IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v28y2025i3d10.1007_s10951-024-00832-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A graphical evaluation and review technique for scheduling construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • K. Pregina

    (Vellore Institute of Technology)

  • M. Ramesh Kannan

    (Vellore Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Scheduling a construction project is a complex procedure since it entails several sequences of various jobs or activities that need to be finished within the allotted time frame. Additionally, identifying the factors that influence the construction schedule, such as the nature of construction operations, their duration, dependence relationships, and related probabilities of occurrence, presents challenges and ambiguities. Major construction projects have traditionally been scheduled using conventional project scheduling techniques, such as the programme evaluation and review technique (PERT) and critical path method (CPM), among others. However, these construction scheduling methods continue to be inadequate for identifying the essential elements needed to generate complete and precise schedules, highlighting the need for a more effective technique to overcome uncertainties and stochastic aspects of construction scheduling. To fully comprehend these inherent stochastic properties, the present study employs the Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT), a stochastic technique for project network analysis. While prior studies support the effectiveness of GERT in the pre-construction phase, there is a lack of investigation into its practical application within the domain of residential construction. The present investigation addresses this gap by demonstrating the effectiveness of GERT in scheduling real-time residential projects by conducting a systematic and comparative analysis of GERT, PERT, and CPM methodologies across various scales of residential structures. GERT is initially applied to schedule a real-time single-storey residential structure. The GERT schedule closely reflects the as-built schedule of the structure. In addition, GERT is utilised to schedule 45 construction projects in real time, further emphasising its relevance and applicability. The GERT-generated schedule for these projects is validated for correctness by comparing it to the actual project duration. The findings demonstrate the advantages of the proposed technique in comparison to existing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Pregina & M. Ramesh Kannan, 2025. "A graphical evaluation and review technique for scheduling construction projects," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 311-328, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:28:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10951-024-00832-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-024-00832-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-024-00832-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-024-00832-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shadi Sadri & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & Amin Dehghanian, 2024. "Analysis of a time–cost trade-off in a resource-constrained GERT project scheduling problem using the Markov decision process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 535-568, July.
    2. Mirena TODOROVA, 2019. "Gert Model Of A Technical Station For Determining The Passenger Trainset Delay," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 14(1), pages 81-93, April.
    3. Tao, Liangyan & Wu, Desheng & Liu, Sifeng & Lambert, James H., 2017. "Schedule risk analysis for new-product development: The GERT method extended by a characteristic function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 464-473.
    4. Yunzhe Li & Peng Dong & Weimin Ye, 2023. "Joint duration-cost-quality optimization model for complex product supply chains under contingency conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng & Gao, Su, 2021. "A reliable framework for satellite networks achieving energy requirements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Shadi Sadri & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & Amin Dehghanian, 2024. "Analysis of a time–cost trade-off in a resource-constrained GERT project scheduling problem using the Markov decision process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 535-568, July.
    3. Li, Jingkui & Liu, Xiaona & Lu, Yuze & Wang, Hanzheng, 2024. "Reliability analysis on energy storage system combining GO-FLOW methodology with GERT network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Yang Wang & Yifeng Wang & Peng Fan, 2022. "Analysis of Micro Value Flows in the Value Chain of Eco-Innovation in Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Wang, Xiaolin & Xu, Jihui & Zhang, Lei & Wang, Ning, 2023. "Mission success probability optimizing of phased mission system balancing the phase backup and system risk: A novel GERT mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    6. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng & Gao, Su, 2021. "An agent-based clustering framework for reliable satellite networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    7. Wenjie Dong & Sifeng Liu & Zhigeng Fang & Yingsai Cao & Ye Ding, 2019. "A model based on hidden graphic evaluation and review technique network to evaluate reliability and lifetime of multi-state systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 369-378, June.
    8. Tripathy, Satchidananda & Kumar, Akhilesh & Mahanty, Biswajit, 2023. "Short-lived product returns forecasting when customers are unwilling to return the product: A grey-graphical evaluation and review technique," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:28:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10951-024-00832-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.