IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i5p738-d1650773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residential Proximity, Duration, and Health-Related Quality of Life: Insights from the Fernald Cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Burcham

    (Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA)

  • Wei-Wen Hsu

    (Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA)

  • Sharon L. Larson

    (Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA)

  • Jack Rubinstein

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA)

  • Susan M. Pinney

    (Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA)

Abstract

The impact of living near environmental contamination on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is not well understood. This study examined the impacts of the residential proximity (RP) and time spent near a former Department of Energy uranium processing facility (located in Fernald, Ohio) on the surrounding community’s HRQoL outcomes. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the data collected from participants using the Short Form-36 survey at the time of the enrollment in the Fernald Medical Monitoring Program ( n = 7957). Mental and physical component summary scores (MCS and PCS, respectively) were computed for each participant. The scores were compared among the cohort participants, stratified by the RP to the facility and to the U.S. general population. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to identify associations between the RP from the facility, duration at residence, participant characteristics, and HRQoL. The adults and minors at enrollment (MAEs) living within two miles of the facility reported slightly lower MCS scores compared to those of residents who lived >2 miles from the facility, after controlling for confounding variables (adults: marginal effect (ME): −0.553, p -value: 0.002, MAEs: ME: −1.594, p -value: 0.040). The RP had a significant association with PCS scores among adults but not with the MAEs (adults: ME: −0.456, p -value: 0.010). No significant relationship was observed between the duration at residence and HRQoL. Considering the association between the RP and HRQoL in the Fernald cohort, integrating a health perception screening tool into community healthcare practices would benefit residents near environmentally contaminated sites to capture the variable nature of perceived health over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Burcham & Wei-Wen Hsu & Sharon L. Larson & Jack Rubinstein & Susan M. Pinney, 2025. "Residential Proximity, Duration, and Health-Related Quality of Life: Insights from the Fernald Cohort," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:738-:d:1650773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael K. Lindell & Timothy C. Earle, 1983. "How Close Is Close Enough: Public Perceptions of the Risks of Industrial Facilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(4), pages 245-253, December.
    2. Brender, J.D. & Maantay, J.A. & Chakraborty, J., 2011. "Residential proximity to environmental hazards and adverse health outcomes," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(SUPPL. 1), pages 37-52.
    3. Sandra Cortés & Soledad Burgos & Héctor Adaros & Boris Lucero & Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, 2021. "Environmental Health Risk Perception: Adaptation of a Population-Based Questionnaire from Latin America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Garett T. Sansom & Courtney Thompson & Lindsay Sansom & Leanne Fawkes & Elizabeth Boerlin, 2022. "Compounding impacts of hazard exposures on mental health in Houston, TX," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(3), pages 2809-2818, April.
    5. Mark Atlas, 2002. "Few and Far Between? An Environmental Equity Analysis of the Geographic Distribution of Hazardous Waste Generation," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 83(1), pages 365-378, March.
    6. Jill J. McCluskey & Gordon C. Rausser, 2001. "Estimation of Perceived Risk and Its Effect on Property Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(1), pages 42-55.
    7. Chakraborty, J. & Maantay, J.A. & Brender, J.D., 2011. "Disproportionate proximity to environmental health hazards: Methods, models, and measurement," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(SUPPL. 1), pages 27-36.
    8. Phi-Yen Nguyen & Thomas Astell-Burt & Hania Rahimi-Ardabili & Xiaoqi Feng, 2021. "Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-38, October.
    9. Eberechukwu Onukwugha & Jason Bergtold & Rahul Jain, 2015. "A Primer on Marginal Effects—Part I: Theory and Formulae," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 25-30, January.
    10. E. Onukwugha & J. Bergtold & R. Jain, 2015. "A Primer on Marginal Effects—Part II: Health Services Research Applications," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 97-103, February.
    11. Michael K. Lindell & Ronald W. Perry, 2012. "The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 616-632, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason S. Bergtold & Elizabeth A. Yeager & Allen M. Featherstone, 2018. "Inferences from logistic regression models in the presence of small samples, rare events, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity with observational data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 528-546, February.
    2. Sarah Alves & Joan Tilghman & Arlene Rosenbaum & Devon C. Payne-Sturges, 2012. "U.S. EPA Authority to Use Cumulative Risk Assessments in Environmental Decision-Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Ihnji Jon & Shih‐Kai Huang & Michael K. Lindell, 2019. "Perceptions and Expected Immediate Reactions to Severe Storm Displays," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 274-290, January.
    4. Ahluwalia, Poonam Khanijo & Nema, Arvind K., 2007. "A life cycle based multi-objective optimization model for the management of computer waste," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 792-826.
    5. Anuradhi Dulangi Jayasinghe, 2024. "A local perspective of the socio-environmental vulnerability to environmental pollution and economic crises: a case of locals around a coal power plant in Sri Lanka," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5431-5450, February.
    6. Zeng, Jing & Duan, Hongyu & Zhu, Weiwei & Song, Jingyan, 2024. "Understanding residents’ risk information seeking, processing and sharing regarding waste incineration power projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    7. Annabelle Workman & Penelope J. Jones & Amanda J. Wheeler & Sharon L. Campbell & Grant J. Williamson & Chris Lucani & David M.J.S. Bowman & Nick Cooling & Fay H. Johnston, 2021. "Environmental Hazards and Behavior Change: User Perspectives on the Usability and Effectiveness of the AirRater Smartphone App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Ling Jia & Queena K. Qian & Frits Meijer & Henk Visscher, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Risk Perception: A Perspective for Proactive Risk Management in Residential Building Energy Retrofits in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Julija Michailova & Tadeusz Tyszka & Katarzyna Pfeifer, 2017. "Are People Interested in Probabilities of Natural Disasters?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 1005-1017, May.
    10. Xiongwei Quan & Gaoshan Zuo & Helin Sun, 2022. "Risk Perception Thresholds and Their Impact on the Behavior of Nearby Residents in Waste to Energy Project Conflict: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Rui Zhou & Ying-Jing Zheng & Jing-Yi Yun & Hong-Mei Wang, 2022. "The Effects of Urban Green Space on Depressive Symptoms of Mid-Aged and Elderly Urban Residents in China: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Lauren J. Vinnell & Kazuya Nakayachi & Sara K. McBride & David M. Johnston, 2020. "Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. David V. Pynadath & Bistra Dilkina & David C. Jeong & Richard S. John & Stacy C. Marsella & Chirag Merchant & Lynn C. Miller & Stephen J. Read, 2023. "Disaster world," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 84-117, March.
    14. Sabrina Cipolletta & Gabriela Rios Andreghetti & Giovanna Mioni, 2022. "Risk Perception towards COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Huang, Ju-Chin & Haab, Timothy C. & Whitehead, John C., 2004. "Risk Valuation in the Presence of Risky Substitutes: An Application to Demand for Seafood," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(01), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Choi, Sunkyung & Maharjan, Rajali & Hong, Tran Thi Nhat & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2024. "Impact of information provision on tsunami evacuation behavior of residents and international tourists in Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 264-273.
    17. Laura Siebeneck & Ronald Schumann & Britt-Janet Kuenanz & Seungyoon Lee & Bailey C. Benedict & Caitlyn M. Jarvis & Satish V. Ukkusuri, 2020. "Returning home after Superstorm Sandy: phases in the return-entry process," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(1), pages 195-215, March.
    18. Jaloliddin Rustamov & Zahiriddin Rustamov & Nazar Zaki, 2023. "Green Space Quality Analysis Using Machine Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Guo, Yating & Rosland, Anitha & Ishak, Suryati & Muhammad Senan, Mohammad Khair Afham, 2023. "Public spending and natural resources development: A way toward green economic growth in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    20. de Koning, Koen & Filatova, Tatiana & Bin, Okmyung, 2017. "Bridging the Gap Between Revealed and Stated Preferences in Flood-prone Housing Markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-13.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:738-:d:1650773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.