IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Raising Canadian Living Standards: A Framework for Discussion

Listed author(s):
  • Centre for the Study of Living Standards


Registered author(s):

    Canada’s living standards have been falling relative to those in the United States in recent years. The Chairman and CEO of the TD Bank Financial Group, Charles Baillie (2001) has suggested that Canadians adopt as a societal goal not only the reversal of this downward trend, but that Canadian living standards exceed US living standards within 15 years. Policies that the public and private sectors might adopt to attain this very ambitious objective were the focus at the multi-stakeholder roundtable organized for October 7-8, 2002. The objective of this background paper is to provide a framework for discussion of the issue of raising Canadian living standards. The paper first discusses definitions of living standards and related concepts. It then examines trends of living standards historically in Canada and the United States and in OECD countries. The third section looks at the relative importance of the determinants of living standards ?productivity, working time, demographic structures, labour force participation, and the unemployment rate ?in the growth of living standards in Canada and in accounting for the income gap with the United States and other countries. The fourth section discusses what strategies need to be pursued in terms of the five determinants of living standards growth for Canada to exceed US living standards by 2016. The key conclusions of the paper are twofold. First, a focus on improving Canada’s productivity growth performance, and in particular, eliminating the Canada-US productivity gap, is by far the most important and effective way to attain the objective of Canadian living standards exceeding US living standards by 2016. Second, an objective for Canada of matching or exceeding the US productivity level is probably a better societal objective than equaling or exceeding US living standards, as measured by GDP per capita. Attaining this objective would certainly give Canadians the opportunity to have the same level of per capita income as Americans, but it would also give Canadians the option of choosing more leisure time, a component of economic well-being that is currently not incorporated into GDP.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for the Study of Living Standards in its series CSLS Research Reports with number 02td.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Oct 2002
    Handle: RePEc:sls:resrep:02td
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    151 Slater Street, Suite 710, Ottawa, ON K1P 5H3

    Phone: 613-233-8891
    Fax: 613-233-8250
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web: Email:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Osberg, L. & Sharpe, A., 1998. "An Index of Economic Well-being for Canada," Department of Economics at Dalhousie University working papers archive 98-08, Dalhousie, Department of Economics.
    2. Andrew Sharpe, 2002. "Recent Productivity Development in the United States and Canada: Implications for the Canada-U.S. Productivity and Income Gap," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 4, pages 3-14, Spring.
    3. Andrew Sharpe, 2002. "Productivity Concepts, Trends And Prospects: An Overview," The Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress,in: Andrew Sharpe, Executive Director & France St-Hilaire, Vice-President , Research & Keith Banting, Di (ed.), The Review of Economic Performance and Social Progress 2002: Towards a Social Understanding of Productivity, volume 2 Centre for the Study of Living Standards;The Institutute for Research on Public Policy.
    4. Lars Osberg & Andrew Sharpe, 2010. "The Index of Economic Well-Being," Challenge, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 53(4), pages 25-42, July.
    5. Pierre Fortin, 2001. "The Irish Economic Boom: What Can We Learn?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 3, pages 19-31, Fall.
    6. Osberg, Lars & Sharpe, Andrew, 2002. "An Index of Economic Well-Being for Selected OECD Countries," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 48(3), pages 291-316, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:resrep:02td. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CSLS)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.