IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sos/sosjrn/080206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Fiscal Policy Rules on Fiscal Balance: The Perspectives on Turkish Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Hayal Ayça ŞİMŞEK
  • Ayşe GÜNAY BEKÂR

Abstract

In public finance theory fiscal rules have been one of the main stabilization tools in obtaining budget balance and public finance balance. Many developed and developing countries have implemented specific fiscal policy rules so as to struggle with domestic distortions in economy. Balanced budget or deficit rules, borrowing rules and debt or reserve rules have been the most important rules that have been implemented in specific countries. A fiscal rule should ensure the solvency of the state, contribute to sustainability of fiscal policies by avoiding pro-cyclical behavior of the fiscal policy instruments and be simple and credible so as to be implemented effectively. In Turkish economy a specific form of a fiscal rule has been implemented since 2000 economic crisis. During 2000-07 period the Governments used a specific form of fiscal policy rule –non-interest budget surplus of 6,5 percent- so as to reduce instability. Although strict fiscal policies based on this target helped public finance balance to improve, they led private investments to decrease and unemployment rates to increase in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayal Ayça ŞİMŞEK & Ayşe GÜNAY BEKÂR, 2008. "The Effects of Fiscal Policy Rules on Fiscal Balance: The Perspectives on Turkish Economy," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 2008-2.
    • Handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:080206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/197634
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davina Jacobs & Nj Schoeman & Jh Van Heerden, 2002. "Alternative Definitions of the Budget Deficit and its Impact on the Sustainability of Fiscal Policy in South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 70(3), pages 251-257, March.
    2. Suzanne Kennedy & Janine Robbins, "undated". "The Role of Fiscal Rules in Determining Fiscal Performance," Working Papers-Department of Finance Canada 2001-16, Department of Finance Canada.
    3. Bohn, Henning & Inman, Robert P., 1996. "Balanced-budget rules and public deficits: evidence from the U.S. states," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 13-76, December.
    4. Henning Bohn & Robert P. Inman, "undated". "Balanced Budget Rules and Public Deficits: Evidence from the U.S. States (Reprint 060)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 10-96, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    5. Jonathan Millar, 1997. "The Effects of Budget Rules on Fiscal Performance and Macroeconomic Stabilization," Staff Working Papers 97-15, Bank of Canada.
    6. Mr. George Kopits & Mr. Steven A. Symansky, 1998. "Fiscal Policy Rules," IMF Occasional Papers 1998/011, International Monetary Fund.
    7. Paolo Manasse, 2007. "Deficit Limits and Fiscal Rules for Dummies," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 54(3), pages 455-473, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariano Tommasi & Miguel Braun, 2002. "Fiscal Rules for Subnational Governments. Some Organizing Principles and Latin American Experiences," Working Papers 44, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Mar 2002.
    2. Soyoung Park & Sungchan Kim, 2022. "The Effects of Fiscal Rules Based on Revenue Structure: Evidence from U.S State Governments," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 39(3), pages 763-781, October.
    3. Cardona Bermeo, Jorge Enrique, 2002. "Manejo de pasivos contingentes en el marco de la disciplina fiscal en Colombia," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34872, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    4. Vlenadia, Antonio, 2002. "A risk quantification model for public debt management," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34867, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Amélie Barbier-Gauchard & Kea Baret & Alexandru Minea, 2021. "National fiscal rules and fiscal discipline in the European Union," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(20), pages 2337-2359, April.
    6. Guerguil, Martine & Mandon, Pierre & Tapsoba, René, 2017. "Flexible fiscal rules and countercyclical fiscal policy," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 189-220.
    7. Iara, Anna & Wolff, Guntram B., 2014. "Rules and risk in the Euro area," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 222-236.
    8. Boris Begović & Tanasije Marinković & Marko Paunović, 2017. "A Case For Introduction Of Numerical Fiscal Rules In Serbian Constitution," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 62(212), pages 7-42, January -.
    9. Mr. Ananthakrishnan Prasad & Mr. Adarsh Kishore, 2007. "Indian Subnational Finances: Recent Performance," IMF Working Papers 2007/205, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Mello, Luiz R. de, 2002. "Fiscal decentralization and borrowing costs: the case of local governments," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34881, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    11. Rafal Benecki & Jens Hölscher & Mariusz Jarmuzek, 2006. "Fiscal transparency and policy rules in Poland," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 65, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    12. Nazareth, Paula Alexandra & Porto, Luiz Fernando Lopes, 2002. "As finanças dos municípios brasileiros: o caso do Rio de Janeiro," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34882, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    13. Frank Bodmer, 2006. "The Swiss Debt Brake: How it Works and What Can Go Wrong," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 142(III), pages 307-330, September.
    14. Viol, Andrea Lemgruber, 2002. "Renúncia tributária no Brasil," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34878, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. Figueroa, Ramón, 2002. "Los avances y potencialidades de los sistemas integrados de administración financiera del sector público," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34879, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    16. Luiz R. De Mello Jr., 2001. "Fiscal Decentralization and Borrowing Costs: The Case of Local Governments," Public Finance Review, , vol. 29(2), pages 108-138, March.
    17. Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria, 2004. "Good, bad or ugly? On the effects of fiscal rules with creative accounting," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1-2), pages 377-394, January.
    18. Jorratt, Michel & Barra, Patricio, 2002. "Medición del gasto tributario en Chile," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34875, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. Hussein, Khaled A & Mello, Luiz R. de, 2002. "Is foreign debt portfolio management efficient in emerging economies?: emphasis on Latin America," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34868, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    20. Simonit, Silvia, 2002. "Los gastos tributarios y las renuncias tributarias en América Latina," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34873, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fiscal Policy Rules; Public Finance Balance; Non-interest Budget Surplus.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus
    • H68 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt
    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:080206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aysen Sivrikaya (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sosyoekonomijournal.org/home.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.