IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i3p369-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A model based on hidden graphic evaluation and review technique network to evaluate reliability and lifetime of multi-state systems

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjie Dong
  • Sifeng Liu
  • Zhigeng Fang
  • Yingsai Cao
  • Ye Ding

Abstract

The essence of multi-state system performance degradation is a process of deteriorating state transition. On the basis of hidden Markov model and graphic evaluation and review technique network, this article proposes a new reliability assessment method called hidden graphic evaluation and review technique network model for multi-state system. Specifically, nodes in graphic evaluation and review technique network represent hidden states of a system at different deteriorating times, and they can be expanded through a series of observable sequences. Baum–Welch algorithm in hidden Markov model is introduced to train parameters and when logarithmic likelihood function of the output reaches convergent, we can estimate the most probable output state and obtain the state transition probability eventually. Suppose performance degradation amount between different nodes follows gamma distribution, a method of improved maximum likelihood function is introduced to estimate parameters. According to signal flow graph theory and Mason formula, equivalent transfer function from the initial node to any other nodes can be obtained, then expectation and variance of performance degradation amount can be presented. In the real case study, we compare the reliability assessment method proposed in this article with other two traditional methods, which show the rationality of hidden graphic evaluation and review technique network model.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjie Dong & Sifeng Liu & Zhigeng Fang & Yingsai Cao & Ye Ding, 2019. "A model based on hidden graphic evaluation and review technique network to evaluate reliability and lifetime of multi-state systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 369-378, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:369-378
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18788414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18788414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18788414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keedy, Elias & Feng, Qianmei, 2012. "A physics-of-failure based reliability and maintenance modeling framework for stent deployment and operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 94-101.
    2. Chen, Ying & Yang, Liu & Ye, Cui & Kang, Rui, 2015. "Failure mechanism dependence and reliability evaluation of non-repairable system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 273-283.
    3. Chen, Nan & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Xiang, Yisha & Zhang, Linmiao, 2015. "Condition-based maintenance using the inverse Gaussian degradation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 190-199.
    4. Tao, Liangyan & Wu, Desheng & Liu, Sifeng & Lambert, James H., 2017. "Schedule risk analysis for new-product development: The GERT method extended by a characteristic function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 464-473.
    5. Zhou, Li & Xie, Jiaping & Gu, Xiaoyu & Lin, Yong & Ieromonachou, Petros & Zhang, Xiaole, 2016. "Forecasting return of used products for remanufacturing using Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 315-324.
    6. Jingyuan Shen & Lirong Cui, 2017. "Reliability performance for dynamic multi-state repairable systems with regimes," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(9), pages 911-926, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yousefi, Nooshin & Coit, David W. & Song, Sanling, 2020. "Reliability analysis of systems considering clusters of dependent degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Li, Ying Yi & Chen, Ying & Yuan, Zeng Hui & Tang, Ning & Kang, Rui, 2017. "Reliability analysis of multi-state systems subject to failure mechanism dependence based on a combination method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 109-123.
    3. Tripathy, Satchidananda & Kumar, Akhilesh & Mahanty, Biswajit, 2023. "Short-lived product returns forecasting when customers are unwilling to return the product: A grey-graphical evaluation and review technique," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Zhang, Mimi & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2015. "Degradation-based maintenance decision using stochastic filtering for systems under imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 531-541.
    5. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Hu, Chang-Hua & He, Xiao & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Liu, Yang & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2017. "Lifetime prognostics for deteriorating systems with time-varying random jumps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 338-350.
    6. Lin, Yan-Hui & Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "A comparison between Monte Carlo simulation and finite-volume scheme for reliability assessment of multi-state physics systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Verbert, K. & De Schutter, B. & Babuška, R., 2017. "Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 310-321.
    8. Fang, Jiayue & Kang, Rui & Chen, Ying, 2021. "Reliability evaluation of non-repairable systems with failure mechanism trigger effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Du, Dang-Bo & Hu, Chang-Hua & Hu, Chen, 2020. "A novel iterative approach of lifetime estimation for standby systems with deteriorating spare parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Jin, Guang & Matthews, David E. & Zhou, Zhongbao, 2013. "A Bayesian framework for on-line degradation assessment and residual life prediction of secondary batteries inspacecraft," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 7-20.
    11. David T. Abdul‐Malak & Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh & Lisa M. Maillart, 2019. "Maintaining systems with heterogeneous spare parts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(6), pages 485-501, September.
    12. Jianxun Zhang & Xiao He & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Donghua Zhou, 2017. "A Novel Multi-Phase Stochastic Model for Lithium-Ion Batteries’ Degradation with Regeneration Phenomena," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Yang, Ao & Qiu, Qingan & Zhu, Mingren & Cui, Lirong & Chen, Weilin & Chen, Jianhui, 2022. "Condition-based maintenance strategy for redundant systems with arbitrary structures using improved reinforcement learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    14. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    15. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    16. Liu, Bin & Liang, Zhenglin & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "Condition-based maintenance for systems with aging and cumulative damage based on proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 200-209.
    17. Chen, Ying & Wang, Ze & Li, YingYi & Kang, Rui & Mosleh, Ali, 2018. "Reliability analysis of a cold-standby system considering the development stages and accumulations of failure mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Bae, Suk Joo & Yuan, Tao & Ning, Shuluo & Kuo, Way, 2015. "A Bayesian approach to modeling two-phase degradation using change-point regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 66-74.
    19. Liu, Bin & Wu, Shaomin & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance policy for degrading systems with age- and state-dependent operating cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 879-887.
    20. Geng, Sunyue & Liu, Sifeng & Fang, Zhigeng & Gao, Su, 2021. "A reliable framework for satellite networks achieving energy requirements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:369-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.