IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-024-00752-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public education data at the crossroads of public and private value creation: Orchestration tensions and stakeholder visions in Germany’s emerging national digital education ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Konrad Degen

    (Technical University of Berlin)

  • Rick Lutzens

    (University of Potsdam)

  • Paul Beschorner

    (University of Potsdam)

  • Ulrike Lucke

    (University of Potsdam)

Abstract

Accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, private EdTech companies and emerging digital education ecosystems have significantly reshaped digital governance in education. This shift has pressured governments into rapid digital transformation while also raising concerns about increasing inequalities, fueled by a data-driven approach to teaching and learning. The public education debate increasingly calls for tighter data regulations, alternatives to private sector dominance, and digital education offerings by traditional education actors that create value in the digital realm. Responding to these pressures, the German government develops a national digital education ecosystem (NDEE) to guide this transformation. Using data from 10 semi-structured interviews, a stakeholder survey (n = 121), and three stakeholder workshops with in total of 80 participants, our mixed-method research contributes to the discourse on digital education governance and the creation of public data ecosystems. We identify 19 orchestration tensions, aggregated into four tension groups, shed light on education stakeholders’ preferences, and identify with the three ecosystem vision models: “Education Interconnectivity Infrastructure,” “Public Education Space,” and the “Public–Private Education Marketplace.” These findings underscore the importance of a coherent ecosystem vision that balances public and private interests, leads the foundation for ecosystem governance, and aligns the ecosystem’s scope with government orchestration capabilities. We offer valuable insights for researchers and policymakers working toward a government-orchestrated national digital education ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Konrad Degen & Rick Lutzens & Paul Beschorner & Ulrike Lucke, 2025. "Public education data at the crossroads of public and private value creation: Orchestration tensions and stakeholder visions in Germany’s emerging national digital education ecosystem," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00752-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-024-00752-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-024-00752-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-024-00752-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gupta, Anushri & Panagiotopoulos, Panos & Bowen, Frances, 2020. "An orchestration approach to smart city data ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Eric K. Clemons & Maximilian Schreieck & Helmut Krcmar & Tung Bui, 2022. "Correction to: Social Welfare Computing and the management and regulation of new online business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 415-415, June.
    3. Franziska Scherenberg & Malte Hellmeier & Boris Otto, 2024. "Data Sovereignty in Information Systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170610683833 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mark Reuver & Hosea A. Ofe & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & Boriana Rukanova & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2024. "Data economy in a globalized world, opportunities and challenges for public and private organizations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-5, December.
    6. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27, Center for Open Science.
    7. Konrad Degen & Timm Teubner, 2024. "Wallet wars or digital public infrastructure? Orchestrating a digital identity data ecosystem from a government perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Frederik Möller & Ilka Jussen & Virginia Springer & Anna Gieß & Julia Christina Schweihoff & Joshua Gelhaar & Tobias Guggenberger & Boris Otto, 2024. "Industrial data ecosystems and data spaces," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. repec:osf:socarx:fbu27_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Marcel Fassnacht & Jannis Leimstoll & Carina Benz & Daniel Heinz & Gerhard Satzger, 2024. "Data sharing practices: The interplay of data, organizational structures, and network dynamics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Eric K. Clemons & Maximilian Schreieck & Helmut Krcmar & Tung Bui, 2022. "Social Welfare Computing and the management and regulation of new online business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 411-414, June.
    12. Daniel Beverungen & Thomas Hess & Antonia Köster & Christiane Lehrer, 2022. "From private digital platforms to public data spaces: implications for the digital transformation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 493-501, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konrad Degen & Alexander Gleiss, 2025. "Time to break up? The case for tailor-made digital platform regulation based on platform-governance standard types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Jana Ammann & Thomas Hess, 2025. "To sell, to donate, or to barter? Value creation and capture through business model types in decentralized data ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Hippolyte Lefebvre & Pavel Krasikov & Christine Legner & Gabin Flourac, 2025. "Data management as a joint value proposition—A design theory for horizontal data sharing communities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Konrad Degen & Timm Teubner, 2024. "Wallet wars or digital public infrastructure? Orchestrating a digital identity data ecosystem from a government perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Maike Althaus & Christian Vorbohle & Michelle Müller & Dennis Kundisch, 2025. "Setting the stage for a flourishing cultural data ecosystem: A spotlight on business models of cultural event platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Rainer Alt, 2022. "Electronic Markets on platform transformation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 401-409, June.
    7. Rainer Alt, 2022. "From competitive advantage to social welfare," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 487-492, June.
    8. Arthur Kari & Pepe Bellin & Martin Matzner & Martin Gersch, 2025. "Governing the emergence of network-driven platform ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Mark Reuver & Hosea A. Ofe & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & Boriana Rukanova & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2024. "Data economy in a globalized world, opportunities and challenges for public and private organizations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-5, December.
    10. Daum Kim & Jiro Kokuryo, 2024. "Establishing altruistic ethics to use technology for Social Welfare—How Japan manages Web3 and self-sovereign identity in local communities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Frantz Rowe & M. Lynne Markus, 2022. "Taking the measure of digital giants: Amazon and the Social Welfare Computing research agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 437-446, June.
    12. Florian Zimmer & Janosch Haber & Mayuko Kaneko, 2025. "Enhancing Trust in Inter-Organisational Data Sharing: Levels of Assurance for Data Trustworthiness," Papers 2503.24149, arXiv.org.
    13. Yanhua Li & Tingyu Zhang, 2025. "How Does the Digital Ecosystem Foster New Quality Productive Forces? A Dynamic QCA of Sustainable Development Pathways in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, May.
    14. Wu, Mian & Liu, Yulong & Chung, Henry F.L. & Guo, Shoujia, 2022. "When and how mobile payment platform complementors matter in cross-border B2B e-commerce ecosystems? An integration of process and modularization analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 843-854.
    15. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "The platform governance triangle: conceptualising the informal regulation of online content," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22.
    16. Sung-Su Jo & Hoon Han & Yountaik Leem & Sang-Ho Lee, 2021. "Sustainable Smart Cities and Industrial Ecosystem: Structural and Relational Changes of the Smart City Industries in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Alexander Oluka, 2024. "The impact of digital platforms on traditional market structures," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(4(76)), pages 21-29, April.
    18. Sanna Malinen, 2021. "Boundary Control as Gatekeeping in Facebook Groups," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 73-81.
    19. Indu Khurana & Dev K. Dutta, 2024. "From place to space: the emergence and evolution of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems in smart cities," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 541-569, February.
    20. Hyungjun Seo & Seunghwan Myeong, 2021. "Determinant Factors for Adoption of Government as a Platform in South Korea: Mediating Effects on the Perception of Intelligent Information Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • L38 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Policy
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00752-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.