IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v42y2025i1d10.1007_s10460-024-10638-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food crises in the third food regime: an exploratory frame analysis of mainstream governance responses

Author

Listed:
  • Phoebe Stephens

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Lucy Hinton

    (Western University)

Abstract

The ‘new normality’ of food crises requires nuanced understandings of emergent responses. Through an exploratory analysis of public-facing reports from major food governance actors, this study empirically outlines mainstream solution frames for addressing the contemporary food crisis and the ways in which these differ from the 2008 food crisis. Using food regime theory as the theoretical underpinning, four con­sistently used solution frames are identified that provide insight into the organizing principles of the third food regime: promoting trade liberalization, emphasizing agricultural productivism, mobilizing private finance, and leveraging data. The latter two involve recent shifts in governance responses that shape global food governance and impact global food insecurity in novel ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Phoebe Stephens & Lucy Hinton, 2025. "Food crises in the third food regime: an exploratory frame analysis of mainstream governance responses," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 69-88, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10638-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-024-10638-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-024-10638-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-024-10638-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew C. Canfield & Jessica Duncan & Priscilla Claeys, 2021. "Reconfiguring Food Systems Governance: The UNFSS and the Battle Over Authority and Legitimacy," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(3), pages 181-191, December.
    2. Nora McKeon, 2021. "Global Food Governance," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(1), pages 48-55, June.
    3. Lajoie-O'Malley, Alana & Bronson, Kelly & van der Burg, Simone & Klerkx, Laurens, 2020. "The future(s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    4. Louisa Prause & Sarah Hackfort & Margit Lindgren, 2021. "Digitalization and the third food regime," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 641-655, September.
    5. Fuchs, Doris & Lederer, Markus ML, 2007. "The Power of Business," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    7. Kate Bayliss & Elisa Van Waeyenberge, 2018. "Unpacking the Public Private Partnership Revival," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 577-593, April.
    8. Jennifer Clapp & Sophia Murphy, 2013. "The G20 and Food Security: a Mismatch in Global Governance?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(2), pages 129-138, May.
    9. Jacobs, Lawrence & King, Desmond, 2016. "Fed Power: How Finance Wins," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199388967, Decembrie.
    10. Frison, Emile & Clément, Chantal, 2020. "The potential of diversified agroecological systems to deliver healthy outcomes: Making the link between agriculture, food systems & health," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Jennifer Clapp & Indra Noyes & Zachary Grant, 2021. "The Food Systems Summit’s Failure to Address Corporate Power," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(3), pages 192-198, December.
    12. Nora McKeon, 2021. "Global Food Governance," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(3), pages 172-180, December.
    13. Jessica Duncan & Priscilla Claeys, 2018. "Politicizing food security governance through participation: opportunities and opposition," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1411-1424, December.
    14. Swinnen, Johan & McDermott, John & Yosef, Sivan & Díaz-Bonilla, Eugenio & Vos, Rob, 2021. "Beyond the pandemic: Transforming food systems after COVID-19," IFPRI book chapters, in: 2021 Global food policy report: Transforming food systems after COVID-19, chapter 1, pages 6-23, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Dagmar Milerová Prášková & Josef Novotný, 2021. "The rise and fall of the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition: a tale of two discourses," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 1751-1769, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Pellizzoni & Laura Centemeri & Maura Benegiamo & Carla Panico, 2025. "A new food security approach? Continuity and novelty in the European Union’s turn to preparedness," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 89-105, March.
    2. Anis Chowdhury & Jomo Kwame Sundaram, 2023. "Chronicles of Debt Crises Foretold," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(5), pages 994-1030, September.
    3. Shalmali Guttal, 2021. "Re-imagining the UN Committee on World Food Security," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(3), pages 227-235, December.
    4. Johanna Wilkes, 2022. "Reconnecting with Nature through Good Governance: Inclusive Policy across Scales," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Vezzoni Rubén, 2024. "A “return of the state” in energy transitions? The making of a hydrogen economy in the European Union," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 68(3-4), pages 195-212.
    6. Molly Sundberg, 2024. "For the Country, the Corporation and the Métier: Alternative Drivers Among Practitioners in Private Sector Aid," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 24(4), pages 340-356, October.
    7. Julie Guthman & Michaelanne Butler, 2023. "Fixing food with a limited menu: on (digital) solutionism in the agri-food tech sector," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 835-848, September.
    8. Maria Contesse & Jessica Duncan & Katharine Legun & Laurens Klerkx, 2024. "(Un)intended lock-in: Chile’s organic agriculture law and the possibility of transformation towards more sustainable food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(1), pages 167-187, March.
    9. Mascha Gugganig & Karly Ann Burch & Julie Guthman & Kelly Bronson, 2023. "Contested agri-food futures: Introduction to the Special Issue," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 787-798, September.
    10. Ali Rıza Güngen, 2023. "New Multilateral Development Banks and Green Lending: Approaching Scalar Complexities in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(2), pages 251-279, March.
    11. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    12. Fearn, Gareth, 2025. "Electricity decarbonisation targets and the distribution dilemma," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Zoltán Lakner & Brigitta Plasek & Gyula Kasza & Anna Kiss & Sándor Soós & Ágoston Temesi, 2021. "Towards Understanding the Food Consumer Behavior–Food Safety–Sustainability Triangle: A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Brendan Whitty & Jessica Sklair & Paul Robert Gilbert & Emma Mawdsley & Jo‐Anna Russon & Olivia Taylor, 2023. "Outsourcing the Business of Development: The Rise of For‐profit Consultancies in the UK Aid Sector," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(4), pages 892-917, July.
    15. El Tinay, Hassan & Schor, Juliet B., 2025. "Do economists think about climate change and inequality? Semantic analysis and topic modeling of top five economics journals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    16. Dimitar Anguelov, 2024. "State‐owned Enterprises and the Politics of Financializing Infrastructure Development in Indonesia: De‐risking at the Limit?," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(3), pages 493-529, May.
    17. Hanna Hilbrandt & Monika Grubbauer, 2020. "Standards and SSOs in the contested widening and deepening of financial markets: The arrival of Green Municipal Bonds in Mexico City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1415-1433, October.
    18. Steyaert, Amber & Kuyper, Thomas & Dessein, Joost & Prové, Charlotte, 2025. "Urban food policy councils as politicized spaces: The case of Arusha, Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    19. Giagnocavo, Cynthia & Duque-Acevedo, Mónica & Terán-Yépez, Eduardo & Herforth-Rahmé, Joelle & Defossez, Emeline & Carlesi, Stefano & Delalieux, Stephanie & Gkisakis, Vasileios & Márton, Aliz & Molina-, 2025. "A multi-stakeholder perspective on the use of digital technologies in European organic and agroecological farming systems," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Deleidi, Matteo & Mazzucato, Mariana & Semieniuk, Gregor, 2020. "Neither crowding in nor out: Public direct investment mobilising private investment into renewable electricity projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10460-024-10638-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.