IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/custns/v12y2025i1d10.1007_s40547-024-00148-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Value of Price Differentiation for Customized Products

Author

Listed:
  • Dinah A. Cohen-Vernik

    (University of Houston-Downtown)

  • Amit Pazgal

    (Rice University)

  • Xuyeing Liu

    (Nankai University)

Abstract

The continued development of product customization technologies has enabled firms to better satisfy the individual tastes of their customers. Nearly all consumers today expect some level of customization in the products they purchase, and brands selling anything from dress shirts to packaged goods have embraced the strategy of tailoring products to customer preferences. In today’s competitive landscape, firms face two fundamental customization decisions: (1) strategy (whether to offer customized products) and (2) scope (to what extent products should be customizable). We construct a game-theoretic model of duopolistic competition, integrating elements from the existing literature on customization in a unique way to analyse the impact these elements have on the outcomes of customization-related decisions. The model is solved to derive equilibrium outcomes in customization strategy, the extent of customization, pricing, demand, and profits. These outcomes are discussed and compared across two scenarios: firms employing a uniform versus differentiated pricing policy, with a focus on demonstrating the strategic value of price differentiation beyond merely extracting consumer surplus. The analysis provides several insights into the challenges and opportunities firms face when offering customizable products. For example, we find that when both firms pursue a customization strategy, it often leads to a prisoner's dilemma, suggesting that widespread customization may not be profitable. Comparing equilibrium strategies under uniform and differentiated pricing reveals potential inefficiencies of the former and strategic benefits of the latter, such as reducing the prisoner’s dilemma cost or, under certain conditions, preventing the prisoner’s dilemma outcome altogether. Further, the profit benefits of treating the choice of strategy and scope as two distinct decisions are discussed, highlighting the value of price differentiation in making these benefits more salient.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinah A. Cohen-Vernik & Amit Pazgal & Xuyeing Liu, 2025. "Strategic Value of Price Differentiation for Customized Products," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:custns:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40547-024-00148-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s40547-024-00148-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40547-024-00148-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40547-024-00148-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayd{i}n Alptekinou{g}lu & Charles J. Corbett, 2008. "Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 204-217, August.
    2. Takagoshi, Noritsugu & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2013. "Customization competition between branded firms: Continuous extension of product line from core product," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 337-352.
    3. Niladri B. Syam & Ranran Ruan & James D. Hess, 2005. "Customized Products: A Competitive Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 569-584, February.
    4. Thisse, Jacques-Francois & Vives, Xavier, 1988. "On the Strategic Choice of Spatial Price Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(1), pages 122-137, March.
    5. Nan Xia & S. Rajagopalan, 2009. "Standard vs. Custom Products: Variety, Lead Time, and Price Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 887-900, 09-10.
    6. Michaela Draganska & Dipak C. Jain, 2005. "Product‐Line Length as a Competitive Tool," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Martin J. Beckmann, 1976. "Spatial Price Policies Revisited," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 7(2), pages 619-630, Autumn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jost, Peter-J. & Süsser, Theresa, 2020. "Company-customer interaction in mass customization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Takagoshi, Noritsugu & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2013. "Customization competition between branded firms: Continuous extension of product line from core product," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 337-352.
    3. Stefano Colombo & Paolo G. Garella, 2022. "Customer‐Based Customization and Price Competition," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(4), pages 939-961, December.
    4. Peter-J. Jost, 2024. "Market expansion and the scope of mass customization," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 73-94, March.
    5. Li Chen & Yao Cui & Hau L. Lee, 2021. "Retailing with 3D Printing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 1986-2007, July.
    6. Hiroshi Aiura & Toshiki Kodera, 2024. "Location-price competition with freight absorption pricing in a data sharing economy," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Guo, Shu & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2022. "Self-design fun: Should 3D printing be employed in mass customization operations?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 883-897.
    8. Tang, Christopher S., 2010. "A review of marketing-operations interface models: From co-existence to coordination and collaboration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 22-40, May.
    9. Aoki, Reiko & Hillas, John & Kao, Tina, 2014. "Product Customization in the Spokes Model," CEI Working Paper Series 2014-8, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    10. He, Bo & Mirchandani, Prakash & Yang, Guang, 2023. "Offering custom products using a C2M model: Collaborating with an E-commerce platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    11. Hara, Reiya & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2017. "Premium store brand: Product development collaboration between retailers and national brand manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 128-138.
    12. Haim Mendelson & Ali K. Parlaktürk, 2008. "Competitive Customization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 377-390, October.
    13. Haim Mendelson & Ali K. Parlaktürk, 2008. "Product-Line Competition: Customization vs. Proliferation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(12), pages 2039-2053, December.
    14. Zhang, Chu & Zheng, Xiaona, 2021. "Customization strategies between online and offline retailers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. Amit Basu & Sreekumar Bhaskaran, 2018. "An Economic Analysis of Customer Co-design," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 787-804, December.
    16. Oksana Loginova & X. Henry Wang, 2008. "Mass Customization with Vertically Differentiated Products," Working Papers 08-33, NET Institute.
    17. Oksana Loginova, 2010. "Competitive Effects of Mass Customization," Working Papers 1007, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    18. Gökçe Esenduran & Paolo Letizia & Anton Ovchinnikov, 2022. "Customization and Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4517-4526, June.
    19. Juanjuan Zhang, 2011. "The Perils of Behavior-Based Personalization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 170-186, 01-02.
    20. Nagarajan Sethuraman & Ali K. Parlaktürk & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2023. "Personal fabrication as an operational strategy: Value of delegating production to customer using 3D printing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2362-2375, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:custns:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40547-024-00148-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.