IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eaiere/v20y2023i2d10.1007_s40844-023-00264-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantity adjustment theory as a basis of evolutionary economics

Author

Listed:
  • Masashi Morioka

    (Ritsumeikan University)

Abstract

We address the basic framework of quantity adjustment theory and its significance in evolutionary economics. Quantity adjustment theory explores the mechanism of the short-term process by which capitalist firms adjust their production and raw material orders according to the demand for their products under constant prices. It finds the key features of capitalist product markets in demand constraints on production and sales competition among buyers, firms’ demand-satisfying supply behavior with buffer inventory holding, quantity adjustment process as its interactions, and continuous demand satisfaction with the permanent existence of surplus resources on the sellers’ side. As a loop composed of these features, capitalism is a production system that satisfies the needs and wants already or to be expressed through product markets. The model analysis of the quantity adjustment process indicates that individual demand-satisfying supply behaviors and their interactions result in overall buyer demand satisfaction. Stable and smooth process progression is secured by sellers’ moderate averaging in demand forecast formation based on past demands and by maintaining moderate ratios of buffer inventories to the forecasted demand. Under these conditions, firms can adapt their production to gradual changes in final demand without the duration or propagation of shortage. Quantity adjustment theory clarifies the mechanism sustaining the stationary circulation of the capitalist economy and reformulates the effective demand principle on its basis. It provides new insight into the functions of money and prices by elucidating the conditions for money to be swiftly exchangeable with any product and for prices to have the stability necessary to function as the efficiency criterion. While placing buyers of products in a dominant position in the short run, these conditions provide firms with motivations and favorable material conditions for demand-oriented innovations in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Masashi Morioka, 2023. "Quantity adjustment theory as a basis of evolutionary economics," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 367-399, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:20:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-023-00264-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s40844-023-00264-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40844-023-00264-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40844-023-00264-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan S. Blinder & Louis J. Maccini, 1991. "Taking Stock: A Critical Assessment of Recent Research on Inventories," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 73-96, Winter.
    2. Galí, Jordi & Gertler, Mark, 1999. "Inflation Dynamics: A Structural Economic Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 2246, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Mark Bils & Peter J. Klenow, 2004. "Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(5), pages 947-985, October.
    4. Kornai, Janos, 1992. "The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198287766, Decembrie.
    5. AndrÁ Simonovits, 1999. "Linear Decentralized Control with Expectations," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 321-330.
    6. Yoshinori Shiozawa, 2020. "A new framework for analyzing technological change," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 989-1034, September.
    7. Gali, Jordi & Gertler, Mark, 1999. "Inflation dynamics: A structural econometric analysis," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 195-222, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tosihiro Oka, 2024. "Impacts of international trade on the SMT view of the economy," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 321-347, September.
    2. Kazuhiro Kurose & Hiroshi Nishi, 2023. "Special issue: microfoundation of evolutionary economics and its application," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 321-328, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sedjro Aaron Alovokpinhou & Christopher Malikane & Tshepo Mokoka, 2022. "Inventory dynamics and endogenous persistence in a new Keynesian model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 1957-1973, April.
    2. Federico Di Pace & Matthias Hertweck, 2019. "Labor Market Frictions, Monetary Policy, and Durable Goods," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 32, pages 274-304, April.
    3. Atahan Afsar; José Elías Gallegos; Richard Jaimes; Edgar Silgado Gómez & José Elías Gallegos & Richard Jaimes & Edgar Silgado Gómez, 2020. "Reconciling Empirics and Theory: The Behavioral Hybrid New Keynesian Model," Vniversitas Económica, Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá, vol. 0(0), pages 1-41, December.
    4. Luca Guerrieri & Christopher Gust & J. David López-Salido, 2010. "International Competition and Inflation: A New Keynesian Perspective," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(4), pages 247-280, October.
    5. Adam Hale Shapiro, 2008. "Estimating the New Keynesian Phillips Curve: A Vertical Production Chain Approach," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(4), pages 627-666, June.
    6. Taylor, J.B., 2016. "The Staying Power of Staggered Wage and Price Setting Models in Macroeconomics," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 2009-2042, Elsevier.
    7. George-Marios Angeletos, 2018. "Frictional Coordination," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 563-603.
    8. Muto Ichiro & Shintani Kohei, 2020. "An empirical study on the New Keynesian wage Phillips curve: Japan and the US," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Glocker, Christian & Piribauer, Philipp, 2021. "Digitalization, retail trade and monetary policy," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Accolley, Delali, 2018. "Accounting for Busines Cycles in Canada: II. The Role of Money," MPRA Paper 85481, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Emmanuel De Veirman, 2022. "How Does the Phillips Curve Slope Vary with Repricing Rates?," Working Papers 735, DNB.
    12. Coibion, Olivier & Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, 2025. "Inflation, Expectations and Monetary Policy: What Have We Learned and to What End?," IZA Discussion Papers 17919, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Joseph P. Byrne & Alexandros Kontonikas & Alberto Montagnoli, 2013. "International Evidence on the New Keynesian Phillips Curve Using Aggregate and Disaggregate Data," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(5), pages 913-932, August.
    14. Ahmad, Yamin S. & Staveley-O’Carroll, Olena M., 2017. "Exploring international differences in inflation dynamics," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 115-135.
    15. Olivier Coibion & Yuriy Gorodnichenko & Johannes Wieland, 2012. "The Optimal Inflation Rate in New Keynesian Models: Should Central Banks Raise Their Inflation Targets in Light of the Zero Lower Bound?," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 79(4), pages 1371-1406.
    16. Frank Smets & Rafael Wouters, 2007. "Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(3), pages 586-606, June.
    17. Castelnuovo, Efrem & Pellegrino, Giovanni, 2018. "Uncertainty-dependent effects of monetary policy shocks: A new-Keynesian interpretation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 277-296.
    18. Jae Won Lee, 2012. "Aggregate Implications of Heterogeneous Households in a Sticky-Price Model," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(1), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Sanvi Avouyi‐Dovi & Julien Matheron, 2007. "Technology Shocks and Monetary Policy: Revisiting the Fed's Performance," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(2‐3), pages 471-507, March.
    20. M. Murat Arslan, 2013. "Optimal Monetary Policy With The Sticky Information Model Of Price Adjustment: Inflation Or Price-Level Targeting?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65, pages 106-129, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand constraint; Sales competition; Buffer inventory; Surplus resource; Shortage; Seller–buyer relationship; Stationarity Effective demand principle;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B51 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Socialist; Marxian; Sraffian
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • P51 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eaiere:v:20:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40844-023-00264-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.