IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v30y2024i1d10.1007_s10588-023-09373-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge sharing in a dynamic, multi-level organization: an agent-based modeling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Bianica Pires

    (The MITRE Corporation)

  • Joshua Goldstein

    (University of Virginia)

  • Emily Molfino

    (U.S. Census Bureau)

  • Kathryn Ziemer

    (Old Town Psychology)

  • Mark Orr

    (University of Virginia)

  • José Jiménez

    (Army-Baylor University)

Abstract

Organizations are complex systems comprised of many dynamic and evolving interaction patterns among individuals and groups. Understanding these interactions and how patterns, such as informal structures and knowledge sharing behavior, emerge are crucial to creating effective and efficient organizations. Studying organizations as complex systems is a challenge as we must account for hierarchically nested structures, multi-level processes, and changes over time. Informal structures interact with individual attitudes to influence organizational processes such as knowledge sharing, a process vital to organizational performance and innovation. To explore such organizational dynamics, we integrate dynamic social networks, a cognitive model of attitude formation and change, and a physical environment into an agent-based model, the combination of which represents a novel way to study organizations. We use a hospital in southwest Virginia as our case study. The agents in the model are the healthcare workers within the hospital and agent movement occurs over the physical environment of the hospital. Results show that the simulated hospital is resilient to impacts from employee attrition but that communication approaches must be thought through strategically so as not to hinder knowledge sharing. For managers, this type of modeling approach can provide resource and planning guidance in regards to attrition-based strategies and communication approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianica Pires & Joshua Goldstein & Emily Molfino & Kathryn Ziemer & Mark Orr & José Jiménez, 2024. "Knowledge sharing in a dynamic, multi-level organization: an agent-based modeling approach," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 75-100, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:30:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10588-023-09373-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-023-09373-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-023-09373-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-023-09373-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0062490 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    4. Mark E Nissen & Raymond E Levitt, 2004. "Agent-based modeling of knowledge dynamics," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 169-183, December.
    5. Kent D. Miller & Shu-Jou Lin, 2010. "Different Truths in Different Worlds," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 97-114, February.
    6. Sheen S. Levine & Michael J. Prietula, 2012. "How Knowledge Transfer Impacts Performance: A Multilevel Model of Benefits and Liabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1748-1766, December.
    7. Mary C. Jones, 2005. "Tacit Knowledge Sharing During ERP Implementation: A Multi-Site Case Study," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 18(2), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Juliette Rouchier & Paola Tubaro & Cécile Emery, 2014. "Opinion transmission in organizations: an agent-based modeling approach," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 252-277, September.
    9. Jonathon N. Cummings, 2004. "Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 352-364, March.
    10. Peter P. Mykytyn Jr. & David A. Harrison, 1993. "The Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action to Senior Management and Strategic Information Systems," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 6(2), pages 15-26, April.
    11. Hsiu-Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(1), pages 315 - 332, April.
    12. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    13. C M Macal & M J North, 2010. "Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 151-162, September.
    14. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    15. B Jamshidnezhad & K M Carley, 2015. "Agent-based modelling of quality management effects on organizational productivity," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 73-82, February.
    16. Stanley Wasserman & Philippa Pattison, 1996. "Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 401-425, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Saleh Alshebami & Abdullah Hamoud Ali Seraj & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Abdullah Sultan Al Shammre & Salem Handhal Al Marri & Abdalwali Lutfi & Mostafa Aboulnour Salem & Ashraf Mahrous Nour Zaher, 2023. "Improving Social Performance through Innovative Small Green Businesses: Knowledge Sharing and Green Entrepreneurial Intention as Antecedents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing among Employees in Organizations," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 8(1), pages 52-61, March.
    3. Ju Han Yeon & Seung-hwan Jang, 2023. "The Relation between Bio-Industry Performance and Innovation Capacity—Focusing on the Korean Bio-Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Ahyar Yuniawan & Udin Udin, 2020. "The Influence of Knowledge Sharing, Affective Commitment, and Meaningful Work on Employee‘s Performance," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 72-82.
    5. Scuotto, Veronica & Beatrice, Orlando & Valentina, Cillo & Nicotra, Melita & Di Gioia, Leonardo & Farina Briamonte, Massimiliano, 2020. "Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Xingshan Zheng & Lan Li & Fangyu Zhang & Mengyuan Zhu, 2019. "The Roles of Power Distance Orientation and Perceived Insider Status in the Subordinates’ Moqi with Supervisors and Sustainable Knowledge-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Mihaela Enache-Zegheru & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2020. "Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Affective Commitment, and Knowledge Sharing with Prosocial Organizational Behavior of Altruism and Civic Virtue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing through Social Media Platforms in the Silicon Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Kathryn Cormican & Chen Meng & Suzana Sampaio & Qiong Wu, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Knowledge Sharing Practices: An Analysis of Organizational Level Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Muhammad Asrar-ul-Haq & Sadia Anwar, 2016. "A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1127744-112, December.
    12. Lorenzo Revuelto-Taboada & Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarría & Fernando Cedeño-Alejandro, 2023. "Promoting intrapreneurial behavior in banking: the role of high-performance work systems, knowledge management processes, and supervisor support," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(3), pages 789-817, September.
    13. Rosalia Castellano & Gaetano Musella & Gennaro Punzo, 2023. "Does context matter? Exploring the effects of productive structures on the relationship between innovation and workforce skills’ complementarity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1991-2011, June.
    14. Arun Kumar A & Shekhar V, 2020. "SCL of Knowledge in Indian Universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1043-1058, September.
    15. Pantea Foroudi, 2023. "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Marketing Assets: Developing the Marketing Assets, Communication Focus, and Capability Nexus," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 203-222, August.
    16. Alexandra Portalanza-Chavarría & Lorenzo Revuelto-Taboada, 2023. "Driving intrapreneurial behavior through high-performance work systems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 897-921, June.
    17. Perotti, Francesco Antonio & Ferraris, Alberto & Candelo, Elena & Busso, Donatella, 2022. "The dark side of knowledge sharing: Exploring “knowledge sabotage” and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 422-432.
    18. Foroudi, Pantea & Gupta, Suraksha & Patel, Parth & Batsakis, Georgios & Vaatanen, Juha & Czinkota, Michael, 2023. "The effect of home country characteristics on the internationalization of EMNEs: The moderating role of knowledge stock," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    19. da Silva, Filipa Pires & Mosquera, Pilar & Soares, Maria Eduarda, 2022. "Factors influencing knowledge sharing among IT geographically dispersed teams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Farooq Ahmad & Md Billal Hossain & Khurram Mustafa & Faisal Ejaz & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Anna Dunay, 2023. "Green HRM Practices and Knowledge Sharing Improve Environmental Performance by Raising Employee Commitment to the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:30:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10588-023-09373-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.