IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Raising Canadian Living Standards: A Framework for Analysis

Listed author(s):
  • Andrew Sharpe


The living standards in Canada, defined as real GDP per capita, declined relative to those in the United States in the 1990s. A key challenge facing Canadians is the reversal of this situation. In this article, Andrew Sharpe of the Centre for the Study of Living Standards develops a framework for the analysis of living standards and outlines a strategy to raise living standards. Sharpe first examines trends in and determinants of living standards in Canada. He finds that over the 1946-2001 period productivity growth accounted for all the growth in living standards. Large declines in average hours worked reduced living standard growth, but increased labour force participation and a more favourable demographic structure made a positive contribution. Sharpe notes that living standards could be increased by lower unemployment, greater labour force participation, and longer working time, but points out that there is little scope for long-term improvement from these sources. Rather, he argues, productivity growth represents the only sustained avenue for living standards growth. With our level of aggregate labour productivity 16 per cent below the US level, Canada has the potential to reduce much of the productivity gap with the United States and possibly even to eliminate it completely. Such a development would allow Canadians to achieve US levels of real GDP pr capita, or if they so chose, to take the productivity gains in the form of increased leisure.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
File Function: version en francais, pp:25-43
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Centre for the Study of Living Standards in its journal International Productivity Monitor.

Volume (Year): 5 (2002)
Issue (Month): (Fall)
Pages: 23-40

in new window

Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:2
Contact details of provider: Postal:
151 Slater Street, Suite 710, Ottawa, ON K1P 5H3

Phone: 613-233-8891
Fax: 613-233-8250
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: Email:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Osberg, L. & Sharpe, A., 1998. "An Index of Economic Well-being for Canada," Department of Economics at Dalhousie University working papers archive 98-08, Dalhousie, Department of Economics.
  2. Andrew Sharpe, 2002. "Recent Productivity Development in the United States and Canada: Implications for the Canada-U.S. Productivity and Income Gap," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 4, pages 3-14, Spring.
  3. Andrew Sharpe, 2002. "Productivity Concepts, Trends And Prospects: An Overview," The Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress,in: Andrew Sharpe, Executive Director & France St-Hilaire, Vice-President , Research & Keith Banting, Di (ed.), The Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress 2002: Towards a Social Understanding of Productivity, volume 2 Centre for the Study of Living Standards;The Institutute for Research on Public Policy.
  4. Lars Osberg & Andrew Sharpe, 2010. "The Index of Economic Well-Being," Challenge, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 53(4), pages 25-42, July.
  5. Pierre Fortin, 2001. "The Irish Economic Boom: What Can We Learn?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 3, pages 19-31, Fall.
  6. Osberg, Lars & Sharpe, Andrew, 2002. "An Index of Economic Well-Being for Selected OECD Countries," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 48(3), pages 291-316, September.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:5:y:2002:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CSLS)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.