IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v13y2023i1d10.1007_s13162-022-00235-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market orientation (once again): Challenges and a suggested solution

Author

Listed:
  • Aksel I. Rokkan

    (Norwegian School of Economics (NHH))

Abstract

Previous research shows almost unequivocally that market orientation (MO) has positive performance consequences for companies. However, research conceptualizes MO as (potentially) too abstract and broad. Consequently, detecting negative performance implications from it is difficult. In this article, I propose to deconstruct MO. First, rather than operating MO as an integrated construct, I suggest treating MO as a class of orientations that share certain properties but differ on important others. I detail the competitive logic of and main risks related to alternative MOs and, drawing from literature on marketing, economics, and strategy, suggest contingencies for alternative MOs to perform well. Second, I propose measuring each individual MO (e.g., customer-centric) as a product of the two forms of orientations (strategy/plan and information) embedded within it. This suggested measurement approach enables further scrutiny of the association between MO and company performance. I conclude with a discussion of the potential implications for research and marketing management which could result from treating MO as a construct class.

Suggested Citation

  • Aksel I. Rokkan, 2023. "Market orientation (once again): Challenges and a suggested solution," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 71-91, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00235-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-022-00235-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-022-00235-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-022-00235-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gal-Or, Esther, 1985. "First Mover and Second Mover Advantages," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 26(3), pages 649-653, October.
    2. Shelby D. Hunt, 2012. "Explaining empirically successful marketing theories: the inductive realist model, approximate truth, and market orientation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 2(1), pages 5-18, March.
    3. Buvik, Arnt & Reve, Torger, 2001. "Asymmetrical deployment of specific assets and contractual safeguarding in industrial purchasing relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 101-113, February.
    4. Barry L. Bayus & Gary Erickson & Robert Jacobson, 2003. "The Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the Personal Computer Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 197-210, February.
    5. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Research on market orientation: Some lessons shared and issues discussed in a doctoral seminar," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 26-35, June.
    6. Constantine Andriopoulos & Marianne W. Lewis, 2009. "Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 696-717, August.
    7. G. Tomas M. Hult & David J. Ketchen, 2017. "Disruptive marketing strategy," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 20-25, June.
    8. Henry Mintzberg, 1978. "Patterns in Strategy Formation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 934-948, May.
    9. Bernard J. Jaworski & Ajay K. Kohli, 2017. "Conducting field-based, discovery-oriented research: lessons from our market orientation research experience," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 4-12, June.
    10. Nelson, Phillip, 1980. "Comments on "The Economics of Consumer Information Acquisition."," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(3), pages 163-165, July.
    11. Jeffrey G. Covin & Dennis P. Slevin, 1989. "Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 75-87, January.
    12. Wilde, Louis L, 1980. "The Economics of Consumer Information Acquisition," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(3), pages 143-158, July.
    13. Anna S. Cui & Fang Wu, 2016. "Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 516-538, July.
    14. Esther Gal-Or, 1987. "First Mover Disadvantages with Private Information," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 54(2), pages 279-292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O. C. Ferrell, 2018. "Marketing’s identity crisis: it’s complicated," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(1), pages 30-38, June.
    2. Nathaniel D. Line & Rodney C. Runyan & Tracy Gonzalez-Padron, 2019. "Multiple stakeholder market orientation: a service-dominant logic perspective of the market orientation paradigm," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 42-60, June.
    3. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    4. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Research on market orientation: Some lessons shared and issues discussed in a doctoral seminar," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 26-35, June.
    5. Danny Miller & Cyrille Sardais, 2015. "Bifurcating Time: How Entrepreneurs Reconcile the Paradoxical Demands of the Job," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(3), pages 489-512, May.
    6. Luo, Huajiang & Niu, Baozhuang, 2022. "Impact of competition type on a competitive manufacturer's preference of decision timing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    7. João José M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2016. "A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 1-32, October.
    8. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt, 2020. "The impact of industry-wide and target market environmental hostility on entrepreneurial leadership in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    9. Marko Matalamäki & Tero Vuorinen & Elina Varamäki & Kirsti Sorama, 2017. "Business Growth in Established Companies; Roles of Effectuation and Causation," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(02), pages 123-148, June.
    10. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.
    11. Kubler, Dorothea & Muller, Wieland, 2002. "Simultaneous and sequential price competition in heterogeneous duopoly markets: experimental evidence," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(10), pages 1437-1460, December.
    12. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka & Charlotta Windahl, 2019. "Capabilities for market-shaping: triggering and facilitating increased value creation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 617-639, July.
    13. repec:dpr:wpaper:0908 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Kosuke Hirose & Sang-ho Lee & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2017. "Environmental corporate social responsibility : A note on the first-mover advantage under price competition," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(1), pages 214-221.
    15. Lenhard, Severin, 2022. "Imperfect competition with costly disposal," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    17. Floyd, Kristopher & Freling, Ryan & Alhoqail, Saad & Cho, Hyun Young & Freling, Traci, 2014. "How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 217-232.
    18. Chowdhury, Shamsud D. & Lang, James R., 1996. "Turnaround in small firms: An assessment of efficiency strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 169-178, June.
    19. Cumbul, Eray, 2021. "Stackelberg versus Cournot oligopoly with private information," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    20. Gregory G. Dess & Brian C. Pinkham & Haibin Yang, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Orientation: Assessing the Construct's Validity and Addressing Some of Its Implications for Research in the Areas of Family Business and Organizational Learning," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 1077-1090, September.
    21. Eric Rasmusen & Young-Ro Yoon, 2008. "First versus Second-Mover Advantage with Information Asymmetry about the Size of New Markets," Working Papers 2008-15, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00235-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.