IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v338y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-024-05896-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of a time–cost trade-off in a resource-constrained GERT project scheduling problem using the Markov decision process

Author

Listed:
  • Shadi Sadri

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Amin Dehghanian

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

Abstract

Nowadays the advent of new types of projects such as startups, maintenance, and education make a revolution in project management, so that, classical project scheduling methods are incapable in analyzing of these stochastic projects. This study considers a time–cost trade-off project scheduling problem, where the structure of the project is uncertain. To deal with the uncertainties, we implemented Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT). The main aim of the study is to balance time and the amount of a non-renewable resource allocated to each activity considering the finite-time horizon and resource limitations. To preserve the generality of the model, we considered both discrete and continuous distribution functions for the activity’s duration. From a methodological standpoint, we proposed an analytical approach based on the Markov Decision Process (MDP) and Semi-Markov Decision Process (SMDP) to find the probability distribution of project makespan. These models are solved using the value iteration and a finite-horizon Linear Programming (LP) model. Two randomly generated examples explain the value iteration for models in detail. Furthermore, seven example groups each with five instances are adopted from a well-known data set, PSPLIB, to validate the efficiency of the proposed models in contrast to the two extensively-studied methods, Genetic algorithm (GA) and Monte-Carlo simulation. The convergence of the GA and simulation results to those of MDP and SMDP represent the efficiency of the proposed models. Besides, conducting a sensitivity analysis on the project completion probability with respect to the available resource, gives a good insight to managers to plan their resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Shadi Sadri & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & Amin Dehghanian, 2024. "Analysis of a time–cost trade-off in a resource-constrained GERT project scheduling problem using the Markov decision process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 535-568, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05896-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-05896-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-05896-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-05896-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Azaron, Amir & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2007. "Multi-objective time-cost trade-off in dynamic PERT networks using an interactive approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1186-1200, August.
    2. Kosugi, Takanobu & Hayashi, Ayami & Matsumoto, Tsuyoshi & Akimoto, Keigo & Tokimatsu, Koji & Yoshida, Hajime & Tomoda, Toshimasa & Kaya, Yoichi, 2004. "Time to realization: Evaluation of CO2 capture technology R&Ds by GERT (Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique) analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1297-1308.
    3. Nelson, Richard Graham & Azaron, Amir & Aref, Samin, 2016. "The use of a GERT based method to model concurrent product development processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 566-578.
    4. Said, Samer S. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2015. "A hybrid simulation-optimization approach for the robust Discrete Time/Cost Trade-off Problem," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 628-636.
    5. HazIr, Öncü & Erel, Erdal & Günalay, Yavuz, 2011. "Robust optimization models for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 87-95, March.
    6. Salim Rostami & Stefan Creemers & Roel Leus, 2018. "New strategies for stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 349-365, June.
    7. Luis F. Machado-Domínguez & Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda & Jorge I. Vélez & Agustin Barrios-Sarmiento, 2021. "A memetic algorithm to address the multi-node resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 413-429, August.
    8. Tao, Liangyan & Wu, Desheng & Liu, Sifeng & Lambert, James H., 2017. "Schedule risk analysis for new-product development: The GERT method extended by a characteristic function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 464-473.
    9. Golenko-Ginzburg, Dimitri & Gonik, Aharon & Laslo, Zohar, 2003. "Resource constrained scheduling simulation model for alternative stochastic network projects," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 105-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. Pregina & M. Ramesh Kannan, 2025. "A graphical evaluation and review technique for scheduling construction projects," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 311-328, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xue Li & Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Mario Vanhoucke, 2022. "Multimode time-cost-robustness trade-off project scheduling problem under uncertainty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1173-1202, July.
    2. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Zsolt T. Kosztyán & István Szalkai, 2020. "Multimode resource-constrained project scheduling in flexible projects," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 211-241, January.
    4. Li, Jingkui & Liu, Xiaona & Lu, Yuze & Wang, Hanzheng, 2024. "Reliability analysis on energy storage system combining GO-FLOW methodology with GERT network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    6. Rostami, Salim & Creemers, Stefan & Leus, Roel, 2024. "Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty: Activity delays and dynamic policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 16-24.
    7. Bruni, Maria Elena & Hazır, Öncü, 2024. "A risk-averse distributionally robust project scheduling model to address payment delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 398-407.
    8. Goli, Alireza, 2024. "Efficient optimization of robust project scheduling for industry 4.0: A hybrid approach based on machine learning and meta-heuristic algorithms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Yaghoubi, Saeed & Noori, Siamak & Azaron, Amir & Fynes, Brian, 2015. "Resource allocation in multi-class dynamic PERT networks with finite capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 879-894.
    10. K. Pregina & M. Ramesh Kannan, 2025. "A graphical evaluation and review technique for scheduling construction projects," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 311-328, June.
    11. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng & Gao, Su, 2021. "A reliable framework for satellite networks achieving energy requirements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Raúl Mencía & Carlos Mencía, 2021. "One-Machine Scheduling with Time-Dependent Capacity via Efficient Memetic Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Dorota Kuchta & Stanisław Stanek, 2020. "Application of Simulation to Selecting Project Strategy for Autonomous Research Projects at Public Universities," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Godinho, Pedro & Branco, Fernando G., 2012. "Adaptive policies for multi-mode project scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 553-562.
    15. Qin, Rui & Liu, Yan-Kui, 2010. "Modeling data envelopment analysis by chance method in hybrid uncertain environments," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 80(5), pages 922-950.
    16. Guido Passage & Marjan van den Akker & Han Hoogeveen, 2025. "A new, efficient approach to speed up local search by estimating the solution quality: an application to stochastic, parallel machine scheduling," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1-31, September.
    17. Kosztyán, Zsolt T. & Pribojszki-Németh, Anikó & Szalkai, István, 2019. "Hybrid multimode resource-constrained maintenance project scheduling problem," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    18. Martinsen, Dag & Linssen, Jochen & Markewitz, Peter & Vogele, Stefan, 2007. "CCS: A future CO2 mitigation option for Germany?--A bottom-up approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 2110-2120, April.
    19. Pejman Peykani & Jafar Gheidar-Kheljani & Sheida Shahabadi & Seyyed Hassan Ghodsypour & Mojtaba Nouri, 2023. "A two-phase resource-constrained project scheduling approach for design and development of complex product systems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-25, March.
    20. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05896-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.