IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/futbus/v11y2025i1d10.1186_s43093-025-00428-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge management enablers and innovative capabilities: the mediating role of knowledge transfer—insights from telecom industry in Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Marwa Mohamed Abdel Hameed

    (Cairo University)

  • Abd Elazez Abd Eltawab Hashem

    (Cairo University)

  • Tarek Mohamed Ali

    (Sohag University
    The British University in Egypt)

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the mediating role of knowledge transfer (KT) in explaining the interdependencies between Knowledge Management Enablers (KMEs) and Innovation Capabilities (ICs) within Egypt’s Telecom industry. Design/methodology/approach Using a cross-sectional survey, the authors collected data from 315 employees working at the leading four Telecom Companies in Egypt. The hypothesized model was analyzed using the partial least square structural equation modeling technique. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 key positions and mirrored against the quantitative data. The qualitative data were analyzed using the thematic analysis technique. Findings The results indicate a significant positive effect of the KM enablers of T-shaped skills and leadership-style on workers’ ICs. The KMEs dimensions of organization culture, structure, IT-Support-T-shaped skills and leadership-style explain the KT mechanism. The relationship between the KM enablers of (organization culture, structure, IT-Support, and leadership-style) and workers’ ICs is mediated by the KT mechanism. The relationship between T-shaped skills and ICs is not mediated by KT. Research limitations/implications Limited attention, until now, is given to the KMEs, KT and ICs interdependencies. This study bridges this research gap by exploring how KM enablers (i.e., organization culture, organization structure, IT infrastructure, T-shape skills, and leadership-style) shape the mechanism of transferring knowledge within the organization, which generates ICs for organizations operating in dynamic environment. Practical implications The results provide managers with applicable recommendations for fostering KMEs, encouraging KT mechanisms, and enhancing workers’ ICs. Originality/value This research is among the first to significantly contribute to understanding how KT mechanism, as mediator, explain the interdependencies between KMEs and ICs in ever-changing business environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Marwa Mohamed Abdel Hameed & Abd Elazez Abd Eltawab Hashem & Tarek Mohamed Ali, 2025. "Knowledge management enablers and innovative capabilities: the mediating role of knowledge transfer—insights from telecom industry in Egypt," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:futbus:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-025-00428-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s43093-025-00428-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s43093-025-00428-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s43093-025-00428-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders Haug & Kent Adsbøll Wickstrøm & Jan Stentoft & Kristian Philipsen, 2023. "The impact of information technology on product innovation in SMEs: The role of technological orientation," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 384-410, March.
    2. Maneejuk, Paravee & Yamaka, Woraphon, 2020. "An analysis of the impacts of telecommunications technology and innovation on economic growth," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10).
    3. Thang Nguyen & Anh Phan & Mai Nguyen, 2016. "Knowledge Creation, Innovation and Financial Performance of Firms: Evidence from Vietnam," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 1-95, May.
    4. Kong YuSheng & Masud Ibrahim, 2020. "Innovation Capabilities, Innovation Types, and Firm Performance: Evidence From the Banking Sector of Ghana," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    5. Leng Yi & Fukuda Hiroatsu, 2022. "Incentives for Innovation in Robotics and Automated Construction: Based on a Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Laith Ali Al-Hakim & Shahizan Hassan, 2016. "Core requirements of knowledge management implementation, innovation and organizational performance," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 109-124, February.
    7. Lijie Feng & Zhenzhen Zhao & Jinfeng Wang & Ke Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Knowledge Management Capabilities on Innovation Performance from Dynamic Capabilities Perspective: Moderating the Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Sergi Fàbregues & Quan Nha Hong & Elsa Lucia Escalante-Barrios & Timothy C. Guetterman & Julio Meneses & Michael D. Fetters, 2020. "A Methodological Review of Mixed Methods Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (2014–2019)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Samuel Godadaw Ayinaddis, 2023. "The Relationship Between Service Innovation, Customer Satisfaction, and Loyalty Intention in Emerging Economies: An Evidence from Ethio Telecom," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4045-4063, December.
    10. Frank Bezzina & David Baldacchino & Vincent Cassar, 2020. "Relating Knowledge Management Enablers, Knowledge Management Processes, and Organizational Effectiveness: The Case for the Maltese Pharmaceutical Sector," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 16(4), pages 109-124, October.
    11. Changiz Valmohammadi & Javad Sofiyabadi & Bahare Kolahi, 2019. "How do Knowledge Management Practices Affect Sustainable Balanced Performance? Mediating Role of Innovation Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Gabriel Szulanski & Rossella Cappetta & Robert J. Jensen, 2004. "When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 600-613, October.
    13. Yan, Xu & Huang, Minyi, 2022. "Leveraging university research within the context of open innovation: The case of Huawei," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Liu & Lin Zhang & Abhinav Gupta & Xiaoming Zheng & Changqi Wu, 2022. "Upper echelons and intra‐organizational learning: How executive narcissism affects knowledge transfer among business units," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2351-2381, November.
    2. Ghadah Lafi Alharbi & Monira Essa Aloud, 2024. "The effects of knowledge management processes on service sector performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. C. Lakshman & Sangeetha Lakshman & Kubilay Gok, 2023. "Managers’ knowledge and customer-focused knowledge management as dynamic capabilities: implications for innovation performance," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 246-274, February.
    4. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    5. López-Sáez, Pedro & Cruz-González, Jorge & Navas-López, Jose Emilio & Perona-Alfageme, María del Mar, 2021. "Organizational integration mechanisms and knowledge transfer effectiveness in MNCs: The moderating role of cross-national distance," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4).
    6. Hyeon Gyu Jeon & Kun Chang Lee, 2020. "Emotional Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Intentions in the Context of Competitive Knowledge Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Martin M�ller & Allison Stewart, 2016. "Does Temporary Geographical Proximity Predict Learning? Knowledge Dynamics in the Olympic Games," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 377-390, March.
    8. Raj Kumar Shukla & Dr. Sanjay R. Mali, 2015. "Planning Skills for Solar Supply Chain Management," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 6(3), pages 53-57, September.
    9. Charles Shaaba Saba & Nicholas Ngepah, 2022. "ICT Diffusion, Industrialisation and Economic Growth Nexus: an International Cross-country Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2030-2069, September.
    10. Fabian Jintae Froese & Sebastian Stoermer & B Sebastian Reiche & Sebastian Klar, 2021. "Best of both worlds: How embeddedness fit in the host unit and the headquarters improve repatriate knowledge transfer," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(7), pages 1331-1349, September.
    11. Burmeister, Anne & Lazarova, Mila B. & Deller, Jürgen, 2018. "Repatriate knowledge transfer: Antecedents and boundary conditions of a dyadic process," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 806-816.
    12. Pérez-Nordtvedt, Liliana & Babakus, Emin & Kedia, Ben L., 2010. "Learning from international business affiliates: developing resource-based learning capacity through networks and knowledge acquisition," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 262-274, September.
    13. Kwangsu Cho & Sehee Han & Ting-Ting Rachel Chung & Patrick J. Bateman, 2017. "The Influence of an Integrated View of Source’s Expertise on Knowledge Transfer," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Michailova, Snejina & Mustaffa, Zaidah, 2012. "Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 383-396.
    15. Yan Tian & Yuan Li & Zelong Wei, 2013. "Managerial Incentive and External Knowledge Acquisition Under Technological Uncertainty: A Nested System Perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 214-228, May.
    16. Zhen Zhang, 2024. "Exploring the green edge: the role of market orientation and knowledge management in achieving competitive advantage through creativity," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Namal Mete Kaan & Tufan Cenk & Köksal Kemal & Mert İbrahim Sani, 2023. "The Effect of Market and Technological Turbulence on Innovation Performance in Nascent Enterprises: The Moderating Role of Entrepreneur’s Courage," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19.
    18. Omrane, Amina, 2022. "The main determinants and effects of product innovation: An exploratory study on the pastry companies of the region of Sfax (in Tunisia)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    19. Oliver Schilke & Karen S. Cook, 2015. "Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-297, February.
    20. Laura Poppo, 2010. "Strategy and Transaction Costs," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 21, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:futbus:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-025-00428-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.