, 2020. "Competition between Public and Private Maternity Care Providers in France: Evidence on Market Segmentation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Gravelle, Hugh & Liu, Dan & Santos, Rita, 2022. "How do clinical quality and patient satisfaction vary with provider size in primary care? Evidence from English general practice panel data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    13. Brekke, Kurt R. & Holmås, Tor Helge & Monstad, Karin & Straume, Odd Rune, 2019. "Competition and physician behaviour: Does the competitive environment affect the propensity to issue sickness certificates?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 117-135.
    14. Soheil Davari, 2019. "The incremental cooperative design of preventive healthcare networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 445-492, January.
    15. Lina Maria Ellegård & Jens Dietrichson & Anders Anell, 2018. "Can pay‐for‐performance to primary care providers stimulate appropriate use of antibiotics?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 39-54, January.
    16. Saghafian, Soroush & Hopp, Wallace J., 2017. "Can Public Reporting Cure Healthcare? The Role of Quality Transparency in Improving Patient-Provider Alignment," Working Paper Series rwp17-044, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    17. Gravelle, Hugh & Liu, Dan & Propper, Carol & Santos, Rita, 2019. "Spatial competition and quality: Evidence from the English family doctor market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    18. Paul Allanson & Richard Cookson, 2022. "Comparing healthcare quality: A common framework for both ordinal and cardinal data with an application to primary care variation in England," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(12), pages 2593-2608, December.
    19. Brüll, Eduard & Rostam-Afschar, Davud & Schlenker, Oliver, 2025. "Cut off from new competition: Threat of entry and quality of primary care," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Kai Shen Lim & Wei Aun Yap & Winnie Yip, 2022. "Consumer choice and public‐private providers: The role of perceived prices," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(9), pages 1898-1925, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10726-024-09902-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.