IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v337y2024i3d10.1007_s10479-023-05729-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamical inspection game with continuous strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Ugo Merlone

    (University of Turin)

  • Giovanni Orlando

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Arianna Dal Forno

    (University of Molise)

Abstract

Most contributions on the inspection game concern arm control and disarmament; recently some contributions have considered organizational settings. We consider an inspection game where a principal chooses to inspect or not inspect and an agent simultaneously can either work or shirk. Combined payoffs are maximized when the principal does not inspect and the agent works while the unique Nash equilibrium of the stage game is in mixed strategies with positive probabilities of inspecting/shirking. To overcome this difficulty we introduce a continuous action version of the inspection game which extends the original formulation and discuss the existence of the Nash equilibria in pure strategies depending on the convexity of the cost functions we consider. Then, as most of the interactions in organizations develop over time, we propose a dynamic model with adaptive adjustment. We address some characteristics of the dynamic behavior of the game and the bifurcations observed, through both analytical and numerical methods. For the dynamical game we determine the fixed points, and study their stability. Fixed points are related to the Nash equilibria of the continuous inspection game and the collectively optimal outcome is obtained as a fixed point that is just virtual. Our findings are interpreted in terms of stakeholders theory, relational contracts and negotiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ugo Merlone & Giovanni Orlando & Arianna Dal Forno, 2024. "Dynamical inspection game with continuous strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 337(3), pages 1205-1234, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:337:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05729-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05729-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05729-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05729-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dal Forno, Arianna & Merlone, Ugo, 2010. "Incentives and individual motivation in supervised work groups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 878-885, December.
    2. Encinosa III, William E. & Gaynor, Martin & Rebitzer, James B., 2007. "The sociology of groups and the economics of incentives: Theory and evidence on compensation systems," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 187-214, February.
    3. Jonathan Levin, 2003. "Relational Incentive Contracts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 835-857, June.
    4. Xianming Zhou, 2002. "A Graphical Approach to the Standard Principal-Agent Model," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 265-276, September.
    5. Martin Shubik, 1972. "On Gaming and Game Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5-Part-2), pages 37-53, January.
    6. Daniele Nosenzo & Theo Offerman & Martin Sefton & Ailko van der Veen, 2016. "Discretionary Sanctions and Rewards in the Repeated Inspection Game," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 502-517, February.
    7. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1987. "Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 303-328, March.
    8. Robert Gibbons & Rebecca Henderson, 2012. "Relational Contracts and Organizational Capabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1350-1364, October.
    9. Simon Board, 2011. "Relational Contracts and the Value of Loyalty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 3349-3367, December.
    10. Oechssler, Jorg, 1997. "An Evolutionary Interpretation of Mixed-Strategy Equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 21(1-2), pages 203-237, October.
    11. Sendil K. Ethiraj & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Hoping for A to Z While Rewarding Only A: Complex Organizations and Multiple Goals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 4-21, February.
    12. Schattler, Heinz & Sung, Jaeyoung, 1997. "On optimal sharing rules in discrete-and continuous-time principal-agent problems with exponential utility," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 551-574.
    13. R. A. Thiétart & B. Forgues, 1995. "Chaos Theory and Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 19-31, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dal Forno, Arianna & Merlone, Ugo, 2010. "Incentives and individual motivation in supervised work groups," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 878-885, December.
    2. Ricard Gil & Myongjin Kim & Giorgio Zanarone, 2022. "Relationships Under Stress: Relational Outsourcing in the U.S. Airline Industry After the 2008 Financial Crisis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1256-1277, February.
    3. Jaeyoung Sung, 2022. "Optimal contracting under mean-volatility joint ambiguity uncertainties," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(2), pages 593-642, September.
    4. W. Bentley MacLeod, 2006. "Reputations, Relationships and the Enforcement of Incomplete Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 1730, CESifo.
    5. Egil Matsen, 2005. "Portfolio choice when managers control returns," Working Paper 2005/15, Norges Bank.
    6. Matthias Fahn & Hendrik Hakenes, 2019. "Teamwork as a Self-Disciplining Device," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 1-32, November.
    7. Arianna Dal Forno & Ugo Merlone, 2021. "Envy effects on conflict dynamics in supervised work groups," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 755-779, December.
    8. Tukiainen, Janne & Blesse, Sebastian & Bohne, Albrecht & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Jääskeläinen, Jan & Luukinen, Ari & Sieppi, Antti, 2024. "What are the priorities of bureaucrats? Evidence from conjoint experiments with procurement officials," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    9. Jessica Martin & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2021. "A Class of Explicit optimal contracts in the face of shutdown," Working Papers hal-03124102, HAL.
    10. Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine, 2008. "Continuous time limits of repeated games with imperfect public monitoring," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Drew Fudenberg & David K Levine (ed.), A Long-Run Collaboration On Long-Run Games, chapter 17, pages 369-388, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Kukharskyy, Bohdan, 2015. "Relational contracts and global sourcing," University of Tübingen Working Papers in Business and Economics 83, University of Tuebingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, School of Business and Economics.
    12. Jakv{s}a Cvitani'c & Dylan Possamai & Nizar Touzi, 2015. "Dynamic programming approach to principal-agent problems," Papers 1510.07111, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2017.
    13. Jessica Martin & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2023. "Risk-sharing and optimal contracts with large exogenous risks," Post-Print hal-04164688, HAL.
    14. Egil Matsen, 2001. "On Asymmetric Information across Countries and the Home-Bias Puzzel," Working Paper Series 0202, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    15. Rocco Macchiavello & Ameet Morjaria, 2023. "Relational Contracts: Recent Empirical Advancements and Open Questions," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 179(3-4), pages 673-700.
    16. Martin, Jessica & Villeneuve, Stéphane, 2021. "A Class of Explicit optimal contracts in the face of shutdown," TSE Working Papers 21-1183, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Apr 2022.
    17. Barlo, Mehmet & Özdog˜an, Ayça, 2014. "Optimality of linearity with collusion and renegotiation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-52.
    18. Alberto Bayo-Moriones & Jose E. Galdon-Sanchez & Sara Martinez-de-Morentin, 2017. "Performance Measurement and Incentive Intensity," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 496-546, December.
    19. Yaozhong Wu & Christoph H. Loch & Ludo Van der Heyden, 2008. "A Model of Fair Process and Its Limits," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 637-653, June.
    20. Muller, Holger M., 1998. "The First-Best Sharing Rule in the Continuous-Time Principal-Agent Problem with Exponential Utility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 276-280, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:337:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05729-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.