IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i5d10.1007_s10668-023-04074-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing cropping pattern through reducing environmental issues and improving socio-economic indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Darzi-Naftchali

    (Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University)

  • Ali Motevali

    (Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University)

  • Ghasem Layani

    (Shahrekord University)

  • Mahdi Keikha

    (University of Zabol)

  • Mostafa Bagherian-Jelodar

    (Payame Noor University)

  • Mehdi Nadi

    (Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University)

  • Ali Asghar Firouzjaeian

    (University of Mazandaran)

  • Hemmatollah Pirdashti

    (Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University)

Abstract

A balanced relationship between the economic, social, and environmental aspects of agricultural production is required in order to maintain sustainability, given the worries about the widespread depletion of finite resources in many parts of the world. In this study, a sustainable cropping pattern (CP) was provided by developing a multi-objective function that maximizes profit while minimizing environmental problems and raising social indicators. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and an economic security index (ESI) were used, respectively, to examine the environmental impacts and economic performance of CP. Utilizing indices including social solidarity, social security, participation, and quality of life, the social consequences were assessed. A thorough questionnaire given to farmers and experts as well as government records like statistical books were used to collect the essential data. Broad beans received the least attention from farmers, and their top five priority crops were watermelon, cucumber, clover, rice, and beans, respectively. Melon, garlic, cucumber, tomato, and corn were the best crops based on all environmental parameters, whereas tobacco was the least suited. The lowest and highest ESI were associated to cotton (0.034) and cucumber (0.208). Potato, rice, cucumber, garlic, beans, and tomato profited more than $1000 per ha, while soybean, wheat, corn, barley, clover, and cotton profited less than $500 per ha. Attaining sustainable agriculture in the region requires a 15.20% reduction in cultivated area, which results in a 13.36% fall in gross profit and a 14.53% and 14.70% decrease in water and chemical fertilizer usage, respectively. By sustaining CP, the model created for this study can help decrease social conflict while generating a synergy between economic and environmental benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Darzi-Naftchali & Ali Motevali & Ghasem Layani & Mahdi Keikha & Mostafa Bagherian-Jelodar & Mehdi Nadi & Ali Asghar Firouzjaeian & Hemmatollah Pirdashti, 2024. "Optimizing cropping pattern through reducing environmental issues and improving socio-economic indicators," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 13041-13068, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04074-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04074-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04074-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04074-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darzi-Naftchali, Abdullah & Motevali, Ali & Keikha, Mahdi, 2022. "The life cycle assessment of subsurface drainage performance under rice-canola cropping system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    2. Ming Zhang & Xiaorong Zou & Long Sha, 2019. "Social Security and Sustainable Economic Growth: Based on the Perspective of Human Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Juliana Lutz & Barbara Smetschka & Nelson Grima, 2017. "Farmer Cooperation as a Means for Creating Local Food Systems—Potentials and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Acosta-Alba, Ivonne & Chia, Eduardo & Andrieu, Nadine, 2019. "The LCA4CSA framework: Using life cycle assessment to strengthen environmental sustainability analysis of climate smart agriculture options at farm and crop system levels," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 155-170.
    5. Mardani Najafabadi, Mostafa & Ziaee, Saman & Nikouei, Alireza & Ahmadpour Borazjani, Mahmoud, 2019. "Mathematical programming model (MMP) for optimization of regional cropping patterns decisions: A case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 218-232.
    6. Ashok Kumbamu, 2018. "Building sustainable social and solidarity economies: Place-based and network-based strategies of alternative development organizations in India," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 18-33, January.
    7. López-Mata, E. & Tarjuelo, J.M. & Orengo-Valverde, J.J. & Pardo, J.J. & Domínguez, A., 2019. "Irrigation scheduling to maximize crop gross margin under limited water availability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Xu, Z., 2000. "On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 683-687, November.
    9. Li, Mo & Fu, Qiang & Singh, Vijay P. & Liu, Dong & Li, Tianxiao & Zhou, Yan, 2020. "Managing agricultural water and land resources with tradeoff between economic, environmental, and social considerations: A multi-objective non-linear optimization model under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    10. Keikha, Mahdi & Darzi- Naftchali, Abdullah & Motevali, Ali & Valipour, Mohammad, 2023. "Effect of nitrogen management on the environmental and economic sustainability of wheat production in different climates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    11. Yang, Chun-Chieh & Prasher, Shiv O. & Wang, Shaoli & Kim, Seung Hyun & Tan, Chin S. & Drury, Craig & Patel, Ramanbhai M., 2007. "Simulation of nitrate-N movement in southern Ontario, Canada with DRAINMOD-N," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 299-306, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajay Singh, 2022. "Better Water and Land Allocation for Long-term Agricultural Sustainability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(10), pages 3505-3522, August.
    2. Nikouei, Alireza & Asgharipour, Mohammad Reza & Marzban, Zahra, 2022. "Modeling land allocation to produce crops under economic and environmental goals in Iran: a multi-objective programming approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 471(C).
    3. Zhang, Zepeng & Wang, Qingzheng & Guan, Qingyu & Xiao, Xiong & Mi, Jimin & Lv, Songjian, 2023. "Research on the optimal allocation of agricultural water and soil resources in the Heihe River Basin based on SWAT and intelligent optimization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    4. Matinzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Abedi Koupai, Jahangir & Sadeghi-Lari, Adnan & Nozari, Hamed & Shayannejad, Mohammad, 2017. "Development of an innovative integrated model for the simulation of nitrogen dynamics in farmlands with drainage systems using the system dynamics approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 11-28.
    5. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    6. Karner, Katrin & Schmid, Erwin & Schneider, Uwe A. & Mitter, Hermine, 2021. "Computing stochastic Pareto frontiers between economic and environmental goals for a semi-arid agricultural production region in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Urgaia R. Worku, 2022. "The Role of Endogenous Technology in Making Sustained Economic Growth in Sub‒Saharan Africa: Panel GMM and VECM Approaches," World Journal of Business and Management, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Yuxiang Ma & Min Zhou & Chaonan Ma & Mengcheng Wang & Jiating Tu, 2021. "Hybrid Economic-Environment-Ecology Land Planning Model under Uncertainty—A Case Study in Mekong Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Mi Jung Son & Jin Han Park & Ka Hyun Ko, 2019. "Some Hesitant Fuzzy Hamacher Power-Aggregation Operators for Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-33, July.
    10. Toly Chen, 2021. "A diversified AHP-tree approach for multiple-criteria supplier selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 431-453, October.
    11. Ana Esteso & M. M. E. Alemany & Angel Ortiz & Shaofeng Liu, 2022. "Optimization model to support sustainable crop planning for reducing unfairness among farmers," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 1101-1127, September.
    12. Mamata Sahu & Anjana Gupta, 2019. "Improving the consistency of incomplete hesitant multiplicative preference relation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(1), pages 324-343, March.
    13. Yue, Qiong & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Managing agricultural water-energy-food-environment nexus considering water footprint and carbon footprint under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    14. Bakhshandeh, Esmaeil & Jamali, Mohsen & Emadi, Mostafa & Francaviglia, Rosa, 2022. "Greenhouse gas emissions and financial analysis of rice paddy production scenarios in northern Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    15. Liu Fang & Peng Yanan & Zhang Weiguo & Pedrycz Witold, 2017. "On Consistency in AHP and Fuzzy AHP," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 128-147, April.
    16. Ren, Hourui & Liu, Bin & Zhang, Zirui & Li, Fuxin & Pan, Ke & Zhou, Zhongli & Xu, Xiaoshuang, 2022. "A water-energy-food-carbon nexus optimization model for sustainable agricultural development in the Yellow River Basin under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    17. Gallego, Aurea & Calafat, Consuelo & Segura, Marina & Quintanilla, Israel, 2019. "Land planning and risk assessment for livestock production based on an outranking approach and GIS," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 606-621.
    18. Zhu, Bin & Xu, Zeshui, 2014. "Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 794-801.
    19. Aull-Hyde, Rhonda & Erdogan, Sevgi & Duke, Joshua M., 2006. "An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 290-295, May.
    20. Nan-Hua Nadja Yang & Ana Carolina Bertassini & Jéssica Alves Justo Mendes & Mateus Cecílio Gerolamo, 2021. "The ‘3CE2CE’ Framework—Change Management Towards a Circular Economy: Opportunities for Agribusiness," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 697-718, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04074-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.