IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v17y2013i1p135-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The optimal-drift model: an accelerated binomial scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Ralf Korn
  • Stefanie Müller

Abstract

We introduce the optimal-drift model for the approximation of a lognormal stock price process by an accelerated binomial scheme. This model converges with order o(1/N), which is superior compared to today’s benchmark methods. Our approach is based on the observation that risk-neutral binomial schemes converge to the lognormal limit independently of the choice of the drift parameter. We verify the improved order of convergence by an asymptotic expansion of the binomial distribution function. Further, we show that the above result on drift invariance implies weak convergence of the binomial schemes suggested by Tian (in J. Futures Mark. 19, 817–843, 1999 ) and Chang and Palmer (in Finance Stoch. 11, 91–105, 2007 ). Copyright Springer-Verlag 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Ralf Korn & Stefanie Müller, 2013. "The optimal-drift model: an accelerated binomial scheme," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 135-160, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:17:y:2013:i:1:p:135-160
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-012-0179-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00780-012-0179-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-012-0179-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leisen, Dietmar P. J., 1998. "Pricing the American put option: A detailed convergence analysis for binomial models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 22(8-9), pages 1419-1444, August.
    2. Kaushik Amin & Ajay Khanna, 1994. "Convergence Of American Option Values From Discrete‐ To Continuous‐Time Financial Models1," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(4), pages 289-304, October.
    3. Lo-Bin Chang & Ken Palmer, 2007. "Smooth convergence in the binomial model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 91-105, January.
    4. Francine Diener & MARC Diener, 2004. "Asymptotics of the price oscillations of a European call option in a tree model," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 271-293, April.
    5. Dietmar Leisen & Matthias Reimer, 1996. "Binomial models for option valuation - examining and improving convergence," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 319-346.
    6. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Leduc & Merima Nurkanovic Hot, 2020. "Joshi’s Split Tree for Option Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Alona Bock & Ralf Korn, 2016. "Improving Convergence of Binomial Schemes and the Edgeworth Expansion," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Jean-Christophe Breton & Youssef El-Khatib & Jun Fan & Nicolas Privault, 2021. "A q-binomial extension of the CRR asset pricing model," Papers 2104.10163, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. San-Lin Chung & Pai-Ta Shih, 2007. "Generalized Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Binomial Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 508-520, March.
    2. Jean-Christophe Breton & Youssef El-Khatib & Jun Fan & Nicolas Privault, 2021. "A q-binomial extension of the CRR asset pricing model," Papers 2104.10163, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    3. Mark Joshi & Mike Staunton, 2012. "On the analytical/numerical pricing of American put options against binomial tree prices," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 17-20, December.
    4. Alona Bock & Ralf Korn, 2016. "Improving Convergence of Binomial Schemes and the Edgeworth Expansion," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Guillaume Leduc & Merima Nurkanovic Hot, 2020. "Joshi’s Split Tree for Option Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Mark Joshi, 2009. "Achieving smooth asymptotics for the prices of European options in binomial trees," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 171-176.
    7. Qianru Shang & Brian Byrne, 2021. "American option pricing: Optimal Lattice models and multidimensional efficiency tests," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 514-535, April.
    8. David Heath & Stefano Herzel, 2002. "Efficient option valuation using trees," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 163-178.
    9. Leisen, Dietmar P. J., 1999. "The random-time binomial model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1355-1386, September.
    10. Arturo Leccadito & Pietro Toscano & Radu S. Tunaru, 2012. "Hermite Binomial Trees: A Novel Technique For Derivatives Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(08), pages 1-36.
    11. Elisa Appolloni & Andrea Ligori, 2014. "Efficient tree methods for pricing digital barrier options," Papers 1401.2900, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2014.
    12. Nagae, Takeshi & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2008. "A generalized complementarity approach to solving real option problems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1754-1779, June.
    13. Dietmar P.J. Leisen, 1997. "The Random-Time Binomial Model," Finance 9711005, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 Nov 1998.
    14. Pier Giuseppe Giribone & Simone Ligato, 2016. "Flexible-forward pricing through Leisen–Reimer trees: Implementation and performance comparison with traditional Markov chains," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Karl Grosse-Erdmann & Fabien Heuwelyckx, 2015. "The pricing of lookback options and binomial approximation," Papers 1502.02819, arXiv.org.
    16. Gongqiu Zhang & Lingfei Li, 2019. "Analysis of Markov Chain Approximation for Option Pricing and Hedging: Grid Design and Convergence Behavior," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 407-427, March.
    17. Ghafarian, Bahareh & Hanafizadeh, Payam & Qahi, Amir Hossein Mortazavi, 2018. "Applying Greek letters to robust option price modeling by binomial-tree," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 632-639.
    18. Karl Grosse-Erdmann & Fabien Heuwelyckx, 2016. "The pricing of lookback options and binomial approximation," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 39(1), pages 33-67, April.
    19. Andrea Gamba & Lenos Trigeorgis, 2007. "An Improved Binomial Lattice Method for Multi-Dimensional Options," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 453-475.
    20. Kyoung-Sook Moon & Hongjoong Kim, 2013. "A multi-dimensional local average lattice method for multi-asset models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 873-884, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Binomial model; Black–Scholes model; Option pricing; Accelerated convergence; Weak convergence; 91G20; 91G60; G13;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:17:y:2013:i:1:p:135-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.