IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v44y2024i3d10.1007_s10669-023-09954-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urbanization and social capital networks among regions for natural disaster resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Kiyomi Kawamoto

    (Toyo University)

  • Eric Y. Yamashita

    (University of Hawaii)

Abstract

This study describes the network flow of social capital (SC) among regions for natural disaster resilience from the perspective of urbanization. Assistance between residents is a significant factor during natural disasters, and these ties are called SC. On the other hand, the relationship between residents in metropolitan areas is changing, and many urban residents do not interact closely with each other. This trend is accelerating with urbanization. Therefore, the networks beyond the community are essential during the disaster period. Two metropolitan areas, each with six districts, were chosen for this study. Honolulu County, Hawaii, in the U.S., is in the suburbanization stage, and Aichi prefecture, Japan, is in the reurbanization stage. SC data were collected by conducting a web-based survey, and the total number of valid samples was 1324. The quality of SC networks was analyzed compared with six types of SC, and the structure between districts was examined by the maximum flow. As a result, the SC network flow in high-population growth districts had the highest value; therefore, the high-population growth area can be the most SC exchangeable area. The mutual assistance networks, shaped by trust, empowerment, and cooperation, are strong even if urbanization progresses. On the other hand, personal relationship networks, such as safety confirmation, information exchange, and ethnically diverse acquaintances, become the weaker linkage in the transition from suburbanization to reurbanization. Finally, the use of SC networks for natural disaster resilience actions was discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiyomi Kawamoto & Eric Y. Yamashita, 2024. "Urbanization and social capital networks among regions for natural disaster resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 514-526, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:44:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09954-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-023-09954-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-023-09954-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-023-09954-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorit S. Hochbaum, 2008. "The Pseudoflow Algorithm: A New Algorithm for the Maximum-Flow Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 992-1009, August.
    2. Brenda Murphy, 2007. "Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 41(2), pages 297-315, May.
    3. Thomas Kontuly & Brad Dearden, 2003. "Testing the temporal characterisation of the differential urbanisation model in western Germany, 1939–2010," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 94(1), pages 64-74, February.
    4. Grootaert Grootaert & Deepa Narayan & Veronica Nyhan Jones & Michael Woolcock, 2004. "Measuring Social Capital : An Integrated Questionnaire," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15033, April.
    5. Douglas Altner & Özlem Ergun, 2011. "Rapidly computing robust minimum capacity s-t cuts: a case study in solving a sequence of maximum flow problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 3-26, April.
    6. Tiezhong Liu & Huyuan Zhang & Hubo Zhang, 2020. "The Influence of Social Capital on Protective Action Perceptions Towards Hazardous Chemicals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    7. John Östh & Martina Dolciotti & Aura Reggiani & Peter Nijkamp, 2018. "Social Capital, Resilience and Accessibility in Urban Systems: a Study on Sweden," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 313-336, June.
    8. Michael K. Lindell & Ronald W. Perry, 2012. "The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 616-632, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeng, Jing & Duan, Hongyu & Zhu, Weiwei & Song, Jingyan, 2024. "Understanding residents’ risk information seeking, processing and sharing regarding waste incineration power projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    2. Annabelle Workman & Penelope J. Jones & Amanda J. Wheeler & Sharon L. Campbell & Grant J. Williamson & Chris Lucani & David M.J.S. Bowman & Nick Cooling & Fay H. Johnston, 2021. "Environmental Hazards and Behavior Change: User Perspectives on the Usability and Effectiveness of the AirRater Smartphone App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Marcus Wiens & Miriam Klein & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "Border Region Attachment: An Empirical Study on Regional Social Capital in the French–German Border Area [Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change]," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 68(4), pages 362-390.
    5. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    6. Julija Michailova & Tadeusz Tyszka & Katarzyna Pfeifer, 2017. "Are People Interested in Probabilities of Natural Disasters?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 1005-1017, May.
    7. Xiongwei Quan & Gaoshan Zuo & Helin Sun, 2022. "Risk Perception Thresholds and Their Impact on the Behavior of Nearby Residents in Waste to Energy Project Conflict: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Amina Lamghari & Roussos Dimitrakopoulos & Jacques Ferland, 2015. "A hybrid method based on linear programming and variable neighborhood descent for scheduling production in open-pit mines," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 555-582, November.
    9. Bamieh, Omar & Cintolesi, Andrea, 2021. "Intergenerational transmission in regulated professions and the role of familism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 857-879.
    10. Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Lauren J. Vinnell & Kazuya Nakayachi & Sara K. McBride & David M. Johnston, 2020. "Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. David V. Pynadath & Bistra Dilkina & David C. Jeong & Richard S. John & Stacy C. Marsella & Chirag Merchant & Lynn C. Miller & Stephen J. Read, 2023. "Disaster world," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 84-117, March.
    12. Aparna Kumari & Tim G. Frazier, 2021. "Evaluating social capital in emergency and disaster management and hazards plans," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 949-973, October.
    13. Sabrina Cipolletta & Gabriela Rios Andreghetti & Giovanna Mioni, 2022. "Risk Perception towards COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-25, April.
    14. B. Graizbord & D. Mookherjee & H.S. Geyer, 2011. "Differential Urbanization: Linking First and Developing World Experiences," Chapters, in: H. S. Geyer (ed.), International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 3, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Sara Burcham & Wei-Wen Hsu & Sharon L. Larson & Jack Rubinstein & Susan M. Pinney, 2025. "Residential Proximity, Duration, and Health-Related Quality of Life: Insights from the Fernald Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Choi, Sunkyung & Maharjan, Rajali & Hong, Tran Thi Nhat & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2024. "Impact of information provision on tsunami evacuation behavior of residents and international tourists in Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 264-273.
    17. Laura Siebeneck & Ronald Schumann & Britt-Janet Kuenanz & Seungyoon Lee & Bailey C. Benedict & Caitlyn M. Jarvis & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2020. "Returning home after Superstorm Sandy: phases in the return-entry process," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(1), pages 195-215, March.
    18. Zhang, Shuai & Bai, Guanghan & Tao, Junyong & Wang, Yang & Xu, Bei, 2025. "An algorithm to search for multi-state minimal cuts in multi-state flow networks containing state heterogeneous components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. Yusuke Toyoda, 2021. "Survey paper: achievements and perspectives of community resilience approaches to societal systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 705-756, October.
    20. Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo & Newman, Alexandra, 2024. "A target-time-windows technique for project scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 792-806.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:44:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10669-023-09954-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.