IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v20y2012i4p755-773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guiding traffic in the case of big events with spot checks on traffic and additional parking space requirements

Author

Listed:
  • A. Kimms
  • K.-C. Maassen
  • S. Pottbäcker

Abstract

Big events lead to temporary very high traffic volumes which usually exceed traffic capabilities of the existing infrastructure. Hence, it is necessary to control traffic in a way that helps to keep traffic congestion as low as possible. In this paper we introduce a traffic planning model for big events which optimizes traffic routing, allocates parking space, and defines locations for spot checks on traffic. We extend and modify a traffic flow model that has successfully been used in previous work on evacuation planning. A computational study demonstrates the model’s applicability to a real world situation. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2012

Suggested Citation

  • A. Kimms & K.-C. Maassen & S. Pottbäcker, 2012. "Guiding traffic in the case of big events with spot checks on traffic and additional parking space requirements," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(4), pages 755-773, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:20:y:2012:i:4:p:755-773
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-011-0202-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10100-011-0202-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-011-0202-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gipps, P.G., 1981. "A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 105-111, April.
    2. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    3. Pál Pusztai, 2008. "An application of the greedy heuristic of set cover to traffic checks," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 16(4), pages 407-414, December.
    4. Tao Yao & Supreet Mandala & Byung Chung, 2009. "Evacuation Transportation Planning Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 171-189, June.
    5. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yeo, Hwasoo, 2008. "Asymmetric Microscopic Driving Behavior Theory," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1tn1m968, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Jian Li & Kaan Ozbay, 2015. "Evacuation Planning with Endogenous Transportation Network Degradations: A Stochastic Cell-Based Model and Solution Procedure," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 677-696, September.
    3. Hua Sun & Ziyou Gao & W. Szeto & Jiancheng Long & Fangxia Zhao, 2014. "A Distributionally Robust Joint Chance Constrained Optimization Model for the Dynamic Network Design Problem under Demand Uncertainty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 409-433, December.
    4. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    5. Bish, Douglas R. & Sherali, Hanif D., 2013. "Aggregate-level demand management in evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 79-92.
    6. Kimms, A. & Maiwald, M., 2018. "Bi-objective safe and resilient urban evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1122-1136.
    7. Douglas Bish & Edward Chamberlayne & Hesham Rakha, 2013. "Optimizing Network Flows with Congestion-Based Flow Reductions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 283-306, September.
    8. Qixiu Cheng & Zhiyuan Liu & Feifei Liu & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Urban dynamic congestion pricing: an overview and emerging research needs," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 3-18, August.
    9. Gentile, Guido & Meschini, Lorenzo & Papola, Natale, 2007. "Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1114-1138, December.
    10. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Huanping Li & Jian Wang & Guopeng Bai & Xiaowei Hu, 2021. "Exploring the Distribution of Traffic Flow for Shared Human and Autonomous Vehicle Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Herrera, Juan C. & Bayen, Alexandre M., 2010. "Incorporation of Lagrangian measurements in freeway traffic state estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 460-481, May.
    13. Bellei, Giuseppe & Gentile, Guido & Papola, Natale, 2005. "A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-29, January.
    14. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2006. "An Analytical Model for Traffic Delays and the Dynamic User Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1151-1171, December.
    15. Rehborn, Hubert & Klenov, Sergey L. & Palmer, Jochen, 2011. "An empirical study of common traffic congestion features based on traffic data measured in the USA, the UK, and Germany," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4466-4485.
    16. Malachy Carey & Paul Humphreys & Marie McHugh & Ronan McIvor, 2018. "Consistency and Inconsistency Between the Fundamental Relationships on Which Different Traffic Assignment Models Are Based," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1548-1569, December.
    17. Flötteröd, G. & Osorio, C., 2017. "Stochastic network link transmission model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 180-209.
    18. Flötteröd, Gunnar & Rohde, Jannis, 2011. "Operational macroscopic modeling of complex urban road intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 903-922, July.
    19. Canepa, Edward S. & Claudel, Christian G., 2017. "Networked traffic state estimation involving mixed fixed-mobile sensor data using Hamilton-Jacobi equations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 686-709.
    20. Jiang, Chenming & Bhat, Chandra R. & Lam, William H.K., 2020. "A bibliometric overview of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological in the past forty years (1979–2019)," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 268-291.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:20:y:2012:i:4:p:755-773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.